Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
Reports of deadly terrorist attacks are a regular feature of each day’s news — just like the weather report.
Who bears the responsibility for these grisly murders? The obvious culprits are those who plan and carry out the attacks. Also guilty are the countries that allow the terrorists to operate in their midst.
The Western press is also guilty of whitewashing the enormity of this evil. When a man kills his wife during an argument, the newspapers refer to him a murderer. Yet, those who carry out heinous terrorist atrocities are typically described by such terms as “extremists” or “militants”, thereby connoting less condemnation.
To cite just one example in 2002, Muslim terrorists kidnapped Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl. They then sawed his head off while he was awake, and posted the video on YouTube. This was not a subhuman act – it was subanimal. Yet, in a subsequent article on the event, CNN wrote: “Ahmad Omar Saeed Sheikh, a British-born Islamic militant, was sentenced to death by hanging in connection with Pearl’s murder.” Was it correct to somewhat dignify this Godless thug by calling him an “Islamic militant?” Rather, he was a cowardly, cruel, and depraved Islamic cutthroat (pardon the pun).
The repeated use of politically correct words that downplay the enormity of these atrocities creates a measure of acceptance that quiets the public outrage over terrorist murder. This, in turn, makes it somewhat easier for the killings to continue unopposed. Morally speaking, those behind these distortion have the blood of the terrorist victims on their hands.
read more at American Thinker:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/06/who_finances_the_terrorists.html