| Visitors Now: | |
| Total Visits: | |
| Total Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
TSA Pats Down Pregnant Woman As Possible Security Threat, Police State In Full Force (Video)
Alex Thomas
The Intel Hub
In recent months we have seen the TSA search and harass 9-year-old boys, disabled women, women with prosthetic breasts, attractive women, and just about anyone else that they have felt like harassing.
Millions of Americans have denounced these Orwellian tactics, yet the Department of Homeland Security continues to push for stricter security measures and even plans to plant TSA agents at malls and sporting events nationwide.
In yet another disgusting YouTube video, TSA is seen patting down a pregnant women as a possible terrorist! There is absolutely no possible way that the TSA actually thought this women was a security threat. No, this is about much more then cave-dwelling ninjas, this is about total control of every aspect of our society.
Do you believe this women was a security threat?
Fortunately we have recently seen multiple state legislatures come out in support of bills that would charge TSA agents with sexual harassment if they continued their invasive procedures.
Texas Rep. David Simpson(R) has brought forth a bill that would do just that. Speaking to Raw Story, Rep. David Simpson exposed TSA procedures as clear-cut sexual harassment.
“We’re talking about what would be a criminal act in any other place,” Rep. David Simpson (R) told Raw Story on Monday. “If you viewed someone naked without their permission or consent, or as a condition of travel, it would be sexual harassment or voyeurism. If you touched people’s privates, that would be sexual assault.
Last week New Hampshire State Rep. George Lambert made news when he co-sponsored a similar bill in a state where live free or die actually means something.
“Fighting a monumental battle over the TSA Scanner Operations is Rep. George Lambert, R-Litchfield, who is co-sponsor of bill (HB628-FN) which makes the touching or viewing with a technological device of a person’s breasts or genitals by a government security agent without probable cause a sexual assault, according to the introductory text of the bill,” wrote Shepard Ambellas.
“That is a crime in this state, and we should charge them every single time,” said bill co-sponsor Rep. George Lambert, R-Litchfield.(WMUR9)
If these bills are able to pass they could be used as blueprints for other states to follow. Not only do these bills show that even politicians see the tyranny, it also shows that Americans CAN stop the coming police state.
If we do not stand together, liberal and conservative, what we know as America will continue to deteriorate to the point of no return.
Source:
OK,
Ok, What is worse? A patdown where some guy you’ve never seen before wanting to put his hand down into you underwear and feel around your tentacles to see if your stash is a bag of explosives or a lump of C4 or a ounce of weed… or go through a machine that uses low power X-rays to see your naked body by a TSA 99er (IQ 99) on a computer screen in the next room, Said machine which has never had a definitive report released on the effects it was having on your “Family Jewels” and your ability to father a child someday in the future.
The story would be slightly different, if your were a woman or a little girl… but we won’t need to go there,, do we?
I hope to God this while TSA thing is about Security and not Population Reduction… Let the bastards touch you and keep the hell away from the Full Body Scanners. Please
http://www.ssrichardmontgomery.com/download/nlink/cavitys.jpg
The scanner that shows your full body does not use any radiation
It uses the natural freqenceys present in the body to show up as a shadow anything on the out side of it,like standing between a lamp & a screen (shadow) it cannot see anything hidden inside the body therefore compleatly safe. A few years ago as part of my work as a consultant electronics Eng I was able to see one of the first ones INSIDE & out & know exactly how it works.It would not be correct to say more here but there is no danger to anybody just maybe embarisment but better than internal search (which would still be requierd even with this type of eqiptment for strong suspect) radiation shows everything but does have its risks but only if you have many xrays in a short time & are very young.
She didn’t “pat her down,” she “RUBBED HER DOWN!” WTF was that all about? Hudred bucks says that old girl is gay as a 3 dollar bill?
“ssrichardmontgomery” is a TSA plant. Either that, or some other s*cka** trying to keep their job working for the tsa. Like I am gonna take his/her word for it. YOU go into those scanners. I’ll take my chances with the HOMO’s that work for the TSA. I can always knock him out if he gets too “touchy-feely.” You can’t knock out the x-ray machine. oops, I mean “scanner.”