Lloyd Pye Starchild Skull Update 9/20/2012
Edit: 9/20/2012
The latest from Lloyd Pye – as it turns out, the skull is not of a ‘child’, but rather an adult! Here’s the news:
“ AMMACH project interviewed ‘starchild researcher’ Lloyd Pye (author of Human Origins: Intervention Theory) in front of a small audience at StarChild Sponsor Belinda McKenzie’s Highgate residence in UK and got the latest updates from his investigation into the amazingskull found in 1930s and dating back to about 1100 AD.
Revelations in this update:
1) though from a very short ‘humanoid’, THIS IS THE SKULL OF AN ADULT.
2) the thin-boned tough-boned i.e. fibre-reinforced tooth-enamel-like skull of this ‘starchild’ has a capacity of 1600cc, that’s 200cc MORE than a full-grown human adult.
3) it’s looking like the ‘eye’ of this thing is a FIXED EYE and the ‘outer lens’ we associate with The Grays, the black almond-shaped eye is actually some sort of lens giving 180 degree vision.
Yes, Lloyd Pye is stating that the STARCHILD SKULL is actually ‘the skull of a Gray’ in this most recent interview with the AMMACH chaps — the plot (certainly) thickens.
I just received an email from Lloyd Pye – through his mailing group (so no, not directed specifically towards me) regarding his most recent update on the ongoing Starchild skull analysis.”
MORE @ http://paradigmrevolutions.ning.com/profiles/blogs/update-on-lloyd-pye-s-starchild-skull
It’s an abnormal HUMAN skull and nothing more. Pye is a clown, there’s no such thing as a “star child”.
That’s a bit of a stretch of the imagination seeing as they don’t have the jaw bone. You can pretty much ignore everything below the eyes seeing as that portion of the skull is absent, broken away and missing. Without the imaginative interpretation, it looks exactly like a child that’s suffered from Encephalitis.
While I am saddened by the name of “starchild skull”, abundant research by qualified laboratories indicates positively that this is not a human skull of any sort. They’ve even narrowed it down to a human mother and an unknown species (alien?) as the father.
An even more preposterous suggestion is that a clown would stick to an unprofitable waste of time for over ten years. And the Encephalitis hypothesis has been completely debunked.
The morphology of the skull is completely different then a human. He has geneticists and the like working on this – and in fact, the ‘star child’ skull is a misnomer anyway and one he wished was not stuck to the name of this thing.
If you’ve seen his lectures, read all about the stuff – watched everything about it..it’s pretty hard to deny, for those who no longer remain flaccid at the sound of anything remotely resembling conventional and mainstream scientific thought – that there is something unique to this.
The image on the right, the alien photo, is art stolen by Pye, after he screwed over the artist who created the first actual forensic reconstruction.
One other bit of info. I have a casting of the starchild skull, and a casting of the partial upper maxilla from the artist who did the first starchild reconstruction. The original skull had been lacquered, and sealed, which if anyone knows anything about solvents, destroys DNA like you would not believe.
Mr. Pye is an absolute fraud, he treated this artist friend of mine quite poorly, while shopping around the artist’s photos to publishers without his permission. Mr. Pye has some connections to some very interesting people to say the least.
I just called my artist buddy to let him know that Lloyd and others are still using his art. Funny.