Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Livable World (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

NYT Opinion: Nuclear Neighbors for North Korea?

Monday, March 11, 2013 20:08
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

North Korea is going all out with threats – why? What can be done? Here are some of my thoughts in the New York Times ‘Room for Debate’ opinion page in a discussion with other esteemed colleagues. Click here or see below:

New York Times Room for Debate

March 11, 2013

Nuclear Neighbors for North Korea?

North Korea declared the 1953 Korean War armistice nullified on Monday, in the wake of growing threats from the country’s leader Kim Jong-un directed last week at South Korea and the United States and the United Nations Security Council decision to in retaliation to its third nuclear test in February.

A new sense of vulnerability is leading some South Koreans to call for the development of its own nuclear weapons program. Its neighbor Japan could easily build up a nuclear arsenal. Will North Korea’s threats and continued testing cause more proliferation in the region?

For South Korea, It’s Unrealistic

By Duyeon Kim

South Korea’s development of nuclear weapons is not realistic, despite the demands made by a few conservative politicians whenever North Korea acts up. It would be a clear violation of international law that would sever political and economic relations with its closest ally, the U.S., and neighboring countries. South Korean nuclear armament risks turning back the clock to the disastrous economic situation during the Korean War and crippling the world’s 12th-largest economy, which relies so extensively on international trade. No more smartphones, no more fashion, no more musical sensations like Psy. Moreover, Seoul does not possess the technical capability to go nuclear.

Seoul hasn’t seriously considered nuclear weapons since the 1970s Park Chung-hee military rule. But that was ignited by fears of abandonment when President Jimmy Carter suddenly decided to withdraw U.S. troops from the peninsula.

Instead, there are more urgent, realistic questions that need to be addressed.

First, how to prevent possible conflict amid spiked tensions on the peninsula as North Korea has threatened nuclear war and declared the Korean War Armistice Agreement nullified, coincident with a new round of joint U.S.-South Korea military drills. North Korean unpredictability looms as South Korea braces for unexpected provocations. Let’s hope there are no miscalculations over the next couple of weeks that lead to unintended consequences.

Second, how to nip a bud that doesn’t want to be nipped. It is clear Pyongyang will not surrender its nuclear ambitions, including recognition as a nuclear power. Kim Jong-un’s regime is creating an extremely volatile situation apparently aimed at forcing Washington into peace treaty talks that would withdraw U.S. troops from the Korean Peninsula while keeping their nukes.

Inaction is worse than any not-good option. Diplomatic talks will need to resume at some point after the noise settles. But does President Obama have a clear North Korea policy, or even an interest?

Nukes of Hazard
The Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation is a Washington,
D.C.-based non-profit, non-partisan research organization dedicated to
enhancing international peace and security in the 21st century.

Follow Nukes of Hazard on Twitter



Source:

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.