Was the Oct 7 quake off SC the missing nuke planned for Charleston?
Thursday, October 24, 2013 10:01
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
Why choose Charleston?
We do not think the planned nuke at Charleston (disguised as a quake) is the final option yet. But it is the harbinger of what is yet to come. They would not choose their final option of mega tsunami-quake-meteor strike until everything necessary for the Armageddon, is in place.
So what are the Divine Guidance signs?
Notice the perfect right angle triangle formed by the 3 points; Charleston, 1007 Nuke point (20131007 quake epicentre) and 611-quake (short for the natural quake epicentre of 20010611). The last 3 digits read 611, the inverted image of 911. Magnitude was of course M3.3. How could it be anything else?
The distance to 1007 Nuke point from Charleston is 333 nautical miles, in the direction 117o. Since 1990 (available seismic activity data from USCG before the shut down), there was no recorded seismic activity within the 225 n.mi radius of 1007 Nuke point. The latitude of 611-quake was 30.226o. Close enough to the 225 n.mi distance (rounded up dist) from 1007 Nuke point to the nearest and most recent quake on 2007, Dec 27 M4.6.
In other words, you can bet there will not be a natural quake epicentre in this geologically stable section of the North American plate. Notice also that 611-quake lies on a regional seabed escarpment known as the Florida-Hatteras Slope. If any natural quake were to occur, it would have been along this escarpment, canyon or the steeper continental shelf; not at 1007 Nuke point.
From a geological perspective, there is little evidence to support a natural occurring quake at 1007 Nuke point. Plus the evidence given by Peter Eyre, the conclusion would be a nuke detonation on 20131007, rather than a natural quake.
The amazing time machine – accurate within a minute
But why would anyone want to waste an expensive weapon of mass destruction in the middle of nowhere? Why spend millions for no apparent profit? The rumour that Charleston was the intended false flag target make more sense, now that it is confirmed from various angles (pun intended) 1007 Nuke was not a natural quake.
The nuke was timed to detonate at 58 minutes past the hour or 01:58 UTC. Why such oddly precise time of 58 minutes past the hour as another PMD, the 2004 boxing day mega tsunami-quake off Sumatra? The 2004 boxing day tsunami-quake was also perfectly timed to the Great Kanto quake in Japan in 1923. In all probability, the 2004 Tsunami-quake and 1007 Nuke were copycat MIHOPs; meant to capitalise on the mega devastation of a naturally occurring quake. They had not invented PMD (Planned Mega-natural Disaster) yet in 1923. The sinking of the Titanic in 1912 was a premeditated mass murder disguised as an accident.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=477310368996237&set=a.128510663876211.20575.100001518344620&type=3&theater
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=477310368996237&set=a.128510663876211.20575.100001518344620&type=3&theater
