Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Deborah Dupre (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

911 Insider Claims Complicity To Murders

Thursday, September 15, 2011 2:50
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

 

Copyright Deborah Dupré. All Rights Reserved.

 

Photographer hired to be accomplice to 911 murders

On the tenth anniversary of the September 11, 2001 New York City mass murder, a Little Rock, Arkansas architectural photographer, Tom-Scott Gordon provided what is possibly the most important testimony evidencing 911 was orchestrated by U.S. officials who indirectly hired him to unwittingly help plan the attack nine years before the operation was activated. Since then, Gordon became a targeted individual by U.S. officials and a leading 911 Truth group dismissed his testimony. 

 
"As soon as I learned the North Tower had been hit, all I could think of was that I had personally seen the faces of those directly in charge of this operation,” Gordon said this weekend in an exclusive interview with the Examiner.
 
Exclusivity of this interview was not from Gordon hiding for ten years nor pleading the Fifth Amendment.

C

Photograph: World Trade Center (Credit TS Gordon)

Continue reading on Examiner.com Exclusive: 911 insider claims complicity to murders – National Human Rights | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/exclusive-man-admits-accomplice-to-911#ixzz1Xz9p7Zxb

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 11 comments
  • Mr. Gordon says he is not afraid. As security, this testimony was filmed and sent to various points of safe keeping.

  • NEW FINAL NAIL IN THE 911 COFFIN VIDEO!!!
    A must watch…

    DO THIS NOW! Send the Link to your local News Stations NOW!
    I sent this to WKEF WDTN WHIO located in town:

    Subject: URGENT BREAKING NEWS!!!

    (Body)
    “If this does not make news..
    You should SHOOT YOURSELF!”
    CLICK:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5kouddrPxE&feature=channel_video_title
    –end–

    Our Military needs to get it’s ass in gear!

  • Ohioleda, tried to watch video, it is no longer available. I’ve noticed that a lot of 9/11 videos are no longer available. Do you suppose this is censorship?

  • It loaded fine for me.. But, they have removed it from 2 othr channels already because it is so incriminating.. TRY AGAIN!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5kouddrPxE&feature=channel_video_title

    WT7 IS the smoking gun!!!!

  • I’ve watched that video at least 50 or more times already. Found the pattern of these tiny explosions??? Most interesting indeed too! They do seem to follow a uniformed pattern. Thus, the location’s for those tiny explosions were damn close to that buildings last line of defense? the structural supports. Now, I’m not saying, that these were indeed explosions triggered by some kind of computerized detonation software. However, I did notice a perfectly timed set of flashes in unmistakable timed sequence moving horizontally. Looking quite artificial due to the timing, even to an untrained eye something obviously stinks here… Agree?

  • 1. She covered the 9-11 commission WITHOUT EVER MENTIONING THE CHIEF OF STAFF AND WHO HE WAS AND HIS DEEP CONNECTIONS TO THOSE WHO DID 9-11. This was the man who directed, managed and controlled the investigation for the commission on a daily basis. He is the one who decided to eliminate witnesses, evidence, and to take unsworn testimony from Bush and Cheney, NOT SEPERATELY, BUT TOGETHER, SO CHENEY COULD HANDLE BUSH, and NOT SWORN TESTIMONY, BEHIND CLOSED DOORS WITH NO PUBLIC RELEASE OF THEIR TESTIMONY.

  • 2. Why didn’t she mention that Chertoff, the dual Israeli citizen, include a phrase in the patriot act “…… that provided immunity to ISRAEL FOR ANYTHING SHE MAY HAVE DONE ON 9-11″. Why did he find the need to do that? That is an indictable fact.

  • 3. All of the above was avoided by the reporter on the national inquirer and that was my point. Is this a disinformation, distraction point and why did he, the whistleblower, take 10 years to provided this innocuous non information piece??? This reminds me of wikileaks that keeps disclosing info that alternative researchers had way before he ever released it. Once its out, the powers that be take i over and distort it, and that is what this looks like. Both are questionable, the whistleblower and the reporter.

  • 4. I tried to put these same points up on the National Inquirer article comments section and they got censored and not put up. That alone tells me this is not something they want up for others to see. I commend “Before It’s News” for being a truth telling publication that allows free speech and questioning. I have come to appreciate that more and more every day since I get censored more and more every day. LOL

  • Video is back now.

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.