| Visitors Now: | |
| Total Visits: | |
| Total Stories: |
Did Flight 23 have a date with Building 7 on 9/11/2001?
Friday, November 25, 2011 22:07
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
Tex Lahoma
Bluebeerriver
11/25/11
Once I saw enough evidence to believe that 9/11 truly was an inside job, I figured that building 7 was suppose to get hit by a plane but it, somehow, did not make it.
So, by the end of the day, the "people that did it" decided it would be better to have a ridiculous, drop in it's own footprint, obvious, demolition of building 7 than to get caught with a building fully wired with explosives.
If flight 23 didn't have a date with building 7, then one of the other planes that didn't make it off the ground surely did.
.
.
This is hardly a new idea. Most truthers think the plane that crashed (shot down) in shanksville was intended for 7.
Why did the perps still collapse 7 even though they knew that would cause a ton of grief for them since there was no explanation except controlled demo? I don’t think it’s because they had no way to explain the explosives they had planted. They could have removed them. They collapsed 7 because there was some extremely incriminating financial info stored there. The collapse of 7 was actually more important to them than the collapse of the twin towers. Invading iraq was NOT what the 911 attacks were about.
The United #23 story is most likely a part of the cover up that crazy Arabs hi-jacked commercial air liners, did amazing aerobatic maneuvers with them, destroyed 2 WTC towers and damaged the Pentagon.