Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Evidence of overlaid images, sound dubbing, and digital imagery used in Televised footage of 9/11 Trade Tower events

Wednesday, December 7, 2011 21:27
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

URL link to the complete compilation:
http://www.blissful-wisdom.com/digital-imaging-used-in-tv-broadcasts-of-911-trade-tower-events.html

Please take the time to watch, listen and think about these investigations which expose major TV Broadcasting agencies caught in the act of using digital imaging, graphically overlaid images, and sound dubbing on their televised broadcasts of the 9/11 trade tower controlled demolition.

Analysis of the plume of smoke…not the plane:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkzfKRe0gbc&feature=fvwrel


This helicopter video clip shows us that no plane hit the second tower, yet there was an explosion.
Other news agencies showing the same camera angle footage, must have 'inserted' the image of an approaching plane.  Why were the images of a plane digitally inserted?
/story/1877/785/New_9_11_Footage:_There_Is_No_Plane_-_Filmed_From_Helicopter.html

Did the alleged aircraft even arrive at the towers?
9/11 Airplane Affidavit by John Lear, son of Learjet inventor
/story/1935/777/9_11_Airplane_Affidavit_By_John_Lear,_Son_Of_Learjet_Inventor.html?currentSplittedPage=6


And who would be able to control those aircraft?
And who could switch off transponders at the exact time these aircraft entered 'radar gaps'?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=WC9KZ2Yy5g4#at=390

Radar Physics Group develops Flight Termination System defense technology.
http://911review.org/brad.com/batcave/Dov_Zakheim_911.html

This investigator says that the plane that hit the second (South)Tower was not Flight 175.  By his estimates a model 300  of the Boeing 767 was used.  However, even if it were a 767 – 200, a remodeled military 767 – 200 could have been used.
http://www.amics21.com/911/flight175/dud.html

Which would explain the 'fishy' flight data
http://911review.org/brad.com/flights_air.html

And would explain the fact that at least 7 of the 'alleged' hijackers are still alive
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/hijackers.html

And would explain why expert pilots discuss their doubts with regards to any inexperienced pilots being able to maneuver passenger airplanes into the World Trade Center towers at speeds over 500 mph at those low altitudes.  In other words, were those planes actually 'passenger' airliners or were they 'remote-controlled' aircraft?  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm58cPH8L78
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16TExO2afr8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm58cPH8L78&NR=1

Different Videos reveal Different Aircraft Speeds.  Why?
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/speed/

 

More Digital Imaging Revealed:

Analysis of the plume of smoke…not the plane:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkzfKRe0gbc&feature=fvwrel

Some very interesting analysis of home shots versus television station footage
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbYAV5fCGiM&feature=related

More analysis of smoke plume in relation to the aircraft image
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKeqdV7dON8&NR=1&feature=endscreen

Nose in – Nose out, followed by a deliberate CNN cover-up:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXda5Kn2LAM&feature=related

More analysis of sounds dubbed into released trade tower explosion tapes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfacCQj_mlI&feature=related

BBC reporting is very. very 'fishy'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc0E6wTgb5Q&feature=related

This investigator discovers that a Jennifer Spell video has used 'spellbinding fakery':
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/spell/

One person's analysis of televised aircraft images.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbpygrU0S1w&NR=1

Another Youtube video showing actual broadcast videos which were 'doctored' with digital imaging:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vIR0uaDSuA&feature=related
again begging the question "Well then, what did cause the explosions in those  trade towers?"
and more importantly, "Why were we shown graphically altered videos in the first place?"

This is where the movie "Wag The Dog" becomes important.
The movie reveals how easily doctored images of 'passenger aircraft' were digitally inserted into 9/11 WTC Television footage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-FXkj-r9Mc 
These video clips explain why so many air force pilots have their own doubts as to the ''official White House, and televised, version of 9/11 events".  It also explains how doctored, and studio produced, 'Bin Laden' video tapes were often fed to the unwary public.
We learn from the movie 'Wag The Dog' just how digital imaging is done:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k-rr70xj2o&feature=related

Expert pilots discuss their doubts about being able to maneuver aircraft into the trade towers.
Expert pilots discuss their doubts with regards to any air pilots, experienced or not, being able to maneuver passenger airplanes into the World Trade Center towers at speeds over 500 mph:  In other words, were those planes actually 'passenger' airliners?   What did cause those explosions in the two tallest trade towers?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm58cPH8L78

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16TExO2afr8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm58cPH8L78&NR=1

A little photo analysis of underside appendage of the plane which hit the second trade tower.
http://www.world-mysteries.com/doug_911.htm

 

Could it have been a modified, commercial 767 aircraft with a missile attached to its underside? http://www.investigate911.info/911photos.htm
Which would explain 'Aircraft in   –  Missile Out'
http://webfairy.org/missileout/index.htm
This investigator says that the plane that hit the South Tower was not Flight 175
http://www.amics21.com/911/flight175/dud.html
And would explain the 'fishy' flight data
http://911review.org/brad.com/flights_air.html

 

Witnesses Question What Hit The Towers
Eyewitnesses were not sure that it was 'passenger' airplanes that hit the trade towers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT1z90BB8E4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2QAh0rBrew&feature=related

Eyewitnesses report seeing a 'military plane' with 'no windows' hit the towers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVH5jm06pJY&feature=related

In the next interview with 9/11 firemen, at the 2:33 minute mark, the firefighter states that he saw a 'black, very large airplane fly into the second building'.   He didn't see a 'passenger plane'….he saw what was reported by others as a 'military plane'….or by others as a 'plane with no windows'.   Besides their testimony of bombs and explosions going off, indicating it was a controlled demolition, the report of a 'black' airplane hitting the second tower is important to take notice of.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmC_HKRu428&feature=related

Trade Towers: "No second plane….it was a bomb". 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0eC3uns3pA&feature=related

Eyewitnesses report one tower was hit by a 'military plane' with no windows inside:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdB5iMydROM
Some photos of military aircraft without windows…and some statements by eye-witnesses:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRC4lCQuBmc&NR=1&feature=endscreen

In depth analysis of the second 'plane':
More video analysis about missile and second plane
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8mWx_JfyoM&feature=related
more in depth analysis of the underside of the aircraft that hits the second tower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVoU0f9gtlE&feature=endscreen&NR=1
http://911review.com/spencer/markup/spencer06.html

Air Traffic Controller said the activity of the aircraft reminded him of a military aircraft:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vPpZOxSyCs&feature=related

Proof bombs were detonated from inside the towers just like in a "controlled demolition"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvyBY8d554I

Could it have been a grey aircraft with no windows, as was seen by some?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jRC4lCQuBmc&feature=related

Could this have been a modified aircraft holding a missile?
This eye-witness claims he heard the sound of a missile approaching the second tower. Even the chopper 4 televised images don't show us any 'large' aircraft approaching that tower.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hq8eiNxKFXI

URL link to the complete compilation:
http://www.blissful-wisdom.com/digital-imaging-used-in-tv-broadcasts-of-911-trade-tower-events.html
 

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 1 comment
  • And if this does not get you to see the truth, remember aircraft off course are ordered to be shot down, since the late 1960′s.

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.