September 11th 2001: May Not Have Happened the Way We Were Told
As the title implies, 9/11 may not have happened the way the official government version implies it did. There are many components and aspects of the official version of events on 9/11 that just do not stand up to further scrutiny and review. Actions of certain agencies, their knowledge and possible foreknowledge of the event, as well as the actual alleged terrorist themselves identities. There are valid questions as to administration foreknowledge as well. Since the years have gone by many more videos and evidence has come to light that truly bring the entire event into question. Let us examine a few key points.
Muslim Extremist’s?
History has given us many examples of exactly what fundamental Islamic Jihadist are like, and the things they do. These individuals adhere to a fundamental form of Islam, which forbids alcohol, infidelity, and that all of those not of Islam, are enemies of Islam. These are the Fundamental views of Islam and these are the dictates extremist adhere to. It would not seem that Muslim Jihadist’s who was preparing to enter heaven would so abandoned all their fundamental beliefs, days before what they would have called their glory. Of the nineteen terrorist who are alleged to have perpetrated the events, four were found to still be alive. In the years since these individuals were found to be alive, there has been no correction in the FBI list of the hijackers. Two of the lead hijackers were seen in strip bars drinking as well as openly using cocaine. One of the terrorist rented a home from C.I.A. assets. Three of these individuals listed U.S Naval bases on their license as their address.
It is easily discernable that these men in no way acted out of a fundamental believe in Islam when they committed this act on our land. None of these men seem to fit the profile of what our Government would have us believe were extremist’s. These men did not hide and lay in the shadows until their mission was successful. Indeed they were very flamboyant individuals and in no way could have possibly been true Fundamental Muslims, let alone extremists.
NORAD’s Inaction.
NORAD, the North American Air Defense, has been charged with the protection of American airspace for fifty some odd years. Communication between the FAA and NORAD has been long standing in regards to hijacked planes. By some chance the FAA lost an aircraft on radar or lost contact with pilots; NORAD would respond within minutes upon notification. On many occasions before 9/11 the FAA had called on NORAD to intercept aircraft, and it was done within ten minutes in most cases. For many years this is the way that these two organizations interacted. Certain policy changes put into effect by Dick Cheney in the months before 9/11 would put shoot down authority from the military to himself or the President. Oddly enough, not long after 9/11 shoot down authority was returned to the military.
On 9/11, the entire NORAD structure was involved in a massive nationwide war-game. One involved diverting American fighters to the Arctic Circle to fight imaginary Russian bombers. Another part of the war game had false radar blips inserted onto operator’s screens to simulate hijacked aircraft. These games were spread over the entire air defense system and were essentially running the exact scenery unfolding on 9/11. The war games so crippled and confused our military that 75 % of the targets were hit. F-16’s were flown 200 miles away over the Atlantic, allowing flight eleven to hit the pentagon. The war games were rescheduled from August to September 11th by vice president Dick Chaney. Our military was effectively in stand down mode, until the attacks were done.
In the wake and aftermath of 9/11 there were no military officials demoted or fired. There were many who were promoted though. After the Pearl Harbor attacks, a witch hunt was conducted against the Military and a few key individuals were terminated. I wonder why the same principal was not applied to 9/11 considering it was later referred to as The New Pearl Harbor!
Prior knowledge.
Since 9/11, many facts have came to light that cast suspension as to who knew exactly what about 9/11 before the attacks. Many put options were laid against the airlines in the days prior and were never collected. Put options are a bet that a stock will drop or fail in the near future. These put options were placed in the weeks before 9/11 and in some instances were 50 to 100 times more prevalent than in any time before! Not one individual or organization has stepped forward to collect the massive amounts of money made on the put options the next few days when the airline stocks crashed!
President Bush declared he, nor the prior administration, envisioned planes as weapons. This despite the fact that multiple examples of the days exact events can be found in reports and war games played in prior years. On august 6th 2001, President Bush was handed a daily security brief with the title; Bin Laden determined to strike in United States. Knowing that he had an active terrorist trying to attack America, no security alerts or warnings were sent out by the Administration.
President Bush further indicated prior knowledge in that he claimed to see the 1st plane hit on a T.V that was on while waiting to read a book with children. If he did actually see it, it would indicate prior knowledge because the 1st strike was not shown until later in the day. If Mr. Bush truly saw the first impact that morning, he was watching something no other person in the world was privy to.
All indications seem to point to 9/11 not transpiring the way the Official version said it did. There are still multitudes of unanswered questions on many issues of that day. More and more indications are that there was prior knowledge, and possible involvement by very highly placed individuals. There exists very real and tangible evidence and implications, that 9/11 did not happen the way we were told. Since the event there has come to light new video and information forced to be released by freedom of information lawsuits against NIST, the agency who studied collapse initiation. Many videos of explosions, firefighters reporting explosions that you and I have never seen! Clear video showing indications that Bldg 7 in no way was a natural collapse due to damage and fire!
Conclusion
9/11 was a lie! Research everything I have said in this article, and prove me wrong!
The problem is that the majority of U. S. citizens can not / will not accept the fact that certain members of our government would take part in this attack on the U. S. Then when you bring up the Zionist part in this attack , you are labeled an anti-semitic . Been there done that for several years !
My favorite retoric is: “SOMETIMES THE LAWS OF PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING LOGIC DO NOT APPLY”
Isn’t this story about 10 years too late? From day one it was clear the official story was a lie. The truth movement has presented all these theories many times over. 911 was a FALSE FLAG EVENT, plain and simple. If you want to know who dun it, look no further than the authors of ‘A New American Century’. They called for a “new Pearl Harbor” and that’s what they got.
WAKE UP AMERICA you are being scammed RIGHT NOW, into a war with Iran and Syria. BOYCOTT THE MILITARY, IMPEACH OBAMA, ARREST BUSH, DO YOUR DUTY AND PROTECT YOUR REPUBLIC.
“September 11th 2001: May Not Have Happened the Way We Were Told”
ya think?
Other’s who profit off 911…
I totally agree with Jewish writer Richard Silverstein, time for the Islamophobia Industry Network folks to close up shop!
http://www.richardsilverstein.com
Major Study Finds No Muslim-American Terror Menace
February 9th, 2012
Will someone tell Pam Geller, Robert Spencer, David Yerushalmi, and Gates of Vienna they might as well close up shop. A new study reported by the NY Times‘
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/08/us/radical-muslim-americans-pose-little-threat-study-says.html?_r=1
Scott Shane confirms what most of us knew all along. The alleged phenomenon of Muslim-American terror is largely concocted from their fevered, belabored imagination:
A feared wave of homegrown terrorism by radicalized Muslim Americans has not materialized, with plots and arrests dropping sharply over the two years since an unusual peak in 2009, according to a new study by a North Carolina research group.
The study, to be released on Wednesday, found that 20 Muslim Americans were charged in violent plots or attacks in 2011, down from 26 in 2010 and a spike of 47 in 2009.
Charles Kurzman, the author of the report for the Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security, called terrorism by Muslim Americans “a minuscule threat to public safety.” Of about 14,000 murders in the United States last year, not a single one resulted from Islamic extremism, said Mr. Kurzman, a professor of sociology at the University of North Carolina.
The report also notes that the number of American Muslims charged with terrorism since 9/11 has topped out at the whopping total of 193. Of all the thousands of such cases, only 193 were perpetrated by Muslims in the past 11 years! The anti-jihadis owe these American citizens an abject apology. But they won’t get one. Instead they’ll continue feeling the cold blast of hate. And anti-Muslim haters like Yerushalmi will continue their financially lucrative campaign of writing anti-Sharia laws for state governments, some of which don’t even have a substantial Muslim population living in their borders. If anything was a solution in search of a problem, this is it.
No doubt, Geller will be snooping into the study author’s background (Jewish) attempting to find bias or some other taint. Good luck to her. It won’t take much to satisfy her twisted mind that the study is part of the international conspiracy to downplay the Muslim menace.
Read the fear Inc. report at
Fear, Inc. The Roots of the Islamophobia Network in America
Download this report (pdf)
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2011/08/islamophobia.html
Read the report in your web browser (Scribd)
Download individual chapters of the report (pdf):
■Introduction and summary
■Chapter 1: Donors to the Islamophobia network
■Chapter 2: The Islamophobia misinformation experts
■Chapter 3: The grassroots organizations and the religious right
■Chapter 4: The right-wing media enablers of anti-Islam propaganda
■Chapter 5: The political players
■Conclusion