| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
WTC 100% Military Plane Proof Witnesses
by Xendrius
MAKE THIS ONE VIRAL, THERE IS NO OTHER 9/11 DRONE VID LIKE THIS. THANKS TO WEARECHANGENJ FOR MUCH OF THE FOOTAGE.
A remade video of an older version, this one contains many new witnesses.
Common questions: How did the shadow government (the conspirators) take over the planes?
Answer: They could have done it by having CIA agents on the plane along with their arab mercinaries and made the people believe it was a hijacking, and then flown the plane manually to a remote base where they got rid of all the passengers and then took the plane apart.
Possibility 2: They just took over the plane from the ground, turned off the transponder and then flew the plane to wherever they prepared it for. (All commercial airliners are designed so that full control can be taken of the plane from the ground).
What about the calls that were made by the passengers?
Answer: If you believe that no such thing as voice morph is possible that can fool relatives and loved ones, watch “The afterlife investigations”. The calls were impossible and many were suspicious, for example, Ted Olson claimed that his wife called him from a seatphone from 1 of the planes, turns out that particular American Airlines plane had no seatphones.
His testimony contradicts what the FBI later concluded in their “investigation” about the calls. Ted Olson was also a Bush administration insider, they could have very well just made him come up with this story to give some credibility to the hijacker theory.
Why are there around 3 people who said the second plane was United Airlines?
Answer: It is expected that the shadow government would have actors ready on phone/running around trying to get some airtime to say the plane was a UA plane, so nothing strange there, and many probably got fooled and said it was a UA plane based on the painted tail, which was infact blue, they just did not bother painting the rest of the plane blue for a reason, I assume they thought that there would be no close-up shots of the belly. But all the close-up shots show the plane had a grey belly, the same shade of grey that the towers had in the shadow.
There is 1 very common faked “still-image” on the web that shows a semi-high resolution picture of a UA plane about to hit the second tower, this picture has no source and even looks fake. We have 2 clear video sources showing the plane had a grey belly, this just shows that the conspirators had this image faked to give some credibility to the UA 175 theory.
PART 2:
9/11: Missing Airliners Explained – They Did Not Impact The Towers – Drones Did
/9-11-and-ground-zero/2012/09/missing-airliners-explained-they-did-not-impact-the-towers-drones-did-2438918.html
So where are the people ?
If ya think about it there is only one logical answer to your question…… Where do you hide several airliners full of dead people????……… The ocean.
That’s really stupid. We saw the passenger planes hit the WTC. Just another example of how facts don’t matter.
No, we did not see the passenger planes hit the WTC. There are several videos showing close-up shots of the planes hitting the buildings. They were clearly not passenger planes. They were military aircraft, whose side windows were completely different than those on commercial air liners.
Also, why weren’t US fighter jets scrambled from Westover Air Force Base in Chicopee Massachusetts, which is located just off the Mass Pike around fifty miles west of Boston? At least one of the hi-jacked planes flew right over Westover air base not once, but twice!
Begin pausing the video at 2:02, then 203, and 204 so that you may also recognize that this is an impossibility… it defies the laws of physics. You can see that the impact of the plane does not create an enormous hole in the face of the building. Instead, there is only a thin, seam-like outcome… as if the building opened up, swallowed the plane and then instantly closed up tightly again. Think of the numerous video clips of news reports showing cars crashing into buildings… there is always a huge hole, at least the size of the car, that remains wide and gapping from the moment of impact until the hole is repaired at a much later time… not a hole that inexplicably, completely, and instantly closed up after the car fully entered the building.
I served in the USAF for 20+ year. I now do video production and video editing. To put this very simply, this is a poorly edited video production. Any kid with Adobe Premiere Pro could make this video in about 30 minutes.
Stop with the BS. We have plenty of REAL WORLD issues to deal with.
Here is a video of the 2nd plane hitting the WTC. This is cut from CNN. See the difference?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zMseIGe-YvE
There you go again. Confusing “what really happened” with facts and common sense! Conspiracy theries don’t require either one to be proven without ANy doubt! You must be a governmental disinfo agent, or a Jew, or an Illuminati, or Bildaberger, or mason, or member of the Catholic church, or a Boyscout or Brownie, or…
RJ, your vid doesn’t show anything. I would be careful about using CNN as a source for ANYTHING.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIZh1nm8Lzg