| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
The Smoking Gun of 9-11
.jpg)
THE SMOKING PILE – this photo from October 11, 2001, shows white smoke billowing from beneath the rubble. Thermitic reactions produce aluminum oxide which is a white smoke – photo by Stan Honda, AP.
According to the official version of 9-11, the Twin Towers collapsed due to catastrophic structural failure caused by burning jet fuel and office materials. Because this demonstrably false explanation cannot account for the huge amount of molten metal that accompanied the collapses it is simply NOT discussed.
The molten metal in the rubble was created by the highly energetic and explosive material that pulverized the Twin Towers. This material is the real smoking gun of 9-11 – it was used to destroy the towers and kill nearly 3,000 people on 9-11 and has killed and ruined the lives of thousands more.
Richard J. Lee did a study of the dust found in the Deutsche Bank building, which was severely damaged during the “WTC Event”. Among other things, the Lee study of the WTC dust found large quantities of ultra-fine (i.e. nano-size) spherical particles of lead. These ultra-fine particles of lead are extremely toxic because their small size makes them respirable, and once in the body they are able to penetrate to the nucleus of the human cell. The ultra-fine particles of lead found in the WTC dust were “as much as a million times more respirable than lead in other dust,” according to the expert study. This fact is one reason why so many people who were exposed to the dust and smoke from the destroyed towers have succumbed to cancer.
http://www.bollyn.com/#article_13741
“Three weeks after the collapse the fires still burned and molten metal still flowed underground”.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-jeQmW5wiA
fraud alert fraud alert fraud alert
Hydraulics don’t work n heat!
please read “where did the towers go? for real 911 truth.
You can’t fool anyone but children with that already proven years ago incompetent complicit cover-up dr. judy wood’s impossible nonsense. The pitiful pathetic part is we/us internet users knew in advance cointellpro misinformation’s were on it’s way, in full force, basically meaning you Michael John Wegrzyn Sr are now a confirmed complicit accomplice treasonous traitor, what do you think about that? Hey cointellpro I’ll give you $1000.00 if can prove anything on this page is not true http://www.whodidit.org/
9/11, an act of pre-set explosives and control demolitions – the two Twin Towers brought down in approximately 9 seconds each and Building 7 in only 6.5 seconds.
http://www.opednews.com/Diary/How-Do-2-Planes-Bring-Down-by-Lance-Ciepiela-120907-434.html
Headline: cancer kills all the witnesses of the 9/11 was inside job clean-up. I bet all the guys in that picture have now succumb from cancers and so they won’t be testifying to the carnage.
Being in that mess without a breathing apparatus shows no common sense whatsoever. What would brainwash override a person’s common sense to kill themselves, it’s believing the federal government wouldn’t lie to you when saying they tested the air and it’s OK to breath, betrayed in public for all to see but you still must die because you’re a witness.
The dramatic loss of life on the morning of 9/11 resulting from an initial criminal act is used as a pretext and a justification to wage an all out war of retribution, in the name of 9/11 against the alleged perpetrators of 9/11, namely the “state sponsors of terrorism”, including Afghanistan, Iraq as well as Iran.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/september-11-2001-the-crimes-of-war-committed-in-the-name-of-911/5311561
Cointellpro are right on your heels so I will team-up and defend the truth I know you speak of. Scary stuff knowing your government are a bunch of freaks and sociopaths.
Minutes after the planes became air born somebody somehow was able to send a signal to the planes, causing the control panels to be disabled and the flight destination altered. What happened was that an anti-hijack system was activated (code word ‘home run’) and the regular pilot was put out of control. This pilot will probably have tried frantically to regain control of his aircraft. It is not very likely he will have told his passengers about the new situation since that would only cause panic.
http://how911wasdone.blogspot.com/
There is only a small amount of weak evidence, mostly personal testimony, which suggests that thermite or explosives were used on 9/11. In contrast, there is a very large, robust body of both empirical and testimonial evidence suggesting that explosives were not used on 9/11. Most importantly, the large body of empirical evidence from 9/11 can be explained by one thing, and one thing only, a general class of weaponry known as directed energy weapons.
Thermite or explosives of any kind do not come close to explaining all of the empirical evidence from 9/11, so there is not much credible, verifiable information suggesting it was used. It would not stand up in a court of law for very long since it is not supported by the robust body of empirical evidence from 9/11. Again, most evidence in support of thermite or explosives is testimonial in nature, such as witnesses “hearing explosions” or “seeing molten liquid”. Testimonial evidence is the weakest form of evidence because people are often mistaken and/or biased. Please keep in mind that loud, explosive noises can be caused by many things, and it is very plausible that items were independently exploding as the buildings were transformed to dust. Please also keep in mind that glowing objects or liquids do not directly imply hot or molten steel, as many objects can glow or melt under lower stresses and temperatures. As for the small amount of objective evidence for thermite, this could be explained by many common, logical things, some of which are discussed at the links below.
Even Richard Gage admitted to me that thermite does not explain the evidence AND that he has not studied the NYC seismographic data, yet he is one of the primary pushers of thermite as if it is the one and only thing we should talk about. Luckily I got his suspicious behavior and responses on video tape when I questioned him at a presentation in Peoria, IL. See for yourself (he admits to those things in Part 2):
Richard Gage Exposed by Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez at AE911Truth Presentation on 4/12/2011 (Part 1/2): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ir0vukXoWGU
Richard Gage Exposed by Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez at AE911Truth Presentation on 4/12/2011 (Part 2/2): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9VvSBwVT_A
and here is more information that may help clarify the thermite topic:
Andrew Johnson’s Evidence-Packed ‘Thermite Free 9/11′ page: http://911thermitefree.blogspot.com
Thermic Lance Cuts WTC Beams during WTC Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VskSiHS1r0
WTC Steel Columns Cut at Angles During 9/11 Ground Zero Cleanup | 9/11 Myths: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdBv7uaQT_0
9/11 Ground Zero Molten Steel or Work Lights? | 9/11 Myths: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEfjmvAVKnw
9/11 “Pull It” WTC Building Demolition via Pulling Cables | 9/11 Myths: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUZtTQHiLSw
No Thermite on 9/11?! | Explosives Do NOT Explain the Evidence! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkRjXAU0gi8
9/11 WTC Explosive Demolition is NOT Supported by the Evidence | 9/11 Myths: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMNNPnXBH4M
The most important thing I am attempting to convey is that there is one and only one conclusion that explains all of the available empirical evidence from 9/11, and this is directed energy weapons. Neither jetfuel, thermite, nukes, or explosives come close to explaining all this evidence, yet directed energy weapons explain it with overwhelming conclusiveness.
Thanks for your interest in this important topic, and for sharing your concerns.
Sincerely,
-Abe
Abraham Hafiz Rodriguez
M4 Medical Student
B.S. Biology/Neurobiology
”Something was brought into that building that would help with the detonation” – Susan Lindauer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnbMjAN7Bws