| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
More 9/11 Plane / No plane Stuff / Project Blue Beam Chris and Janet Morris
More 9/11 Plane / No plane Stuff Chris and Janet Morris
Project Blue Beam Chris and Janet Morris
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGaGKm66j-8
Project Blue Beam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tL0HBlSQL8g
If told you I was going to drive my car off a pier and into the side of a battleship because I believed I could sink any sized battleship because of the magic of momentum and kinetic energy and a car is built with a iron block engine and I showed you video of a my car doing just that on film would you believe me? Well that’s what happened on 9/11. The towers were an up right battleships and something that normally has trouble with birds could suddenly burst through a steel wall like Mr. Kool Aid was somehow believed by millions and despite the lack of a plane crashing and slowly developing on film, because 30 frames per second is too slow and all the photos of the crash development, frozen withinin snap shots also have gone magically missing and still no one raises one dissenting word about it is just amazing to me and only responses I get are of the same moron bullshit.
A standard armor piercing heavy grain 7.62 * 39 AK-47 round (designed to puncture steel) flies ~2400 feet per second which according to my 9th grade physics textbook is about 1500 MPH when you do the conversion. That is about Mach 2.5. The manufacturer states this can cut 3/8 ths of an inch into steel @ best and then is dead.
From a ballistics perspective, in order to penetrate steel you requre 2 things. First off, a) u require a speed > Mach 2.0, but more importantly b) your ballistic projectile must be denser than the steel target you wish to penetrate like DU (Depleted Uranium) or Tungsten. You can’t lob an aluminum or plastic projectile @ Mach 2.0 and hope it will cut through the steel. It won’t even scuff the paint. It’s just not possible no matter how many Rambo movies you saw as a kid.
That being said, a Boeing 757 (which cannot go faster than a lousy 265 MPH @ sea level) and has a nose cone made of plastic and fiberglass cannot slice through the perimeter columns of the WTC. The perimeter columns alone were 5.5 inch thick steel walls and were doubled up on the backside to a total of 11 inches of thick steel. Now multiple that by 4 sets of columns including the concrete that was poured into each column. A tank round *might* get through just once of these 8 walls @ point blank range, but keep in mind that a tank round is just puncturing through the face plates. It does not have a ‘wing’ like an airplane which spans 60 meters along a horizon which must additionally slice through 33 inches of 5.5 inch thick steel sidewall from the front plate of each column to the back plate of the same column (they are TUBULAR). Re-read this a few times if you don’t see the picture and it will eventually hit you. No commercial jetliner or drone or whatever hit the towers and there is no evidence of this other than video footage which has been proven fake.
If you study the ‘plane’ silhouette in the North Tower, for example, you will see the columns are cut in ridiculously straight lines and steeped along a horizon. Cutter charges were used to blow them inwards, but the problem the perps had was that the unruly explosive blowback force of the cutter charges managed to blow the aluminum cladding (which covered the perimeter columns) *OUTWARDS* onto the sidewalks…and in full length strips. (Shows Compromised Square Outer Wall) i.e http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAz3ewJgdtA How can something cut through the perimeter columns without cutting through the aluminum cladding which had once covered them? That means a) no planes and b) that the cutter charges had to have been placed between the outside perimeter columns and that ugly grey aluminum cladding which covered them.
If you study images of the sidewalks *directly below* the ‘plane’ silhouettes, you will not see any plane parts or anything on the sidewalks! They are pristine. Only thing you see laying around is a) aluminum cladding in their original full length strips and b) a paper passport of a ‘terrorist’ who stood up a week later to do an interview on the BBC!
That’s it, folks!
Now, in my opinion (and you can argue this if you like), the air national guard *did* in fact shoot down a plane over Pennsylvania as well as one entering the airspace of Camp David. These were both reported on Russian live TV that day and then never repeated again. Given that the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon was nuclear (and purposely disabled), that put the government into fear that those 2 planes were in fact carrying nuclear warheads so they shot them down. This puts the government into the awkward and very uncomfortable position of having to defend the bullshit ‘jetliners hit the towers’ cover up story because they must cover up that the planes were shot down over PA and Camp David and pretend that they made it all the way to the towers (despite the fact that was over an hour later).
I think the missing photos and the fake video acted like a curtain at a magic show.
The key ingredient at magic shows is 1. blocking and 2. misdirection and video edited helps and 3. helpers and shills to sell the story. If all same shills sold magic shows as real i.e NIST, how many people would start buying that crap too? I would say close to the same amount of people who believe the offical 9/11 Theory, which is total crap.
Why did NIST remove 3,370 files because “might jeopardize public safety”? or because drones were photographed by the NYPD with their film based SLR’s?
Tape of Air Traffic Controllers Made on 9/11 Was Destroyed
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/07/us/tape-of-air-traffic-controllers-made-on-9-11-was-destroyed.html
Oddly, the Verizon wireless record shows that 19 calls were made from Beamer’s cell phone long after the crash of UA 93.
http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20130516-909978.html
“Finally, although the FBI conducted a massive investigation into the calls, none of the telephone billing, nor any of the cell phone location data stored in standard phone company records has been publicly released. ” Why? Inside JOB moron!!
HELP FLIGHT 175′s ELLEN MARIANI PRESS FOR 9/11 TRUTH
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sMaeA8traLg
Scott Smith the two engines and some more would have probably made it thru the outer column shell and by all rights the plane should be crumpled up hanging outta the building, my question with noplanes is was the penitation hole a vid fake or was it a actual set charge explosive, the debris seems to be bent inward?
I was thinking about that and what I came up with is cables pulling on the columns with cutters going off. That’s the only way I can see that happening. Cables are used all the time.
The other issue is the engines should be more smashed don’t you think. I mean not a single part of that cooling duck looked the least damaged. I am sure it could still work. The buildings were designed with narrow office windows 18 inches (46 cm), so the engines or at least one engine didn’t fly between the columns.
You are a chimp wearing a tophat. CNN used at least two faked videos to improve ratings. You have seen them, evidently. See the shots and video material of that poor lady waving from the hole in the side of the WTC I or II. The exterior steel art at that level was individually convoluted members in the form of assembled panels using stock of 1/4 and 7/16 inches thickness, which was welded and riveted together. Read the bloody spech sheets and stop the B.S. Your name calling is fool inspired. Cars of today sport frames less than 1/8 of an inch thick. Duh But no way could these jets have severed enough core steel columns to tip these buildings to thus activate the original demolition systems to bring them down. That took demolition experts who are evidenced to have gained access to the elevator towers a few weeks or days before 9-11-2001, at the security company’s pleasure and convenience.