Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By Tom Dennen, the paranoid historian (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

911 – A 47-Story Building Filled With Criminal Evidence Against the US Govt “Fell Down All By Itself” on that Day

Saturday, July 6, 2013 18:25
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

I spent the whole of 2010 asking as many Americans as I could about Building Number Seven. Three people had heard of it.

It came down “in its own footprint” as the building demolishers put it, about five hours after the Twin Towers went down. WTC Building Number Seven, a 47-story steel frame structure, was completely undamaged before it collapsed in any known reckoning by a controlled demolition.creen>

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 13 comments
  • One aspect of this event that I recently learned of, and it changed the way I viewed it, is that WT1 and WT2 were connected underground by tunnels and passageways. With the collapse of WT1 and WT2, the tremendous damage done underground would have more that likely caused tremendous damage to the support structure of building 7. There are videos of someone yelling “they are going to pull it”, meaning demo it down. If the support structures underneath the street were badly damaged by the colaspse of the other buildings, dropping building 7 because of safety concerns is not the conspiracy which everyone is trying so hard to make it into. It seems like common sense when one thinks it through.

    • All the buildings, including Building 7, were connected underground with passageways and tunnels.

    • it takes waaaaayyy more then 5 hours to assay the damage,,, an get a demo crew in place ,, set the charges ,, an ‘pull’ the building out of safety concerns..

      an none of what you said was in the NIST report , anyway..

      • think it though..

      • It seems plausible to me that the sheer impact of the two WT’s would cause catastrophic failure to anything within it’s path – underground it would have been multiplied by a factor of, at the very least, 20. Those two buildings were huge and their double impact underground through the connected tunnels and passageways would have caused tremendous sound and vibrational damage. I think it is reasonable to consider it as a factor in “pulling” the building for safety concerns. Many of the underground support columns could have been so badly damaged that it would not require much to pull it down.

      • The sheer pressure of those two huge buildings falling would cause tremendous damage to any connected support structures underground.

      • what part of 5 hours are you having a problem thinking through..i’ll help you though it

    • Still would have been premeditated. So still a conspiracy .

      • Think of the Space Shuttle when it blasts off from the pad, where does all of that power through the fire which lifts it go? Through the vents on the bottom of the pad. Imagine two several hundred foot buildings that are connected by vents/passageways to another smaller building nearby with less structural support and no other exit point for the massive pressures, sounds, and vibrations of these two connected buildings to escape.

      • Of course it’s a ‘conspiracy’… where did these soooo unslick shills go to spy school? The John le Carre institute where only three totally interconnected and weakened buildings out of seven collapse “into their own footprints”?
        Spend ‘those five hours’ googling controlled demolitions and find ONE that does NOT come down lopsided, sheared off or otherwise… imperfectly.
        And then compare the absolute perfection of the collapse, in your now relative visual terms, of three separate buildings, all highly leveraged against age, asbestos insulation,a massive occupation of gov’t agencies, a BBC video that ‘confirmed’ the collapse of No 7 before it came down, and serious ‘anti-terror’ insurance taken out just a couple of weeks before… not to mention the sale of ‘put’ options on the airlines involved, a perfectly intact passport that was on one of the planes and, and, and, any further questions?
        Get a [email protected]

      • and and and the day before 9/10/01 sec of defense rumsfeld at 4:00 pm at a podium announced the pentagon lost 2.3 TRILLION dollars an probably wont be found.. they say stuff at 4:00 pm so it wont hit the news until the next day..

        the next day,, jesus christ could of appeared an the next days news would of squash his return..

        oh yeah,, guess where the unidentified flying object hit the pentagon. ??

        went right pass the pentagon to ohio sharp 180 an smashed into the back side.. knocked down 5 light poles skimmed a freeway an across the lawn at 580 miles an hour an hit the pentagon at 6 foot above ground level..right into the financial dept of that 2.3 trillion dollars..

        boy ,, that hjonni hasipor was some kinda ace pilot..

      • Crabby is right 2.3 trillion and all the gold from beneath the towers never found……you were raped america and didn,t do a thing about it……what a shame to be proud and cowards at the same time.

  • But Larry probably authorized the demolition – “the smartest thing to do is pull it” he said and looks like he meant it.
    /9-11-and-ground-zero/2013/06/the-smartest-thing-to-do-is-pull-it-larry-silverstein-2439908.html

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.