| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
“The smartest thing to do is pull it” – Larry Silverstein
Photo by New York Daily News – “designed NEW WTC-7 in April of 2000″.
When Silverstein said “pull it” was he referring to the explosive controlled demolition of the building?
In the end, whether or not Silverstein admitted to personally authorizing the controlled demolition of WTC 7 has no bearing on the evidence presented by AE911Truth. The scientific, forensic, and eyewitness evidence surrounding the building’s destruction proves beyond any reasonable doubt that it was intentionally demolished.
While Silverstein’s actions as the leaseholder of the Twin Towers and the owner of Building 7 should be thoroughly examined with suspicion only an unimpeachable independent criminal investigation can determine who was responsible for destroying the WTC skyscrapers.
Take Action – contact your local newspaper or congress people – did he say “pull it” – a control demolition?.
Causes – Contact Manhattan District Attorney – Irrefutable Scientific Evidence of Controlled Demolitions
12,000 Police Chiefs alerted – 9/11 demolition evidence. Investigate911 – Bring to Justice Those Responsible.
Bush Science – a new standard of deception.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyDabNfA8nk
9/11 – an act of preset explosives and control demolitions. The two Twin Towers brought down in approximately 9 seconds each and Building 7 in only 6.5 seconds.
http://www.opednews.com/Diary/How-Do-2-Planes-Bring-Down-by-Lance-Ciepiela-120907-434.html
The molten metal in the rubble was created by the highly energetic and explosive material that pulverized the Twin Towers.This material is the real smoking gun of 9-11 – it was used to destroy the towers and kill nearly 3,000 people on 9-11 and has killed and ruined the lives of thousands more.
http://www.bollyn.com/#article_13744
“How did the thermite get there?” Large quantities of it were present – not easily brought into the building and installed for controlled demolition without attracting notice. The first and most obvious person to question is Larry Silverstein, whose on-the-record and apparently careless remark that “we decided to pull it” appears to let slip an inside knowledge and a failure to realize that the time between the plane collisions to the two main towers and the collapse of WTC Building 7 would be insufficient to prepare to “pull it”, which is taken to mean a controlled demolition. There will also be renewed attention to witness reports of a full power-down of the WTC, the first in the life of the buildings on a weekend shortly before 9-11. http://mwcnews.net/focus/politics/5748-why-9-11-truth-has-won.html#sthash.RYrEy1St.dpuf
“I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me that THEY WERE NOT SURE THEY WERE GONNA BE ABLE TO CONTAIN THE FIRE, and I said, ‘WE’VE HAD SUCH TERRIBLE LOSS OF LIFE, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.’ And THEY [THE FDNY!] made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse.” –L. Silverstein
“We have never, ever heard the term ‘pull it’ being used to refer to the explosive demolition of a building, and neither has any blast team we’ve spoken with.” -Brent Blanchard of Protec in A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF WTC TOWERS 1, 2, & 7 FROM AN EXPLOSIVES AND CONVENTIONAL DEMOLITION VIEWPOINT
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf
(Check it yourself on any C/D contractor’s web site.)
If Larry Silverstein publicly admitted to blowing up his own property, why did Swiss Re, Lloyd’s, Zurich Financial, Copenhagen Re, and at least 8 other major insurers all pay him a total of $4.68 BILLION? They all fought his 2 planes = 2 incidents claims, and most of them won in court.
WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an
airplane exhibited all the characteristics of classic
controlled demolition with explosives:
1. Rapid onset of collapse
2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor – a second
before the building’s destruction
3. Symmetrical “structural failure” – through the path
of greatest resistance – at free-fall acceleration
4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its
own footprint – explosives loader, Tom Sullivan
5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic-like
clouds
6. Expert corroboration from the top European
controlled demolition professional
7. Foreknowledge of “collapse” by media, NYPD, FDNY
8. See also the 15-min documentary on WTC 7 by AE911Truth narrated by Ed Asner
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/o3hrpfopzp5qm6r/MMALzZp2ep/AIA%20letters/WTC%20Evidence%20Attachment%20for%20AIA%20Letter-RG-Suite.doc
Memo to United States Congress – “prima facie” evidence that Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld, committed treason on 9/11.
/9-11-and-ground-zero/2014/03/911-the-neocon-master-plan-2440624.html
Ask Richard Gage* and his “experts” to show you on video with audio how explosives or incendiaries secretly cut the 4.91″ flanges, 3.07″ webs, and 215 sq in cross sections of W14 X 730 columns like the 11 of 24 in WTC 7′s core, and the 4 corner columns in each tower’s core:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c2o8k4n9CY
http://www.ochshorndesign.com/cornell/writings/milstein-critique/images/8-fig04.png
If they ever HAD TO do it, this “debate” would be OVER.
*Gage’s ONLY 9/11 “research”:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFVi4qbN2jM
WTC 7 – Silverstein – Pull It – in Seven Parts
http://911truthout.blogspot.com/2015/01/the-phoenix-memo-and-wtc-7-silversteins.html