Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
Did you miss the introduction to this year’s campaign?
After reading about the farcical nature of the 9/11 Commission report in WTFact #49, it should be more apparent how disingenuous the effort of the commission was. No matter what your thoughts on the events of 9/11, one of the most notable unanswered questions centers around the massive military drills taking place prior to and on September 11th. The oft repeated theme during the benign investigation was whether the exercises impacted the ability to respond to the crisis. NORAD, North American Aerospace Defense Command, is a joint organization of Canada and the United States that provides aerospace warning, air sovereignty, and defense.
The war games being conducted on the morning of 9/11 were using many of the fighter jets that would have otherwise been available at air bases throughout the Northeast. Some of the war games involved remarkably similar scenarios of airliners being flown into buildings. The odds that a real event should occur the exact same day of a similar drill or exercise are 1-in who knows how many zeros.
This is a list of the exercises happening that day.
Global Guardian — annual command-level exercise organized by United States Strategic Command in coöperation with Space Command and NORAD.
Vigilant Guardian — semiannual NORAD exercise that had been running in conjunction with Global Guardian for several days and which postulated a bomber attack from the former Soviet Union.
Crown Vigilance — Air Combat Command
Apollo Guardian — Space Command
Amalgam Warrior, also going on, was related to Vigilant Guardian but there no known specifics.
Coincidentally, the Russian 37th Air Army was also conducting its own major bomber exercises across the Arctic and Atlantic.
Operation Tripod, scheduled for Sept. 12, was set up to “test the plan to distribute antibiotics to the entire city population during a bioterrorism attack”. Richard Sheirer, director of the New York City mayor’s Office of Emergency Management (OEM), had hired “over 1,000 Police Academy cadets and Fire Department trainees to play terrified civilians afflicted with various medical conditions, allergies, and panic attacks.” Various individuals were invited to watch, including Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, the police and fire commissioners, and representatives of the FBI and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). This exercise didn’t necessarily detract from measures related to hijacked planes, but they didn’t have far to go to help out with the real emergency that happened.
The Vigilant Guardian exercise definitely caused some confusion that day which was referenced most famously in chapter 1, footnote 116 of the 9/11 Commission Report. After initial FAA notification of the hijacked planes, the NEADS operator responded “Is this real world or exercise? FAA responds “No, this is not an exercise, not a test”. This is one of the more frequently heard clips of NORAD’s awareness.
More curiously, the standard operating procedures for dealing with hijacked airliners that had protected this country’s airspace for decades, were not followed on September 11, 2001 because earlier in the year, on May 31, Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld made sweeping changes which, among other things, required his prior authorization before military fighter jets could be scrambled to intercept threats.
In the first few days after 9/11, the military admitted that NORAD did not act until after the strike on the Pentagon at 9:38, although it was at 8:15 that morning that Flight 11 was known to be in trouble. Interceptions usually occur within 15 minutes, but on 9/11, 80+ minutes elapsed before any fighters were even airborne.
The standard operating procedures on intercepting planes had worked flawlessly 100 or more times a year, why change them then?
Subsequently, when the NORAD recordings were released and analyzed, NORAD, the 9/11 commission and the FAA were attempting was to divert attention from the high plausibility of a military stand down order, but the tapes confirmed the FAA did notify NORAD.
This Infowars article highlights the deception that the 10 member commission said they received from the Pentagon originally reported by the Washington Post.
In August 2006, the Washington Post reported, “Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon’s initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate.”
The report revealed how the 10-member commission deeply suspected deception to the point where they considered referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation.
From the same article, there’s quotes from Thomas Kean and James Farmer respectively, showing the panel was chasing it’s tail and they knew it.
“We to this day don’t know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us,” said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. “It was just so far from the truth.… It’s one of those loose ends that never got tied.”
Farmer himself is quoted in the Post article, stating, “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The [Norad air defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.”
If we’re to believe the 9/11 Report that the 19 fabled hijackers really pulled this off, they either got real lucky or had help to land on a day when most of the resources assigned to hijackings were unavailable. That has to make you wonder.
Here is another prime example from 9/11 Blogger of how the committee wasted America’s time and hid the truth, in this case by placing a lot of blame on the FAA.
The NORAD timeline indicated that during the crisis hours of 9/11, the FAA became increasingly slower in delivering alerts to NORAD. This seemed to shift the blame for the failed response to the FAA.
As late as May 2003, General Arnold of NORAD, sitting alongside Gen. Myers, presented a slightly revised version of NORAD’s Sept. 2001 timeline, in testimony to the Kean Commission. He revealed for the first time that NORAD was alerted about the hijacking of Flight 93, which crashed in Pennsylvania, at 9:16 a.m., a full 47 minutes before the claimed crash time at 10:03. But he stuck to the story about the other flights; in the case of AA77 which hit the Pentagon, the alert supposedly arrived at 9:24 am.
The FAA disputed Gen. Arnold’s testimony with a statement of May 21, 2003. The FAA claimed that regardless of the official notification times claimed by NORAD, phone bridges were established immediately after the initial attack (at 8:46). NORAD was informed in real time throughout of all developments, including about the plane that ultimately hit the Pentagon, the FAA said.
Thus for more than a year the FAA has been in open dispute with NORAD on the issue of who informed whom and when about the Sept. 11 hijackings; unfortunately, this has never become the major media story it deserves to be.
The Kean Commission itself intervened in June 2004. In a staff statement delivered at its final set of hearings (“Improvising a Homeland Defense”), the Commission outlined a chronology that completely ditched the timeline that NORAD had upheld for two years. It also effectively placed almost all of the blame for delayed air defense response on the FAA.
Gens. Arnold and Myers, who testified to the Commission that same morning, were not held to account for having presented an entirely wrong timeline a year earlier. Instead, they simply thanked the Kean Commission for clearing up the confusion. In return, one commissioner made a point of telling the generals they were not to blame; after all, it was all the FAA’s fault!
A group of FAA officials who testified in the subsequent, final session stuck by their old defense that they had in fact provided adequate and timely information to NORAD via the phone bridges. As the hearings concluded, they still disputed both timelines: the old one from NORAD, and the new one from the Kean Commission.
The discrepancies are readily apparent to anyone paying attention. With all these activities taking place, it’s easy to see that beyond the confusion, the sheer distance most of these aircraft were from their normal areas created large areas of unmanned airspace which is perfect if you don’t want any interference or witnesses to suspicious plane behavior and flight paths. The fact that these discrepancies did not raise more concern should put this in more context.
To gain more clarity, watch any one of the videos below
CBS News
Keith Olbermann
USA Today and other “mainstream” articles pointed out by Alex Jones
The exercises explained by Loose Change
The 47 min film “9/11 Intercepted“
Of Course The Order (Stand Down Orders in effect for 9/11) Still Stands – Dick Cheney
/9-11-and-ground-zero/2013/08/of-course-the-order-still-stands-dick-cheney-2440076.html