Have You Ever Seen Anything Like This? Is Child Euthanasia Coming To America? (Video)
Saturday, November 9, 2013 4:31
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
(N.Morgan) Another block in the Elite’s scheme for population control and eugenics. They are hiding this new scheme under the guise of assisted suicide/compassion or right to die. It is not up to the government to decide if we live or die. Yet, they are trying to take that role too, in their never ending need to control and dominate every asspect of our lives. Here in the US, Oregon passed the first legal euthanasia law in 1994 that allows assisted suicide for anyone 18 years of age or over who have a terminal illness. This is a form of euthanasia. In 2008, Washington passed its euthanasia bill and Vermont followed suit in May of this year.
In Europe, which seems to be paving the way for America’s socialist agenda, some form of euthanasia is legal in Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg and Switzerland. In Switzerland, doctors are allowed to assist a patient in their wish to die, but cannot actively perform the procedure causing the death. In the Netherlands, euthanasia is legal for anyone 12 years of age and over. Children 12 to 18 require parental consent.
Belgium, a once neutral nation, has led Europe with legal euthanasia for adults, passing their first laws in 2002. In 2003, 235 people in Belgium died from some form of euthanasia. In 2012, the number had risen to 1,432. In most instances, doctors give the patients a strong sedative to put them to sleep and then administer a solution that stops the heart. It’s very similar to the method used by veterinarians to put pets down.
The ruling political party in Belgium is the Socialist Party and they have introduced a bill that would allow euthanasia for children of all ages with parental consent. They claim that the bill is intended to give parents the options of ending the suffering of a child. Opponents argue that young children are unable to understand what’s involved in making such a decision to end their lives.
One of the most ardent opponents to the Belgium bill is the Christian Democratic Flemish Party. They have vowed to fight the bill and take it before the European Court of Human Rights if the bill passes.
Catholic Archbishop Andre-Joseph Leonard argued against the bill, saying:
“It is strange that minors are considered legally incompetent in key areas, such as getting married, but might (be able) to decide to die.”
Socialist governments have never held that human life is special or needs to be preserved. People are little more than livestock to them and like livestock, there are free to be slaughtered when necessary.
This is the same philosophy that pervades through the Democratic Party. If you check the euthanasia laws that have been introduced in the US, you will find that Democrats and socialists have been the ones behind them. They are the same people that so ardently defend the right to murder unborn children. If not stopped, euthanasia laws will become more prevalent throughout the US. The sanctity of life will be replaced with a socialist ideology that people are disposable. We’ll see doctors like Kermit Gosnell that will be able to legally kill a healthy newborn simply because the mother doesn’t want it. You’ll see parents legally murdering their children with Down’s syndrome and other conditions that require constant care.
Where will the line be drawn? What will determine whether a child or adult can be legally euthanized? The hedonistic debauchery that has over taken the American culture is bad enough, but what will happen when we begin to kill our children and loved ones simply because they are inconvenient to care for? Abortion is bad enough but euthanasia is nothing more than a barbaric and horrendous practice that will lead to God’s ultimate destruction of our nation, if He doesn’t do it any sooner.
More Stories:
Update: Blackout For November Confirmed: Power Grid Drill Nov 13, 14, 2013 (New Video Added)
US Militia Commander Tells Congress, You’re Running Out Of Time!! (Video)
Martial Law: Police Threaten To Plant Drugs And Beat Man If He Doesn’t Perform Sexual Favor (Video)
Govt Blank Checks Being Used By DHS And US Police State For Bullets And Unlimited Citizen Abuse (Videos)
Urgent: Updated Info About Confirmed Blackout Drills In The Next Few Weeks—New Info Added-(Videos)
Military Coup Imminent In USA? This Video Contains Shocking Information Of What May Be In Our Near Future (Video)
Martial Law Will Not Be Announced, It Will Just Happen (Videos )
More Stories Contributed By N. Morgan
Oregon passed the first legal euthanasia law in 1994 that allows assisted suicide for anyone 18 years of age or over who have a terminal illness. ??
um point of order, being alive is inevitably terminal.. no getting around it!
We have had legalized child euthanasia in America since 1973. It is called abortion.
After seeing someone you love who is terminal ill and is in the advanced stages of cancer, or a disease for which there is no known cure (or at least no which in the logical timeframe for which the dieting person may live to see)… If they”re in their 70′s / 80′s, it does make one ponder if they should really be made to suffer so greatly in the end, which can stretch on for many days in which they are in and out of consciousness, terribly uncomfortable, very ready to pass and quite frankly wishing for it…. It does make you wonder if they’re isn’t something more one can do, that is not playing god…
That said miracles do happen, albeit not all the time and does seem that some of life’s greatest lessons come from great personal suffering… Our perception of life is rather limited and by making the decision to end ones life prematurely, would you be saving yourself or a loved one from great suffering and anguish? or would you be killing any chance for a miracle and/or one of life’s hardest but maybe more important experiences that for some reason unknown to you/ us in this world, maybe vital to the next?
Hard to say… But it does seem that whenever man tries to put his 2-cents into “improving ” upon the natural way of earth, life, etc. It seems rather evident that eventually man ultimately realizes the hard way the greater purpose in what was first thought of as “needing improvement” and after suffering the consequences of his “improvement”, reverts back to the natural way with a greater appreciation for what was previously though as something that he could make better.
Well, what’s the problem the cattle (goyim) have with slaughter?
If someone is definitely going to die, it’s more humane to let that happen rather than prolong the pain and suffering. Most people are not afraid to die, but they are afraid of the pain that goes with it. I consider euthanasia or assisted death self defense against pain and suffering as opposed to a desire to die. As always in life, we try to defend and protect ourselves from harm …. and we should be able to do the same in the face of death.
I agree, Anon.
When my dad was at the end, to be honest, I prayed death would hurry.
He suffered so…
N. Morgan …. I had the same experience with my Mother who died of uterine cancer. She was in such pain that I prayed for her to pass on. It was a relief, but then I had to deal with her absence. Prayers to you for your suffering. xoxo
Prayers back to you, Anon..
Yes I understand completely.
No one needs to suffer as they die of a terminal illness. Hospice gives palliative treatment to the patient, which eliminates pain, nausea/vomiting and anxiety. They give the patient the assurance of a peaceful death at home in familiar surroundings, and provide the family all the support they need in coping with the impending loss of their loved one. Because the family is involved in the patient’s care, they are left with a sense of pride and comfort, knowing they gave that loved one the sweetest gift they could–a chance to leave this earth in peace, surrounded with family and friends in the environment where they felt safe. Don’t allow your terminally ill loved one to die in a noisy, impersonal hospital! Put them on hospice care and take them home! From a hospice RN.
I hate to say this, but sometimes family doesn’t respect the wishes of the dying person.
If it had been my way, my dad wouldn’t have suffered at all.
I agree with you, Anon.
For me it is simple.I did not have anything to say when i got in this word but now that i am here,i do not want any body else than me to decide if i want to dy or not.They should instal a sisteme whit docteurs who get the signature of the patience and one doctor who perform the euthanasia and another one to signe the paper whit the regard of civilian to make shure they dont kill peaple for fun.
Look this might sound horrible but let me put it like this. There are types of brain cancer that make it impossible for you to shut your eyes, so not only are you in terrible pain you can’t sleep. and the state is going to tell you you DON’T have the right to end that suffering? there are some terrible illnesses out there that are un-treatable or just unmanageable with pain medication. And your trying to say that to end that suffering is WRONG? Many of the people using this option are terminal and while I don’t agree with suicide. it’s not my place to tell someone else how much they HAVE to suffer through. Do you have any idea how long people fought to HAVE this right? I swear there are just too many people in this world arguing about things they know nothing about. They are just reacting on feelings alone without really looking into the reasons these options have been put into place. NO ONE is talking about killing healthy children for God’s sake. I’m so tired of people flying off the handle at the slightest different idea. research people research!!!!! With love Earth muffin33
I agree adults have the right to choose this, but the scary thing is the government wants to make the choice for you.
This, I take personally, I myself am ill.
They may decide my life isn’t viable.
They may decide that my life isn’t worth saving.
This is why we should be concerned about this.
The choice won’t be ours, but this tyrannical government.
Euthanasia is a slippery slope, once it’s allowed for any purpose it will be expanded upon, and once state funded healthcare is enacted the choice is no longer in an individuals hands and there are soon no longer individuals in the eyes of the state. It’s not worth the risk to allow it due to the fact that it will in the end become a means of reducing costs rather than pain and suffering.
Historically speaking, the writing is on the wall there isn’t it Neil?
Adults SHOULD have the right to end their life if they want to PERIOD……..
The only reason there is a law, is for those who want assistance…..all the rest just commit suicide….. each human life DOES matter, but each person should have say over THEIR LIFE !!!!
The Target ad keeps popping up while trying to read the article.
That’s a good way to turn folks away from the site.
I don’t believe that is by accident though Target seems to be the theme of the day.
Well said
If your loved one is terminal and in the last days of life, they have the right to decide when the end comes, its called Hospice. My mother fought stage 3 ovarian cancer for 7 years. She woke up on a Thursday, decided she didn’t want to fight anymore and by midnight on Saturday she was gone.
There is a significant difference between making a person comfortable in their last days or allowing them personally to commit suicide and having a doctor do it and most particularly having the state decide who dies.
Doctors have no business killing patients. This has been accepted since ancient times. To do otherwise will cause doctors to be distrusted and health outcomes to fall, actually increasing the number of people the doctors will get to kill.
The people who support euthanasia are also rather short sighted. They don’t seem to realize how the qualifiers keep expanding and will one day include themselves with no choice on their part. But then they won’t figure that out until they are the ones with an at that point curable affliction but for some reason the state decides they need to die instead of being treated.
Looking at recent history, all socialist regimes have relied on mass executions. Few have practiced it as openly on adults as Hitler, Stalin and Mao, but have used rationing of health care via the socialized system to ensure that many of the sick got sick enough that they’d likely die before too much treatment was needed. If they did get treatment it was substandard and resulted in high death rates that the US and other freer systems.
Abortion has been another way that kind has sated its bloodlust. However, even that is no longer providing the kick it used to, much as the body can develop a tolerance for many drugs. So, in the US even they are floating the idea of killing children of up to two years of age. Not much support for that, yet, but once the US health care system is nationalized and incomes continue to collapse, that could easily change.
I agree with you, about compassionate care.