Carney Interview Proves EU Referendum Essential

Former Police Detective Rowan Bosworth-Davies

And this is the root of the problem.

 The banking industry in the UK has become hijacked by a an organised criminal fraternity who see the bank sector as their own personal fiefdom, within which they can manoeuvre to make obscene sums of money, way and beyond any meaningful relationship to the services they provide or the skills they possess.

By John Ball

Quoted in the Telegraph Mark Joseph Chicken Little Carney fearmongers as to the “uncertainty” that might occur should the serfs of Britain obtain the long awaited holy grail of an EU OUT referendum. Carney represents himself, the banking ponzi scheme and Goldman Sachs whose agents control much of the corrupt EU.

David Cameron’s plans for a referendum on Britain’s membership of the European Union are “bad” for the economy and could hamper investment, the governor of the Bank of England has warned.

Mark Carney said that the prospect of a referendum will create “uncertainty” for businesses and mean that they “hold off” on investment.

Carney as an advisor is not credible, he clearly seeks to further the precious EU project by stfling a referendum.

“uncertainty” ?

Hmmm how well did the BOFE predict and prevent the last crisis ?

Hmmm how well is our country being ruled over by Brussels and how is their track record for corruptioin ?
Carney  Born March 16, 1965 (age 48) Fort Smith, Northwest Territories, Canada a “former” Goldman Sachs man is big chief of the crooked Bank of England.  Co-incidentally many EU senior bankers and chiefs are also connected to Goldman Sachs club.    What possible reservations might we have as to his true motives.

The representative of a corrupt banking sector wishes us to remain in the creation of the corrupt banking sector the corrupt EU the ponzi finances of which are controlled by former Goldman Sachs colleagues, what could possibly go wrong ?

As a foreign national how can the loyalty of unelected Carney be assured and what business of his is it to interfere in a matter of British sovereignty ?

What has Carney done since being crowned King of the Bank of England to curtail the expanding list of financial crimes that have led to and are still leading to  “uncertainty”  and why have no senior fat cat bankers been jailed for their crimes.

Fraud.

Debasement of the currency. (Quantative Easing)

War on Savers and Pensions ( Zero interest  / low rates great for banking chums terrible for savers. )  Causes higher prices inflation.

The Fraudulent creation of currency as interest bearing debt / negotiable instruments. This  when creating money as non interest bearing credit ie the Bradbury Pound used circa WW1.

Slavery – Of the British people to an interest bearing currency ( so called national debt ) which is not necessary except for the purpose of  enriching banking parasites.

Money Laundering for terrorists and drug dealers

Forex rigged.

Libour rigged.

Comex rigged.

Commodity prices rigged.

Property price bubble.

Let us not forget the long history of criminality within the debt enslaving Bank of England and associate banking crime syndicate.  For instance BOFE collaborating with the Nazi Bank of International Settlements BIS during the war.  Funding the very people that we were fighting against.

The BIS was founded in 1930, in effect by Montagu Norman and his close friend Hjalmar Schacht, the former president of the Reichsbank, known as the father of the Nazi economic miracle. Schacht even referred to the BIS as “my” bank. The BIS is a unique hybrid: a commercial bank protected by international treaty. Its assets can never be seized, even in times of war. It pays no taxes on profits. The Czechoslovaks believed that the BIS’s legal immunities would protect them. But they were wrong.

The Bank of England’s historian argued that to refuse the transfer order would have been a breach of Britain’s treaty obligations with regard to the BIS. In fact there was a powerful counter-argument that the Nazi invasion of Czechoslovakia had rendered any such obligations null and void as the country no longer existed.

A key sentence in the Bank of England documents is found on page 1,295. It reads: “The general attitude of the Bank of England directors of the BIS during the war was governed by their anxiety to keep the BIS to play its part in the solution of post-war problems”. And here the secret history of the BIS and its strong relationship with the Bank of England becomes ever more murky.

During the war the BIS proclaimed that it was neutral, a view supported by the Bank of England. In fact the BIS was so entwined with the Nazi economy that it helped keep the Third Reich in business. It carried out foreign exchange deals for the Reichsbank; it accepted looted Nazi gold; it recognised the puppet regimes installed in occupied countries, which, together with the Third Reich, soon controlled the majority of the bank’s shares.

Indeed, the BIS was so useful for the Nazis that Emil Puhl, the vice-president of the Reichsbank and BIS director, referred to the BIS as the Reichsbank’s only “foreign branch”.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/bank-of-england/10213988/Never-mind-the-Czech-gold-the-Nazis-stole….html