| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
UN Small Arms Treaty: Eighty Million Determined Gun Owners Should be Quite an Obstacle Its Enforcement
David Risselada / Freedom Outpost
I want to talk about the United Nations Small Arms Treaty. I have written a couple of articles about it before, but in light of some recent developments, like the European Union calling for the ratification of the treaty among European Union states, it may be time to discuss it again. Also, let’s not forget the UN just issued resolution 2117, which calls for member states to collect civilian arms and destroy them. My friends, you only need to look at Australia, Canada and Britain to see that civilian disarmament is their goal.
To truly understand what is at stake here you simply need to look at the state of the country and how the left uses propaganda to distort everything. My friends, provisions are written into the treaty which authorize the United Nations to act as peace keepers within the borders of “conflict areas.” What is happening here in our country? The United States could very well be considered an “unstable” region in the event of an economic collapse. The fact that many Americans are vigorously standing for their Second Amendment rights while it has been written into policy that doing so makes you a terrorist, could be all the excuse the UN needs in the event of this treaty’s ratification. Escalating tensions over the erosion of our constitutional rights could very well see the deployment of UN troops to deescalate tensions, and disarm so called “hostile” parties. That would be the patriots defending liberty of course.
Understand that this treaty puts all control of firearms production into the hands of government while drastically diminishing your rights to own them. Also, understand that nowhere in the treaty is the right to self-defense recognized by the UN, nor is the right to self-defense a recognized right in the UN Charter of human rights. What they do promise, however, is the right to be secure in a social and “international order” in which their interpretation of human rights can be fully realized. Better wake up folks; I don’t think they are on the same page as you and me.
why would anyone acept a treaty over the constitution? no treaty is ubove the constitution when there is a conflick between the two the constitution over rides it by makeing it null and void. the constitution belongs to the people it is ours and the goverment has no athority to take it , its not theirs to take. the constitution was put in place to keep the power of the goverment in the peoples hands, it doesnt bolster the goverment ,it keeps them from becomeing a monark type of rule. it holds the goverment in checks and balances by three branches that keeps the goverment fallowing it and we people are the 4th branch to keep the other three honest. what the hell happened? how could a secerate behind closed door shadow goverment exsist to controll our goverment and not be stopped dead in its tracks? how can anyone except a communist agenda from the un over the constitution and bill of rights? wake up people its time to kick some ass.