| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Purpose of Prison
What is the point of prison? What is it we expect to happen via some mystical act of hiding someone away behind a 20 foot wall?
I wish I could point to some profound piece of law; Or guide you to a deeply insightful Parliamentary discussion that encompassed teasing out the nuances of State power, the uncomfortable realities of inflicting suffering on citizens. You will know that such debates haven't yet taken place.
The best I can give you – apart from Chapter One of any criminal justice textbook – is Prison Rule number 3: The Purpose of Prison Training and Treatment. You will appreciate how little attention is paid to this grandly titled Rule when I point out it once held the place of Rule 1. It slides down the list as time passes.
Rule 3 states that, “The purpose of the training and treatment of convicted prisoners shall be to encourage and assist them to lead a good and useful life”.
Note those words: encourage…assist…useful life…. And note the complete absence of the word “punishment”. Indeed, the Prison Rules are denuded of that word, as if by its literary absence then the reality of prison is somehow more amenable. Even punishments issued as part of the internal disciplinary process are smuggled into existence by being called “awards”. I “won” a few awards over the years, mostly resulting in solitary confinement. An award in prison is not one to be sought after.
Punishment, then, seems to have been forgotten in the Rules. The punitive element of imprisonment is reduced to t6hat inherent in the act of imprisonment – the loss of liberty. Not liberties, please note; but liberty. This is an error that many make. And the loss of liberty is grievously underestimated by those who have never suffered it, by those who insist that imprisonment must be accompanied by imposing harsh treatment and hard regimes.
The Rules are clear. Which makes it rather pathetic that Ministers insist on reaching down from their vast and comfortable official perches into the cells of prisoners, to tweak the penitents lives just to make them a little bit more miserable. Not out of some great penological or criminological urge to reduce crime, but in the politicians perpetual quest to grub for votes and to retain their clammy hold on power.
To take Rule 3 on its face – let's pretend? – it might be asked just what in prison life either encourages or assists prisoners to live a good and useful life? Is it the overcrowding? The meagre family contact? The forced penury? Being forced to work for the profit of outside companies? The ambivalent healthcare? Being compelled to crap in front of cellmates, strangers?
These are structural indecencies, requiring no input from prison staff. This is the way prison is designed to be – degrading and empty of significant positive purpose. An hour in any prison is enough to suggest that far from encouraging a future “good and useful life”, prisons foster a sense of anger, injustice and resentment. And a 60% reoffending rate.
I have tried to imagine what a prison would look like if it did aspire to actually adhere to Rule 3. It was so far removed fromj my experience that I failed. Utterly.
Source: http://prisonerben.blogspot.com/2014/06/purpose-of-prison.html
