Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Will Obama’s Border Chaos Spark Revolution?

Wednesday, July 9, 2014 13:45
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Exclusive: Morgan Brittany on administration action: ‘It is classic Cloward-Piven’

WND

MORGAN BRITTANY

Back on March 16, 2012, Barack Obama signed an executive order that went virtually unnoticed by the mainstream media and a majority of the America public. It was titled the National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order, and it completely erased any judicial oversight or due process for any action by the government deemed in the interest of national security. Previous to this executive order, on Dec. 31, 2011, the president signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which allowed for indefinite military detention without charge or trial for the first time in our history. This would enable the current and future presidents to allow provisions and authorizations for the military to pick up and indefinitely detain people captured anywhere in the world away from any battlefield.

Supposedly, the NDAA broadens the scope and power of the federal government to fight the War on Terror, and under this law the military has the power to carry out domestic anti-terrorism operations on U.S. soil. This means it allows the detaining of U.S. citizens domestically without trial if they are considered a threat. The question then becomes: Who is a threat? Is it a member of the tea party? Someone who speaks out against Obamacare or takes issue with the administration’s policies? Someone the NSA has listened to and feels is a problem? We saw what happened with the IRS targeting – can military arrests be far behind? This idea would be considered folly except for the fact that in 2009 there was a DHS report entitled “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalism and Recruitment.” It specifically stated that conservatives and the unemployed represent a clear and present danger.

Ever since the executive order of March 2012 took effect there have been massive changes in many government departments. For instance, the Department of Homeland Security has stockpiled more than 1.6 billion rounds of hollow-point ammunition, 7,000 fully automatic 5.56×45 mm NATO personal defense weapons, plus a huge amount of 30-round high-capacity magazines. Enough to fight a major war, don’t you think? As if that weren’t enough, the DHS recently purchased and retrofitted over 2,799 Mine Resistant Armored Protection vehicles from the U.S. Army. Other departments have been stockpiling as well. The Social Security Administration and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) are just two others.

So when you put the pieces of this puzzle together and you see what is happening on our border, am I crazy to think that this was all a plan that has been put in motion to overwhelm the system and create anger and chaos among the American people? With the influx of illegal children surrendering to the Border Patrol, the officers can no longer protect the border because they are too busy changing diapers and tending to sick kids. They are overwhelmed and cannot feed, house or nurse these thousands of people.

Read More Here

Reposted with permission

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 5 comments
  • Will Obama’s Border Chaos Spark Revolution?

    We can only hope.

    The lawless, totally corrupt regime in Washington has nothing in common with the government our founding fathers put into place.

    • Reminder: House defunded the Secure Fence Act of 2006 (Kay Bailey Hutchison on the Senate side)

      Posted on ‎6‎/‎20‎/‎2013‎ ‎8‎:‎58‎:‎31‎

      Update 10:58pm Eastern: Yeah, I’m watching C-SPAN. The motion to concur in the House amendments to HR2764, the omnibus spending bill, just passed…76-17, with 1 present.

      Update 10:20pm Eastern. Sen. Jim DeMint is on the Senate floor right now blasting the omnibus bill for gutting the fence, removing the ban on sanctuary cities, and funding illegal alien lawyers.

      The fence gets robbed, but the spending bill gives $10 million in “emergency” funding for attorneys of illegal immigrants?!!?!

      Fence? What fence?

      I’ve warned several times that the border fence expansion was gesture politics. We’ve watched Democrats and Republicans undermine the Secure Fence Act repeatedly since it was passed. Open-borders zealots joined with Big Business types to stall and protest construction. It ain’t a fence. It’s a FINO: Fence in Name Only. Here’s more confirmation of the fence farce via the Washington Times:

      Congress last night passed a giant new spending bill that undermines current plans for a U.S.-Mexico border fence, allowing the Homeland Security Department to build a single-tier barrier rather than the two-tier version that has worked in California…The 2006 Secure Fence Act specifically called for “two layers of reinforced fencing” and listed five specific sections of border where it should be installed. The new spending bill removes the two-tier requirement and the list of locations.

      Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, the Texas Republican who has led the charge to change the 2006 law, said she wants to give Homeland Security more flexibility and wants local officials and landowners to be consulted.

    • By Stephen Dinan

      The Washington Times

      Tuesday, June 18, 2013

      Related Stories
      CBO: Immigration bill only stops 25 percent of illegal immigration
      Speaker John Boehner: House GOP majority must back any immigration bill

      Senators on Tuesday rejected building the 700 miles of double-tier border fencing Congress authorized just seven years ago, with a majority of the Senate saying they didn’t want to delay granting illegal immigrants legal status while the fence was being built.

      The 54-39 vote to reject the fence shows the core of the immigration deal is holding. The vote broke mostly along party lines, though five Republicans, including Sen. Marco Rubio and the rest of the bill’s authors, voted against the fence, and two Democrats voted for it.

      Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jun/18/senate-rejects-border-fence/#ixzz372dEgF4D

  • This surely has the republic upset, but in my opinion the revolution will not start until they try to take the guns away.

    The only thing keeping them from completely running rough shot all over the country is the second amendment.

    The founders were smart enough to know 238 years ago that some one or groups would try to usurp power over our freedoms. That is why it is the 2nd only following our 1st to tell big Gov to go get bent.

    III% :grin:

  • it happing in Germany in 1933

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.