An ethical person – like a politician, banker or lawyer – may know right from wrong, but unlike a politician, a moral person lives it. “Marx and Engels never tried to refute their opponents with argument. They insulted, ridiculed, derided, slandered, and traduced them, and in the use of these methods their followers are not less expert. Their polemic is directed never against the argument of the opponent, but always against his person.” – Socialism http://chasvoice.blogspot.com/
This is how our Republic can be restored… gradual, but non-violent and effective. It’d pretty much be accomplished anyway with or without the Texas federal judge. No doubt Washington federal magistrates will be grateful for states’ helping them get back on track under our country’s Rule of Law.
In this Nov. 14, 2005, photo, US Southern District Judge Andrew S. Hanen, left, stands for the Pledge of Allegiance during a ceremony in Brownsville, Texas. (AP Photo/The Brownsville Herald, Brad Doherty, File)
(Newser) – A federal judge in Texas has issued an order banning officials from implementing “any and all aspects” of President Obama’s executive order on immigration, just two days before the first applications for deferred deportation were to be received. US District Judge Andrew Hanen decided that a lawsuit led by Texas and joined by 25 other states satisfied legal requirements, reports the New York Times. “The court finds that the government’s failure to secure the border has exacerbated illegal immigration into this country,” which “significantly drains the states’ resources,” he wrote, calling failure to enforce immigration laws “both dangerous and unconscionable” and temporarily suspending programs that could defer deportation for around 5 million people.
The ruling was hailed by Texas officials, including Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, who said it had checked “the president’s attempt to bypass the will of the American people,” reports the Los Angeles Times. But supporters of Obama’s immigration order say the ruling is just the first step in a long legal battle, and legal scholars tell the New York Times that an appeals court is almost certain to lift Hanen’s ruling. The judge, who has been on the federal bench since 2002, was assigned the immigration case through an automated system, reports the AP, which notes that Hanen wasn’t known for being outspoken on immigration until a case in 2013, when he accused the federal government of taking part in a “criminal conspiracy” by reuniting a child smuggled from El Salvador with her mother, who was in the US illegally.