Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Cops Asked To Check On Welfare Of Man, They Break In And Shoot Him Dead

Thursday, March 19, 2015 12:57
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

There seems to be a big problem with the police taking on a shoot first mentality, before even thinking or considering other safer options to do their job right. Rather than the taking of innocent lives. Once again but this time it was in Canada. Police were called to check on a man that maybe needed some profession help, rather than a policeman taking target practice on him and riddling the man with 5 bullets instead.

Infowars.com

Police are not trained to deal with disturbed individuals

Police in Canada shot dead a man after the hotel he was staying in called them to carry out a welfare check, providing yet another tragic example of what can often happen when you call cops to deal with a disturbed individual.

Staff at the Super 8 Motel in Calgary called the cops after the 27-year-old man was witnessed behaving erratically.

The police report states that officers went to the man’s room and attempted to gain entry with a motel key, but found the door locked on the chain from the inside.The man inside was described as agitated and in need of medical attention. He refused officers access to the room. After calling EMS, the cops opted to kick down the door and go in guns drawn, for some unfathomable reason.

Read More Here

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 1 comment
  • Licensed to kill by the corporate gv masquerading as a gov. When will the people learn?

    Governments Have Descended to the Level
    of
    Mere Private Corporations
    Supreme Court Building
    Clearfield Doctrine
    Supreme Court Annotated Statute, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-
    371 1942
    Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute: Clearfield Trust Co. v.
    United States 318 U.S. 363-371 1942: “Governments descend to the level of a mere
    private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen . . . where
    private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is
    concerned . . . For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as
    entities entirely separate from government.”
    What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private commercial paper is used by
    corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no
    different than a mere private corporation.
    As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private
    corporations which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific
    performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government,
    like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other
    commercial agreement between it and the one upon who demands for specific
    performance are made.
    And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial
    agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called
    statutes.
    This case is very important because it is a 1942 case that was decided after the UNITED
    STATES CORPORATIOON COMPANY filed its “CERTIFICATE OF
    INCORPORATION” in the State of Florida (July 15, 1925). And it was decided AFTER
    the ‘corporate government’ agreed to use the currency of the private corporation, the
    FEDERAL RESERVE. The private currency, the Federal Reserve Note, is still in use
    today.
    References:
    (i) Articles of Incorporation of UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY
    http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/articles-of-incorporation-of-u-scorp-
    company.pdf
    (ii) From The Great American Adventure by Judge Dale, retired. (pages 93-94)
    http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/the-great-american-adventurecomplete-
    work-by-judge-dale.pdf
    [4] Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they
    are a fiction and only exist on paper.
    5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private
    corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to
    conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You
    bet they do!
    6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate
    or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS,
    which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of
    Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did
    you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes?
    For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued
    for violating their corporate regulations?
    [8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law
    enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the
    SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their
    actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
    (iii) Our Government is Just Another Corporation
    http://anticorruptionsociety.com/is-our-government-just-another-corporation/

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.