The hugely well known internet site BuzzFeed has just published the outcome of its research into Mrs. Clinton’s statements that all her grandparents were immigrants – an affirmation that could increase the candidate’s position with a major constituency identified to be essential to Democrats’ electoral hopes.

And as the BuzzFeed post factors in, this provably phony Clinton claim is being replicated as she roll-outs her strategy in Iowa this week, setting up small, personal events with allegedly “everyday” people.

“Speaking in Iowa Wednesday, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that all her grandparents had immigrated to the United States, a story that conflicts with public census and other records related to her maternal and paternal grandparents.”

The BuzzFeed article provides a number of photographs of census data that obviously reveal Hillary is lieing about her so-called “immigrant” grandparents.

It has been recently discovered how Hillary Rodham Clinton expects a groundbreaking transformation and the constructing of a new modern culture set up on Marxist concepts.

Hillary Rodham Clinton is an evil person who has been trained that the United States has to transform to a more Socialistic/Marxist manner. She was in opposition to the Vietnam War and directed protests towards it, demonstrating her neglect for the military and what they were undertaking to attempt and hold Communism at bay in Vietnam.

That did not make a difference to Hillary at all; her concepts were more like Stalin and Hitler than any of our concepts of the United States.

Hillary served as one of nine editors of the Yale Review of Law and Social Action, where she worked collaboratively with Mickey Kantor (who, more than two decades later, would serve as U.S. Trade Representative and U.S. Commerce Secretary under President Bill Clinton) and Robert Reich (who would serve as Bill Clinton’s Labor Secretary from 1993 to 1997). “For too long,” said the Yale Review, “legal issues have been defined and discussed in terms of academic doctrine rather than strategies for social change.” The publication was replete with articles by or about such radicals as William Kunstler, Charles Reich (author of The Greening of America); Jerry Rubin (who wrote a piece exhorting parents to “get high with our seven-year-olds,” and urging students to “kill our parents”); and Charles Garry (the civil rights attorney who defended Black Panther Party members accused of murder). The Fall and Winter 1970 editions of the Yale Review, on which Hillary worked as associate editor, focused heavily on the trials of Black Panthers who had been charged with murder. Numerous cartoons in those issues depicted police officers as hominid pigs.[3]

[3] Ibid., pp. 59-61.
Barbara Olson, Hell to Pay (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 1999), pp. 59-59
Ibid., pp. 59-61.

Hillary Rodham Clinton got a Yale professor referred to as Thomas Emerson (known as “Tommy the Commie”), who presented her to Charles Gary, and this is where it got truly fascinating, as she got privately engaged with the protection of numerous Black Panthers who tormented a person with boiling water, mutilated one of their own participants, and focused on other horrific functions.

Though evidence of the defendants’ guilt was overwhelming, Hillary – as part of her coursework for Professor Emerson – attended the Panther trials and arranged for shifts of fellow students to likewise monitor court proceedings and report on any civil-rights abuses allegedly suffered by the defendants. (Those abuses could then be used, if the Panthers were to lose their case, as grounds for appeal.) Striving to neutralize what she considered the pervasive racism of the American legal system, “Hillary was,” as Barbara Olson observed in Hell to Pay, “a budding Leninist.”

Hillary quit college remaining referred to as a future Leninist, her ideology in line with the Communist party. Why would the United Sates desire to have Hillary Rodham Clinton as the President of the United States when, matching to her learning, the United States had to transform from a free culture into a Marxist or Communist culture?

But it does get more painful. As Hillary Rodham Clinton migrated on through her college days, she started to be more in-line with the ideology that the United States was not good for her concepts or those of her advisors, one of whom she kept a high regard (Saul Alinsky).

To demonstrate how much she hated the United States engagement in the Vietnam War, Hillary Rodham Clinton performed the following:

In 1970, Hillary chaired a meeting where Yale Law School students voted in favor of joining a national strike against the Vietnam War.

Hillary Rodham Clinton would not come to feel very positive when it come to the Vietnam veterans, and would not help to make a good commander in chief with this kind of history.

She also made sure several Veterans would be able to report as scrupulous objectors. Hillary Rodham Clinton did this even while being employed for the communist law firm to demonstrate where her heart actually was.

Also in 1972, she went to Berkeley to work as an intern at her hand-picked law firm: Treuhaft, Walker, and Bernstein. Founded by current or former members of the Communist Party USA, this firm had long acted as a legal asset not only for the CPUSA but also for the Black Panthers and other Bay-area radicals. Founding partner Bob Treuhaft, head of the California Communist Party, had been labeled one of the nation’s most dangerously subversive lawyers. According to historian Stephen Schwartz, “Treuhaft is a man who dedicated his entire legal career to advancing the agenda of the Soviet Communist Party and the KGB.” Hillary did yeoman’s work while learning at the feet of Treuhaft and his fellow masters. Associates say that Hillary, during her tenure with the firm, helped draftees get themselves declared conscientious objectors so they could avoid serving in Vietnam; they also contend that Hillary served VA interns seeking to avoid taking a loyalty oath to the United States.

Also in the early 1970s, Hillary developed a close acquaintanceship with Robert Borosage, who would later become a major figure in such leftist organizations as the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), the Campaign for America’s Future, and Institute for America’s Future. Hillary herself (along with Bill Clinton) would go on to develop close political ties with IPS; moreover, she would give that organization a great deal of money to further its cause.

Hillary Rodham Clinton did, in reality, get included with some of the most left leaning organizations out there, some even being regarded as Communist front organizations.

In the 1970s, she began distributing her concepts that women, children, and minorities were being detested by a white male-driven culture.

Viewing America as an authoritarian, patriarchal, male-dominated society that tended to oppress women, children, and minorities, Hillary wrote a November 1973 article for the Harvard Educational Review advocating the liberation of children from “the empire of the father.” She claimed that the traditional nuclear family structure often undermined the best interests of children, who “consequently need social institutions specifically designed to safeguard their position.” “Along with the family,” she elaborated, “past and present examples of such arrangements include marriage, slavery, and the Indian Reservation system.” She added: “Decisions about motherhood and abortion, schooling, cosmetic surgery, treatment of venereal disease, or employment, and others where the decision or lack of one will significantly affect a child’s future should not be made unilaterally by parents.”

In today’s culture, what Hillary Rodham Clinton expressed back in 1973 appears like precisely what she says nowadays. She calls for, “the liberation of children from the empire of the father.” Possibly this is why our families are falling away from each other today-because concepts like those of Hillary Rodham Clinton desire to demean the father figure in the home and make him look like a ruling master? Hillary Rodham Clinton appeared like a genuine Communist back then, and it would not appear too unrealistic to believe she harbors those same concepts right now.

But Hillary Rodham Clinton has not come to be on her own-she has had a lot of assistance and, in some instances, sketchy positions to high profile jobs. Take, for example, her 1976 period when she got bumped up the ladder only because of her then hubby, Bill Clinton.

In 1976 Mrs. Clinton worked for Jimmy Carter‘s successful presidential campaign. Soon thereafter, she found employment as an attorney with the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, Arkansas, where she would continue to work until 1992. According to political analyst and former Clinton advisor Dick Morris, “She [Hillary] had no job offers in Arkansas and only got hired by the University of Arkansas Law School at Fayetteville because Bill was already teaching there. She only joined the prestigious Rose Law Firm after Bill became Attorney General, and made partner only after he was elected governor.”

Comming up there will be a lot more of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s history and how it came to be under some very fascinating situations. And there may be other posts to demonstrate her transactions with the numerous scandals associated with her.

To summarize, I have to convey that, as Hillary Rodham Clinton’s past is revealed, it will be demonstrated that she is even worse a person than Obama, as she did not conceal her past, and that alone demonstrates Hillary Rodham Clinton to be much more of a Communist extreme left person than even Obama is.

The Rabbit Hole Goes Real Deep, Find Out How Deep… HERE