Online:
Visits:
Stories:

By Wake Up World
Contributor profile | More stories

Story Views
Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

The 2015 UN Summit – Collectivism, Sustainability and the ‘New World Order’

Wednesday, August 19, 2015 14:44

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

20th August 2015

By Makia Freeman

Contributing Writer for Wake Up World

The 2015 UN Summit will be held in September 2015 in New York. Like any UN Summit, it will be full of UN buzzwords such as ‘consensus’, ‘empowerment’, ‘rule of law’ and ‘sustainability’, all of which have a sinister double meaning — as we will explore here.

The United Nations, founded by the Rockefellers and the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), has always been, right from its inception, about creating a One World Government. It has achieved this by appearing to be “of the people” when “of the globalists” would be a more apt description. Later this year, it will attempt to adopt the “post-2015 development agenda” which will be a furthering of its Agenda 21 aims, such as grabbing national land under the guise of saving the environment, forcing people off their land into tiny apartments in Smart Cities, global gun control and global internet control (the latest of its power grabbing schemes).

The Post-2015 Development Agenda

Here are some of the items on the agenda at the 2015 UN Summit:

– Protecting our planet and combating climate change

– Building effective, accountable and inclusive institutions to achieve sustainable development

– Delivering on a revitalized Global Partnership (which includes “meeting all commitments on the means of implementation”)

Sounds great and seems so noble if you don’t know the background to all this. However, when you pass the above points through the Orwellian translation unit, it means centralizing vast amounts of power into a body destined to become the World Government, under the pretext of fighting man-made global warming or climate change. It also means extending the reach of the United Nations so that local bodies such as local councils and municipalities that belong toICLEI, (the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, created in 1990 as a non-governmental spin-off of the United Nations) can implement its global directives and make it look ‘grassroots’, or like it was locally decided.

United Nations “Consensus” = Bought-and-Paid-For Opinion

The United Nations loves to boast about how it operates by consensus. However, it is fake consensus, much like the nations of the West have fake democracy. There is no real democracy when all of the political candidates have the same view on key issues, and answer to the same force. Likewise, there is no real consensus when the direction and agenda have been decided in advance. It’s just a playing out of a discussion, cleverly guided by key agents to ensure the outcome is what the elite have secretly dictated beforehand.

One way this happens at the UN is through the World Bank (a branch of the UN) which pays for people from all corners of the globe to come to events and give the appearance of a global consensus of all the citizens of the world. However, a condition of them being funded is that they say what they are told to say. Rose Koire and others have also exposed the Delphi Technique, which is a way that meetings are cleverly manipulated by facilitators to guide the group towards an end goal, view or consensus, while making it appear the group arrived there organically.

United Nations “Empowerment” = One World Military

When the UN talks about empowerment, it is not really talking about individual empowerment for you or I. That is just a pretext. The UN is seeking global power. It was set up to become higher and more powerful than national Governments. It is seeking the empowerment of itself. It wants an army or police force with which it can start to impose all its rules over every nation and person on Earth. There is already a UN “Peacekeeping” force – another Orwellian name for military soldiers. To the UN, war is peace.

In a similar vein, the UN “Humanitarian Missions” are not called wars but are wars. They involve the attacking and bombing of innocent countries (including many civilians, women and children, such as happened in Libya) because UN leaders and “the international community” (i.e. the elite-controlled global consensus) has decided that they want more control over a particular area. The more that the UN empowers itself, the closer we step to a One World Military force.

CONTINUE READING:

Previous articles by Makia Freeman: