Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Federal appeals court voids win over ‘good cause’ requirement for D.C. carry permits

Wednesday, December 16, 2015 7:26
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Federal appeals court undos win over ‘good cause’ requirement for D.C. carry permits

“We realize that we are undoing the work of litigation to date, but we have no choice,” wrote Chief Judge David B. Sentelle in vacating the ruling. (Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/The National Law Journal)

A unanimous three-judge panel found Tuesday that a District Court judge sitting in New York should not have been assigned the case in which he ruled against Washington’s concealed carry permitting scheme.

This came as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit lifted an injunction issued in May barring Washington D.C. from applying its vague “good cause” test as part of its controversial may-issue gun licensing program that has declined more permits than it has granted.

The reason for this is that the judge in that case, Wrenn v D.C., U.S. District Court Judge Frederick J. Scullin, had no jurisdiction to hear it.

“We realize that we are undoing the work of litigation to date, but we have no choice,” wrote Chief Judge David B. Sentelle, an appointment to the bench by President Ronald Reagan. “As the Supreme Court noted in Frad [Frad v. Kelly , 302 U.S. 312 (1937)], an order entered by a judge without jurisdiction is ‘null.’ ”

The other two panel judges, Cornelia T.L. Pillard and Laurence H. Silberman, appointments by Presidents Obama and George W. Bush respectively, backed Sentelle.

Scullin, of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York, was assigned by Chief Justice John Roberts in 2012 to rehear arguments in another challenge to D.C.’s ban on issuing concealed carry permits– the Palmer case– after the District Court Judge who originally heard the case, Judge Henry. H. Kennedy, retired without issuing a ruling.

Scullin found the city’s policy unconstitutional last July in a ruling that led to the licensing program subsequently challenged in Wrenn earlier this year.

Since Scullin was given the case by the calendar committee of the district court and not by Roberts, the appeals court this week said his decision on it was void.

The case will now be reassigned, likely to a federal judge from the D.C. District.

“This decision is good news for public safety in the District of Columbia,” D.C. Attorney General Racine said in a statement. “This ruling increases the likelihood that the case will be heard before a judge from our community – something that we have argued is crucial to understanding the public-safety issues at stake. We believe our concealed-carry law is reasonable and in line with similar laws in New Jersey, New York and Maryland – all of which have been upheld as constitutional by three federal appeals courts.”

The Second Amendment Foundation, who brought the Wrenn case, is vowing to continue the legal fight against the city’s draconian gun laws.

Until then, it would appear the good cause requirement is back in the nation’s capital.

The post Federal appeals court voids win over ‘good cause’ requirement for D.C. carry permits appeared first on Guns.com.



Source: http://www.guns.com/2015/12/16/federal-appeals-court-voids-win-over-good-cause-requirement-for-d-c-carry-permits/

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.