Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
Don't take my word for it. Take the word of Quebec coroner Dr. Bernard Lefrancois. Dr. Lefrancois was tasked with investigating a rash of suicides in a native community on Quebec's North Shore, and in his report, released yesterday, he doesn't hold back from using the “a” word.
Apartheid.
Ironically, on the very day that his report was released, 70 countries, including that most virtuous of The Nations of Virtue, Canada, were convening in Paris for yet another gabfest about Israeli apartheid and the implementation of the “two state solution.”
I don't hold out much hope that anything will come of Dr. Lefrancois' report. Reports and inquiries and hearings and investigations into our shamefully shabby treatment of First Nations have been a dismally predictable feature of the news cycle for as long as I can remember. They plop onto the news horizon with a ripple or occasionally a small splash, and are then quickly forgotten.
Nothing changes.
Maybe we'll start taking these matters seriously when 70 nations convene in Paris to discuss a blueprint for a Boycott, Divestment, and Sanction campaign against apartheid in Canada.
Proof that racial hatred can be spread to any where in the world as long as the Abrahamic religion is spread and set its root in there. The reason most of the protestant radio evangelicals went down the drain is because as soon as they ran out of the subjects to preach based on the New Testament, they move to the old one and that’s when they become demonic without realizing what went wrong with them.
The real essential teachings of Jesus is that you live your life for the truth even if there is a threat on your life until you die. Truth is forever and your life becomes a part of eternity. That’s the true meaning of getting eternal life through our actions. Paul’s interpretation of the event of the crucifixion has become the standard in Christianity but that was because Paul was originally a Pharisees who was entrenched in the Talmudic teachings of Abrahamic faith.
It was of course wrong.
And upon what source of information, exactly, do you base your entire second paragraph?
A source other than your opinion, I would hope?