Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
More than two decades since her allegations nearly destroyed the first President Clinton, Paula Jones is speaking out in an effort to prevent the second. One of several women to allege Bill Clinton sexually harassed her, Jones filed a lawsuit against him two years into his first presidential term, asserting that he asked her for sex years earlier in Arkansas.
Based on the intimate knowledge she claims to possess about the former first couple, Jones recently shared several reasons she thinks Hillary Clinton would make a terrible president.
“She should not be running with the terrible history they have,” she said in an interview with Daily Mail Online.
Naturally, Jones had a few thoughts about the man she claims propositioned her in a hotel room once again residing in the White House.
“Who would want Bill Clinton back a second time, doing the same stuff he was doing before, philandering with women?” she asked.
When it comes to Hillary, however, it is clear Jones has little confidence in her ability to lead.
“He is going to be telling her what to do,” Jones said of the Clintons’ relationship. “It’s a partnership. They have a political relationship, that is all it is.”
Jones also insisted that Hillary knew about her husband’s infidelity but remained with him – and lied to protect him – in an effort to advance her own political career.
“If she is for the everyday person,” Jones wondered, “why did she not stand up for the women when she knew what her husband did? There is no way that she did not know what was going on, that women were being abused and accosted by her husband. She knew what was happening and just to ignore it – it was a political relationship and suited them both.”
The couple has a “history of not being truthful,” Jones continued, adding that she believes Hillary Clinton is viewing her presidential bid as “an ego thing.”
Jones is the second Bill Clinton accuser to publicly criticize Hillary in recent months. As Western Journalism reported in April, Kathleen Willey insisted she would be an inept and untrustworthy president.
“I haven’t seen one single accomplishment that would give her the credentials to be president of the United States,” she said.
Do you think a second Clinton presidency would be bad for America? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.
This post originally appeared on Western Journalism – Equipping You With The Truth
I’m NOT American but I think that electing another Clinton would be a mistake. The next president should be as far removed from the OLD ONES as possible.
thats exactly why commie Hillary is running…because Bill can’t run again ! hence yes, he’d tell her what to do, that is what they plan on.