Online: | |
Visits: | |
Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
Good morning, it’s Paul here!
I wrote about loads more companies last night. So in case you haven’t seen it, yesterday’s full report is here, and includes sections on the following companies;
Fulham Shore (LON:FUL)- in line trading update
Keywords Studios (LON:KWS) – good results, but pricey
Utilitywise (LON:UTW) – all sorts of problems, looks messy, I don’t like this one at all
Next Fifteen Communications (LON:NFC) – good results, but relies on large adjustments. Weak balance sheet
Koovs (LON:KOOV) – a trading statement that tells us nothing about profitability, or financial position
Adept Telecom (LON:ADT) – good trading update
Universe (LON:UNG) – OK results for 2016
Flowtech Fluidpower (LON:FLO) – results amp; trading update sound pretty good
Topps Tiles (LON:TPT) – negative LFL sales, but profit still within range of market expectations
Nanoco (LON:NANO) – cash running out fast, and orders have (so far) failed to materialise
Thankfully it’s a bit quieter today, and I have to be quick, as am off to an investor lunch at the RAC Club.
So today I intend writing about;
Styles and Wood (LON:STY) trading update
HSS Hire (LON:HSS) final results
Learning Technologies (LON:LTG) 2016 results
Here goes.
Share price: 429p (down 8.3% today, at 10:10)
No. shares: 8.7m
Market cap: £37.3m
Trading update – this company describes itself as an;
“integrated property services and project delivery expert”
Profitability in 2016 seems to have been in line with expectations;
…anticipates delivering strong underlying profit and margin performance in 2016 with adjusted profit before tax in line with Board expectations.
As usual, we have to assume that the Board’s, and the market’s expectations are the same.
That sounds alright to me, so why is the share price down 8.3%? It seems to be due to these additional comments from the company today;
Following a review of full year performance ahead of the Group’s 2016 results, the Board expects Group reported revenues to be approximately 9% below that for FY 2015.
This arises due to the accounting treatment for the recognition of revenue related to frameworks and projects awarded to the Group in the second half of 2016 with carry through workload for 2017.
Whilst pre-commencement activities began during the period, significant proportions of the associated work streams were carried over into 2017 resulting in a corresponding impact on the revenue recognised in 2016.
Given that the company has achieved its overall profit objective for 2016, then I’m not sure why the market has reacted negatively to some revenues being deferred into 2017? Perhaps people were expecting out-performance on profit in 2016? Anyway, revenues being nudged from 2016 into 2017 should benefit performance in 2017.
My opinion – I’ve tightened up my stock selection criteria, and I no longer take any interest in low margin contracting, or consultancy type businesses. So this one’s not of any interest to me.
It had balance sheet issues in the past, which have improved, but there’s still no dividend currently. The forward PER for 2017 is just under 9, which might look cheap, but companies in this sector really don’t justify a rating any higher. Low margins, and big (often complex) contracts, means that there’s an ever-present risk of something going wrong. With no divis either, at the moment, I can’t see much attraction.
The shares have had a great run, almost 10-bagging, but that’s because at the starting point it was financially distressed. It isn’t any more, after a successful restructuring.
Note that the Stockopedia computers do like it a lot – a StockRank of 98. So maybe it might be worth a closer look?
Share price: 63.4p (down 5.8% today)
No. shares: 170.2m
Market cap: £107.9m
Final results – for the year ended 31 Dec 2016.
These figures don’t look much good to me. A few key numbers;
Cashflow – on a more positive note, both capex amp; finance costs reduced considerably, thus making the cashflow position improved vs 2015.
Balance sheet – just looks ridiculous. I have no idea how they managed to float this company with such a terrible balance sheet.
NTAV is actually negative – at -£25.4m. What does this mean in practice? Well, with no equity at all, basically the entire hire fleet is funded by bank debt, plus there’s a deficit on working capital. It’s extremely precarious in my view, and makes the equity very high risk.
My opinion – this company is ideally positioned to go bust in the next recession. It’s not making much money in the good times, and has a mountain of debt that could easily pull it under when business dries up in the next recession.
Therefore my only interest in this share would be to short it.
Learning Technologies (LON:LTG) - this is a stock we discussed last weekend at the UK Investor Show, as Nigel Wray has a big position in it.
The share price is up 4.8% today, to 46.1p, on positive-sounding 2016 results.
The figures are difficult to analyse, because the company is expanding, and making acquisitions. So I think the best thing would be to get hold of the latest broker research, and sense-check their forecasts.
A big recent acquisition of NetDimensions should considerably boost the 2017 (and beyond) figures.
It’s not cheap – the share seems to be rated on about 30 times 2017 forecasts. However, there is work in the pipeline (for the Civil Service) which sounds like it could be lucrative.
At a very first, quick glance, this share looks potentially interesting. I’ll try to spend more time researching it, maybe at the weekend, or whenever time permits.
Note that it’s not capitalising a lot in development spend, so the EBITDA looks pretty genuine.
Sorry, that’s all I have time for today. Graham might possibly add some more comments, below, if he spots anything interesting.
Regards, Paul.