(Before It's News)
Sir, Diane Coyle from the University of Manchester, with respect to a Universal Basic Income writes: “it is hard to see that a Universal Basic Income would do better at addressing the economic and social costs of large-scale redundancy than the previous policy of making payments to those who lost their jobs. “
Universal basic services are more important than income” April 5.
But suppose this prayer was read next Sunday in all our churches: “For all our young people who are never going to get a job, we pray they feel worthy citizens. Lord, hear our prayer”.
Would then Professor Coyle still believe that a payment under the dole system is a better option than a Universal Basic Income?
There’s a choice to be made. Either a system with flexible accessible humiliating dole payments handed out by besserwissing redistribution profiteers, or a UBI complemented by strict, very limited, supplementary payments to those of working age with special problems. I have no doubts which one I would choose.
PS. As always I signify that the needs of children and of those who have retired are to be met separately.
@PerKurowski
Source:
http://teawithft.blogspot.com/2017/04/the-biggest-problem-with-universal.html