Francis: “Inequality is the root of social evil.”
But what does the Catholic Church have to say?
The Communism of today, more emphatically than similar movements in the past, conceals in itself a false messianic idea. A pseudo-ideal of justice, of equality and fraternity in labor impregnates all its doctrine and activity with a deceptive mysticism, which communicates a zealous and contagious enthusiasm to the multitudes entrapped by delusive promises. This is especially true in an age like ours, when unusual misery has resulted from the unequal distribution of the goods of this world. This pseudo-ideal is even boastfully advanced as if it were responsible for a certain economic progress. In man’s relations with other individuals, besides, Communists hold the principle of absolute equality…
~Pope Pius XI, Divini Redemptoris
Verily, Our Lady of Fatima, was warning us of the changes which would be made at Vatican II which would ultimately end with the “formalized” Apostate Church, that is, a “church” free of Dogma. This will be secular humanism. The Catholic Church as philosophy rests upon Thomism and at Vatican II unfaithful men and certain wolves rerouted men’s hearts and intellects upon the “new or integral humanism” whose fruits are the heresies of: right to religious liberty, liberty of conscience, “legitimate” separation of church and state and ecumenism to name a few. Francis has recently spoken about the “legitimate” redistribution of wealth and where have we heard this term “legitimate” before with the modernist heretics of Rome? The “legitimate” separation of Church and State cannot be taken to mean that the Church must be silent on certain issues…Benedict XVI, Address to America, 19 January 2012 Brethren when you hear the word “legitimate” coming from the Conciliarists it is time for “earmuffs” over the ears!
.jpg)
Francis is a marxist. True Catholics do not follow these infiltrators.
The Church is against Communism, Socialism & Marxism. We have been infiltrated!
By demanding a more equitable distribution of this world’s goods (objectives entirely and undoubtedly legitimate), the Communist takes advantage of the present world-wide economic crisis to draw into the sphere of his influence even those sections of the populace which on principle reject all forms of materialism and terrorism. Pius XI, Divini Redemptoris
The definition of “Charity”, to a Socialist/Communist is, of course, much different than that of a Catholic. In fact, it is downright perverted. Nowadays, terms have different meanings used by these modernists who do not have the true Catholic thought process down. When did the Church become the “Robin Hood”of the world? For it is often, the best opportunity, to spread Selfless Love, in these “unequal” instances between social classes. For the poor you have always with you. Matthew 26:11 Pope St. Pius X warned they(Silionists) would establish this “Church of Darkness” or Harlot by using “human dignity” as their platform to deceive the masses. “What is to come of this collaboration? A mere verbal and chimerical construction in which we shall see, glowing in a jumble, and in seductive confusion, the words Liberty, Justice, Fraternity, Love, Equality, and human exultation, all resting upon an ill-understood human dignity.” Pope St. Pius X Vatican II implemented this new religion of man based upon this “updated” distorted view of human dignity which has thence resulted in an erroneous understanding of what true liberty is.
Communists hold the principle of absolute equality. ~Pius XI, Divini Redemptoris
In the beginning Communism showed itself for what it was in all its perversity; but very soon it realized that it was thus alienating the people. It has therefore changed its tactics, and strives to entice the multitudes by trickery of various forms, hiding its real designs behind ideas that in themselves are good and attractive. Thus, aware of the universal desire for peace, the leaders of Communism pretend to be the most zealous promoters and propagandists in the movement for world amity. Yet at the same time they stir up a class-warfare which causes rivers of blood to flow, and, realizing that their system offers no internal guarantee of peace, they have recourse to unlimited armaments.
~Pope Pius XI, Divini Redemptoris
.jpg)
.jpg)
The question now is not where we are at the current moment but where is this headed or going shortly?
Answer: Enter in the Maitreya. He is slated to “handle” all of the world’s problems as these varying chastisements start. He has a sidekick the “Master Jesus” (esoteric name) who is slated to takeover the seat of Peter. In piecing together the prophecies we can see this will happen around the time of the Italy Revolution, Occupy the Vatican Movement and when Benedict the XVI flees. The “formal”schism is close and men will be thrown into confusion! “Thy Church, O Lord, is torn apart by her own children. One camp is faithful to the fleeing Pontiff; the other is object to the new government of Rome which has broken the Tiara.” Premol 5th Century And what of Francis? It is said, according to the Maitreya(possible Antichrist), that the “head” of the Church would work in tandem and recognize the “Master Jesus”, who is in my opinion the False Prophet. If we thought Francis was bad enough just wait a little while longer! How do we tie in the Maitreya with Francis and this supposed “legitimate” redistribution of wealth? Let us have a look at some evidence:
*Maitreya & Francis both like to “share”(Socialism/Communism). The world is being setup for Maitreya
“…we will put into place the plans for redistribution of resources which already exist, waiting to be implemented. (Maitreya)
Source:
http://www.shareintl.org/archives/economics/faq_economic.htm
“…a more equal form of economic progress can be had through “the legitimate redistribution of economic benefits by the state, as well as indispensable cooperation between the private sector and civil society.” (Francis)
Source:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/09/pope-francis-redistribution-wealth-_n_5294629.html
.jpg)
These wolves speak of peace but do not have the proper notion of peace! Have we not been warned both from the Magesterium and the mystics? “Thus, aware of the universal desire for peace, the leaders of Communism pretend to be the most zealous promoters and propagandists in the movement for world amity. Yet at the same time they stir up a class-warfare which causes rivers of blood to flow, and, realizing that their system offers no internal guarantee of peace, they have recourse to unlimited armaments.” ~Pope Pius XI, Divini Redemptoris.
Our Lady to Bl. Aiello, March 23, 1961 “My daughter, the scourge is near. Much is spoken of peace, but all the world will soon be at war, and the streets will be stained with blood! No gleam of light is seen in the world, because men live in the darkness of error, and the enormous weight of sin angers the justice of God.”
Ruin will fall upon the world shortly after the pseudo peace treaty is made! Woe, woe & woe unto the world! “For when they shall say, peace and security; then shall sudden destruction come upon them.” 1 Thess 5:3
.jpg)
.jpg)
The “new” civilization of love the Vatican II Popes have been talking about is the same new world order the “world” speaks of. “But in their day, they will say, things are complex; the Church must be brought up to date (Vatican 2) and be made meaningful to today’s problems. When the Church and world art one know then that those days art at hand (beginning of thee End).” St. Anthony of the Desert 4th century Vatican II is modernism in action and all of the Conciliar Popes have been modernists. Objectively speaking these modernists are “antichrists” but more specifically they are agents of thee Antichrist. Their erroneous doctrines have been setting the world up for the Maitreya. Modernist, John Paul II, was no different and was a forerunner to Antichrist.
Maitreya speaking on these “forerunners before him:
Among humanity today is a growing number of men and women who are engaged in outlining the principles on which the new civilisation(same as Vatican II) will be built. They are to be found in almost every country, and they propagate the teachings which reflect the qualities of the New Age of Aquarius(Luciferian). They are to be found in every department of human living, and are to be recognised by their altruism and keen response to human need. These are the forerunners, sent ahead to prepare men for the experiences which will characterise the New Age. Some few of them work consciously, aware of their mission to aid a struggling world and of their connection with Hierarchy, but the majority work solely from the promptings of the heart and their desire to help. (Maitreya)
http://www.share-international.org/master/2012/ma_2012-07.htm
Is this not how Albert Pike said the world would eventually accept the Luciferian doctrine? That is, thru the pressure and distress of a war which will potentially kill billions; the world would ultimately submit and say “Peace!”. Yet where can true peace be found outside of the Walls of the Fortress of the TRUE (not the phoney “universal/masonic/communist church)Catholic Faith and Church?
.jpg)
In short, Vatican II, objectively speaking, is a heretical/schismatic progressivist Church which has “ends” in a formal uniting of all religions, that is, absolute equality of man and their religion of choice just as the Communists want. It is an “anything goes” “Church” because according to these heretics man has this false liberty to do so based upon the “ill understood” human dignity. Time is short brethren! Pray the Rosary, make reparations and do vast penances. Take Our Lady as thy guide as we enter this night for She is the full moon upon which we will live by, Ave Maria!
Related:
Here is more visual support for these communists in action:
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
More anti Catholic hogwash TCK? I see you have drug Mr. Rush Limbaugh into this one. Of course you forgot to mention his religious affiliation as being a Methodist. http://hollowverse.com/rush-limbaugh/ So folks should listen to protestants about the Catholic church now? Is that the message you are bringing? You appear to have an anti Catholic blasphemous agenda more and more with each new conspiracy story. Again folks be careful of his stories. Do some research on his blaspheming claims. Call him out on them. More and more it is appearing that he is NOT who he appears to be.
Kahuna,
Why would a traditionalist Catholic have any stomach for the stratagem of the modern Roman Catholic Church?
More importantly WALTER why would you care what any Catholic thinks since you aren’t one?
And this is about untrue conspiracy crap stories nothing more. If this crap wasn’t a conspiracy story there wouldn’t actually be anything to “stomach” now would there?
Chorizo….. Lord of the breakfast table
“Oh, I LOVE how the christ0ids are ready to go Medieval on one another, AGAIN!”
Yaaa didn’t take long for the kids in fedora hats now did it?
“…why would you care what any Catholic thinks since you aren’t one?”
I keep an eye on the SSPX and the Sedevacantists. There’s more going on there than just an amusing spectacle. That’s where, at the moment, the widest gate out of the Roman Rite, is to be found. And Rome knows it. You have your mentally sedentary traditionalists, on the one hand, caring little for what is and longing for what was (which Scripture says not to do); and on the other you have folks who like to look around and analyze what they see from the inside. Many Catholics ‘think’ their way into the open arms of the SSPX. A few Catholics even continue ‘thinking’ once they get there. Why is Rome still in stagnant ‘talks’ with the SSPX, which have gone nowhere, since the days of Lefebvre? And why the notorious Sedevacantist ‘monks’ with their keen eye to prophecy and conspiracy: they managed to learn the nature of the system, and that Rome is not their friend, but they haven’t learned that the Roman Rite is the problem, all the way back to its inception — as opposed to only post Vatican II Rome being the culprit? A highly unlikely scenario. Which leaves room for only one truth. Which makes the case a most interesting one to watch. And the SSPX ties into it all for many of the same reasons.
Add to that the fact that Rome plays heavily in prophecy. That is why I take an interest in what some Catholics think. I’m even interested in what you think, Kahuna.
Well first. I think these types of articles are dishonest garbage that shameful people put up supposedly in the name of the Lord and can always be traced to anti Catholic origins. Second I am positive that all of this kind of baloney is from reading the bible in the literalist sense. And not the literal sense as the church does. THAT is a very real problem with those that just choose to study the bible and those that are protestants. This leads to bunk like this article. Seems like most of those who know it all about the Catholic church are those that don’t belong to the Catholic church. I’m going with 1.2 billion. Not a few that claim to know it all. Or those typing in theyr underwear in fedora hats in mommas basement who decided yesterday there is no GOD. I’m going with 2000 years of Catholicism not the last 500 years of protestantism Or any bible study groups or anti pharisee nut jobs. Here I shall paste yet again what a literalist and literal are.
“Catholics interpret the Bible in a “literal” sense, while many fundamentalists, Evangelicals, and others interpret the Bible in a literalist sense.
The “literal” meaning of a passage of Scripture is the meaning that the author of that passage of Scripture intended to convey. The “literalist” interpretation of a passage of Scripture is: “that’s what it says, that’s what it means.”
Let me give you an example to illustrate the difference. If you were to read a passage in a book that said it was “raining cats and dogs outside”, how would you interpret that? As Americans, in the 21st Century, you would know that the author was intending to convey the idea that it was raining pretty doggone hard outside. That would be the “literal” interpretation…the interpretation the author intended to convey. On the other hand, what if you made a “literalist” interpretation of the phrase, “it’s raining cats and dogs”?
The “literalist” interpretation would be that, were you to walk outside, you would actually see cats and dogs falling from the sky like rain. No taking into account the popularly accepted meaning of this phrase. No taking into account the author’s intentions. The words say it was raining cats and dogs, so, by golly, it was raining cats and dogs! That is the literalist, or fundamentalist, way of interpretation.
If someone 2000 years in the future picked up that same book and read, “It was raining cats and dogs outside,” in order to properly understand that passage in the book, they would need a “literal” interpretation, not a “literalist” interpretation. Now, think about that in the context of interpreting the Bible 2000-3000 years after it was written”
There is no uh uh it’s not so. It is the truth and the way it actually is. This is what I BELIEVE to be true. I’m not interested in any literalist bible quotes to try to refute me.
No, WALTER has his eye on the roman catholic church so that he knows when they are coming down his road to gather up the protestant HEATHEN, (THAT BE YOU, BEEF CAKE) for staking and burning for THE christ0id CRIME displayed, heresy, in the NJ town square where you live (what a Public spectacle, beefy)!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oh, I LOVE how the christ0ids are ready to go Medieval on one another, AGAIN!
Kahuna wrote:
“Seems like most of those who know it all about the Catholic church are those that don’t belong to the Catholic church.”
You would admit, I am sure, that if the entity of the Roman Catholic Church is what I believe it is, then it certainly merits monitoring. Either she is who she says she is, or she is the most evil establishment known to modern man. There really aren’t any other options. And it was as a Catholic that I began my examination of Catholicism from the inside. I did what every good investigator should do: I tried to dismantle her from the inside out – figuratively speaking – in the course of my examination of both her and her history, knowing Truth withstands all things. But she did not withstand even the mild ‘rigors’ of an investigation that I, in my extremely limited capacity, could bring to bear against her. I found her to be untrue. Now I believe I see her clearly. And therefore, she warrants a wary eye.
“I’m going with 1.2 billion. Not a few that claim to know it all.”
Is it true in your experience, Kahuna, that such numbers of people agree on anything in this world, which happens to be legitimate and real? My experience teaches me that if 1.2 billion people are headed in the same direction, I should, as a matter of course, be headed in the opposite direction. Human kind is gullible in the extreme, and dangerously stupid when considered in great numbers. This stupidity is the result of lazy thinking. We’ve been given the tools to discern. But almost none of us use the tools.
“…not the last 500 years of Protestantism…”
Protestantism is just as problematic as Catholicism. I suggest that the truth lies not in anything Martin Luther or the ‘Reformers’ have to offer, but elsewhere entirely.
Are you used to a hail of Bible quotes coming from me when we converse, Kahuna? No. You are not. I generally treat you with more respect than that — simply throwing Scripture in your face. And I would agree with you that literal interpretation is the correct way to read the Word. What I disagree with is WHOM you are allowing to tell you what Scripture means. Each of us, as God intended, can sit with a Bible and glean meaningful substance from the words as they are written. We have no need of any man or institution, claiming for themselves the sole right of proper interpretation, to insinuate themselves between us and the Word. The Bible is very clear, the words of God are very clear, that He speaks to us plainly and directly. He says turn left, He means turn left. He says the Sabbath is on the Seventh Day, He does not mean it is on the first day. Rome feigns to seize authority which the word of God says plainly is not theirs to seize. Rome declares that theirs is the right to change what is written. But the words of God say plainly that no such right will at any time be granted to any man or institution of men. This is a problem for me. Why isn’t it for you? If the Vatican had the habit of doing everything God said to do, as God said to do it, you and I would be having a different conversation.
Well walter we shall once again agree to disagree. The beauty part about sites like this is that all are free to speak their mind. I am just calling out articles like this one with obvious agendas. I just don’t care for railing against the church. A lot of the time it seems like everyone expects everyone else to respect the beliefs they hold dear yet they don’t seem to have respect for others beliefs. (Not you and I we always have decent conversations.)Case in point I have been to protestant churches in the past and heard them rail against the Catholic church. One so bad I walked out. In my church the father said more than once that all religions are beutiful. I guess that’s the difference. I know you like to have these conversations as do I sometimes. And as always I respect your opinions and will keep you in my prayers my friend. I’m just set in my ways and will always believe what I have known to be true. As will you probably.