Profile image
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

TradCatKnight: One World Religion Watch: “A new universal religion where dogmatic faiths have no place” Maurizio d’Orlando

Tuesday, March 14, 2017 17:24
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

One World Religion Watch: “A new universal religion where dogmatic faiths have no place”

 One World Religion Watch: ”A new universal religion where dogmatic faiths have no place”
Maurizio d’Orlando
Pope Saint Pius X: “the great movement of apostasy being organized in every country for the establishment of a One-World Church which shall have neither dogmas, nor hierarchy, neither discipline for the mind, nor curb for the passions, and which, under the pretext of freedom and human dignity, would bring back to the world (if such a Church could overcome) the reign of legalized cunning and force, and the oppression of the weak, and of all those who toil and suffer.” [Notre Charge Apostolique, 15 August 1910]
Dear friends,
Father Kramer’s assertions are receiving further validation from many
Father Kramer has always maintained that the Pope Benedict’s renunciation
was invalid for defect of will. A renewed corroboration to that point comes
now, again from Antonio Socci (and others). 
Socci also reports that the Bergoglian camp is getting uneasy and therefore
unleashes the heavy calibers.
Socci informs that Andrea Tornielli, on the Vatican Insider, the most
authoritative mouthpiece of the Bergoglian camp and an almost unofficial
proxy for the Santa Marta viewpoint, has heavily intervened against Msgr.
Negri, a close friend of Pope Benedict and former bishop of Ferrara.
Msgr. Negri had expressed in an interview his concern that Pope Benedict
might have been forced to resign.  Msgr. Negri has sided with the conspiracy
theorists, wrote Tornielli. Socci observes that, with the tone and accents of
the officialdom, Tornielli issued then also a grave reproach to Msgr. Negri,
as if he himself, a layman, had a sort of a higher authority. Then Tornielli
goes on, Socci also observes, and extends the censorship to Pope Benedict
for using the papal name and title as “emeritus”, even the white robe, thus
funneling in many the impression that his resignation had not been a free
choice. Finally Socci reports on the interview given by Ettore Gotti Tedeschi,
who had been entrusted by Pope Benedict to lead the IOR, the Vatican bank.
Socci reports large sections of the interview. In the latter Gotti Tedeschi
relates in large frames how the conspiracy for the establishment of a religious
relativism useful to the scopes of a New World Order has developed and how
the Obama administration, the UN and world agencies have intervened to
such purpose on many issues such as for the abortion without constraints,
euthanasia and uncontrolled immigration. The idea behind all that, stated
Gotti Tedeschi in the excerpts related by Socci, is the establishment of a new
universal religion where dogmatic faiths have no place.
The Stranger | Posted March 13, 2017 
The yellow of the enigmatic “waiver” of Benedict XVI , over time, is magnified. This is confirmed by the outcry, the network, by the explosive interview the Archbishop of Ferrara, Monsignor Luigi Negri .
His words about the “enormous pressure” to which he was subjected as pope, until his “renunciation”, have aroused such an interest from overseas be largely repeated, commented and relaunched by the famous website “Breitbart” , close to Steve Bannon and the president Trump.
But what he said exactly the archbishop? On the eve of retirement, drawing a picture of the situation of the Church, Msgr. Negri, the online magazine “Rimini2.0″ , he recalled his relationship of “strong friendship” with Joseph Ratzinger and – after various considerations – declared textually on ” waiver “of Pope Benedict:
“It was an unprecedented gesture . In recent meetings I physically embrittled seen, but lucid in thought. I have little knowledge – thankfully – the facts of the Roman Curia, but I am sure that one day emerge grave responsibilities inside and outside the Vatican .Benedict XVI has undergone enormous pressure . It is no coincidence that in America, even on the basis of what has been published by Wikileaks, some Catholic groups have asked President Trump to open a commission of inquiry to investigate whether the administration of Barack Obama has lobbied Benedetto . It remains for now a serious mystery , but I am sure that responsibilities come out. “
Immediately came a reprimand signed by Andrea Tornielli , coordinator of “Vatican Insider” that Giuseppe Rusconi calls “one of the privileged sites from Santa Marta for the dissemination of sensitive information in a short time”.
Tornielli – with the stern tone that usually takes in ecclesiastical surveillance authority – has rebuked the archbishop for his statements and has approached the archbishop alleged “conspiracy theorists, who see in these pressures a conditioning that would make invalidate the waiver itself. It is what allows “many” to consider even Ratzinger as the ‘true Pope’, although these consequences the archbishop of Ferrara, in the interview cited above, does not come. “
Tornielli instead goes so far as to criticize Benedict XVI: “It remains an open question of what some personal choices, and never codified in writing, made by Benedict XVI – how to keep the white dress and the papal name, as well as the choice of the figure dell’emeritato – have inadvertently fueled the followers of the theory of the two Popes then degenerated into the defeatist theory Pope because blackmailed. “
The enigmatic choices of Benedict XVI – that in fact are completely new in the history of the Church – do not arouse the curiosity of a journalist investigating the reason, but cause only disappointment in him (probably well in bergogliana court).
Tornielli then writes that the “sci-fi thriller” pressuring “goes hand in hand with other statements in some ways even more serious, the theories about the ‘papacy shared’ and the ‘Petrine’ co-management. Theories that in recent years have counted some supporters “.
It refers – without naming him – to the secretary of Benedict XVI, Mgr. Georg Gaenswein and the prefect of the former Holy Office, the card. Muller who has resumed his thesis on “two legitimate living popes.”
If you enjoy the TradCatKnight blogs, please recommend above as a contributor!
Read more and watch related video at article link above.

Report abuse
The contributor has disabled comments for this story
Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.