| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Executive Order Allows Seizure Of Bank Accounts
Another Obama Executive Order Allows Seizure of Americans’ Bank Accounts
Titled an “Executive Order from the President regarding Authorizing the Implementation of Certain Sanctions…” the order says that if an individual is declared by the president, the secretary of state, or the secretary of the treasury to be a “sanctioned person,” he (or she) will be unable to obtain access to his accounts, will be unable to process any loans (or make them), or move them to any other financial institution inside or outside the United States. In other words, his financial resources will have successfully been completely frozen. The EO expands its authority by making him unable to use any third party such as “a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, subgroup or other organization” that might wish to help him or allow him to obtain access to his funds.
Continued below.
200,000 Year Old Annunaki Cities Discovered In Africa
Millions To Participate In FEMA Drill Next Week
The 3 Coming False Flag Attacks
Forget Gold: Here’s Where Die Hard Skeptics Are Storing Their Wealth
Something In The Air “Something’s Coming”, Quiet Urgency
Israel Tries To Aassassinate Top US General, Then Invites Him For Tea022e4
Celebrity Tila Tequila Exposes The Illuminati
Video Of The Underground Shelter Network for Long-Term Survival Of Future Catastrophes
Sitchin Ancient Alien Work Is Illuminati Psy-Op Tied To Rothschild
2012 – It’s Not Just The Mayans
Man Cooked To Death At Bumble Bee Tuna Factory
The Obama Tapes That Can Bring Romney Victory
Pole Shift Catastrophe’s Coming Soon
And if the individual so “sanctioned” decides that the ruling is unfair, he isn’t allowed to sue. In two words, the individual has successfully been robbed blind.
But it’s all very legal. The EO says the president has his “vested authority” to issue it, and then references endless previous EOs, including one dating back to 1995 which declared a “state of emergency” (which hasn’t been lifted): Executive Order 12957.
EO 12957 was issued by President Bill Clinton on March 15, 1995, which was also obliquely related to the Iran “problem”:
I, William J. Clinton, President of the United States of America, find that the actions and policies of the Government of Iran to constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.
Clinton’s EO further delegated such powers as were necessary to enforce the EO to the secretaries of the treasury and state “to employ all powers … as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States Government.”
Such EOs are the perfect embodiment of what the Founders feared the most: the combining of the legislative, executive, and judicial functions into one body. Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution says: “All legislative powers herein shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.” As Thomas Eddlem, writing for The New American, expressed it, “then it stands to reason [that] none is left for the president.”
But Joe Wolverton, also in The New American, pointed out the particular piece of language the Founders used to limit the powers of the president which totalitarians have twisted to allow such powers to expand: the “take care” clause, to wit: Article II, Section 3: he [the president] shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed…
The “take care” clause” also means it’s unconstitutional for obozo to refuse to enforce laws against illegals.
I do not see Romney saying anything about all these Executive Orders that I have seen on this site. If he wins do really you thing he will change any of them?
You want Romney to spend a week talking about all the Executive orders Obama’s put through? Ron Paul doesn’t even do that.
Will some please arrest the Commander in Chief? Or at least Leon Panetta???
Hmmm
Actually this article and the President are 100% wrong. There is NOTHING in the Constitution and therefore the law which allows the President or any member of the government to violate the Constitution. The only provision for a partial suspension of the Constitution is if and only if the Congress declares war. Congress has abosolutely NOT declared war. Therefore this and at least half of all the “signing” statements made to date by Presidents are NULL AND VIOD because they are in violation of the rule of law for violating the Constitution. People the government can only get away with these blatant acts of treason if the you the people allow them to………
im ready 4 i+ +o s+op by any means ness….le+s kick +heir hind ends back +o +he sewer where all +hese +urds belong!!
Yes, everything you say it true. Unfortunately, it didn’t help the 100,00+ Japanese Americans who were interred illegally during WWII, in fact the Supreme Court said it was OK to do this.
The Supreme Court also said slavery was ok too… That doesn’t make it right.
I think that it is past time to wake up, but it is never to late to revolt.
Exactly. “Law” only applies to the unwashed masses, and only when it’s convenient or opportune for the government to enforce. They do what they please, and if it’s “illegal”, they just write new “laws”.
Congratulations. This is actually “news”. It was probably an accident that you found it, and I don’t expect it to ever happen again…
If you want change, change yourself, the only way a moron mormon romney could ever be elected (selected) president of the United States of America would to be to have an opponent like the complete national security threat monster usurper illegal alien obama, to make Catholics slap God in the face to vote for a mormon cult freak should speak volumes. People do extremely stupid things like watching TV (mass propaganda induced hypnosis, a complete choreographed lie) http://www.infowars.com/the-idiot-box-how-tv-is-turning-us-all-into-zombies/ making idiots commanded to act like zombies. obama = romney dumbasses and voting for either evil is a wasted vote. I only hate one person on this planet at this moment and that’s romney because I personally think romney is a gutless draft dodging wimp and I would love to smash his new world order ndaa loving treasonous grill right down his globalist banker throat. Voters will be making a big TV news propaganda brainwashed mistake with the monsanto eugenics freak romney just like you were TV fooled with obama, knowing any damn thing about them is through TV propaganda lies and that’s a fact. American’s third choice is Governor Gary Johnson for president of the United States of America, do it. The 11 things I can’t stand about mittens romney. #1, bain capital frauds, (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/08/us/politics/ex-factory-worker-links-losses-to-bain.html)
#2, 8.5 billion dollar ponzi scheme http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021263378 and #3, complete financial restoration of monsanto eugenic frankin foods company with their GMO substances that are design to slow kill and sterilize us all, except them because they won’t be eating their own bug poison eugenics concoctions, they all have special protected gardens just for them, isn’t that nice. 10% of teenagers have liver damage as of now and that’s a fact that has never been heard of before in human history. #4, romney’s health care plan was the blueprint for obama’s death care plan. #5, mitt romney is a serious serial violent criminal http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jngor81CRE0 #6, major tax evasion fraud criminal won’t release his tax returns because they would implicate his gigantic thefts. I wonder how much of the 8.5 billion ponzi scheme romney has stashed, he could have paid off federal judges, I hear their expensive, 3 million cash can take care of business. #7, Major election fraud, Felony bribery, blatant vote buying with video recorded evidence, physical violence and blatant ballot theft, all very serious PROVABLE crimes against all American’s. #8, NDAA concentration camps lovers are in fact confessed Treasonous Traitors, period. mittens romney is a confessed NDAA lover and a provable Treasonous Traitor. #9, No constitutional rights or due process, romney’s job is to imprison 10,000,000 dissidents. #10 MITT ROMNEY IS A HABITAUL BLATANTLY OBVIOUS BOLD FACE LYING SOCIOPATHIC SCUM BAG http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zG7c7m37geI&feature=related And http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaXN3Iy-7AM&feature=related #11 the complete jackass mitt romney has no compassion for a terminally ill cancer patient, is a sure sign of being a blatant sociopath http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNv7lY-ZhKA and http://www.damninteresting.com/the-unburdened-mind/ check this out http://www.infowars.com/romney-will-fight-medical-marijuana-tooth-and-nail/ romney is a punk.
Sorry, James, Romney doesn’t come close to Obama as a liar. But the biggest difference is Romney is Constitutionally eligible for that office and Obama isn’t.
You actually don’t even know if Obama is an American citizen let alone a natural born citizen… which he can’t be with a Kenyan father. You also don’t know if his legal name is Barack Obama or Barry Soetoro. Why? Because he won’t tell you.
If you’re ready for his desire to rename the USA to Obamanation, hang in there; you’ll get it.
Why Martin Luther King Was Republican
It should come as no surprise that Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was a Republican. In that era, almost all black Americans were Republicans. Why? From its founding in 1854 as the anti-slavery party until today, the Republican Party has championed freedom and civil rights for blacks. And as one pundit so succinctly stated, the Democrat Party is as it always has been, the party of the four S’s: slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism.
It was the Democrats who fought to keep blacks in slavery and passed the discriminatory Black Codes and Jim Crow laws. The Democrats started the Ku Klux Klan to lynch and terrorize blacks. The Democrats fought to prevent the passage of every civil rights law beginning with the civil rights laws of the 1860s, and continuing with the civil rights laws of the 1950s and 1960s.
During the civil rights era of the 1960s, Dr. King was fighting the Democrats who stood in the school house doors, turned skin-burning fire hoses on blacks and let loose vicious dogs. It was Republican President Dwight Eisenhower who pushed to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1957 and sent troops to Arkansas to desegregate schools. President Eisenhower also appointed Chief Justice Earl Warren to the U.S. Supreme Court, which resulted in the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision ending school segregation. Much is made of Democrat President Harry Truman’s issuing an Executive Order in 1948 to desegregate the military. Not mentioned is the fact that it was Eisenhower who actually took action to effectively end segregation in the military.
Democrat President John F. Kennedy is lauded as a proponent of civil rights. However, Kennedy voted against the 1957 Civil Rights Act while he was a senator, as did Democrat Sen. Al Gore Sr. And after he became President, Kennedy was opposed to the 1963 March on Washington by Dr. King that was organized by A. Phillip Randolph, who was a black Republican. President Kennedy, through his brother Atty. Gen. Robert Kennedy, had Dr. King wiretapped and investigated by the FBI on suspicion of being a Communist in order to undermine Dr. King.
In March of 1968, while referring to Dr. King’s leaving Memphis, Tenn., after riots broke out where a teenager was killed, Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd (W.Va.), a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, called Dr. King a “trouble-maker” who starts trouble, but runs like a coward after trouble is ignited. A few weeks later, Dr. King returned to Memphis and was assassinated on April 4, 1968.
Given the circumstances of that era, it is understandable why Dr. King was a Republican. It was the Republicans who fought to free blacks from slavery and amended the Constitution to grant blacks freedom (13th Amendment), citizenship (14th Amendment) and the right to vote (15th Amendment). Republicans passed the civil rights laws of the 1860s, including the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the Reconstruction Act of 1867 that was designed to establish a new government system in the Democrat-controlled South, one that was fair to blacks. Republicans also started the NAACP and affirmative action with Republican President Richard Nixon’s 1969 Philadelphia Plan (crafted by black Republican Art Fletcher) that set the nation’s fist goals and timetables. Although affirmative action now has been turned by the Democrats into an unfair quota system, affirmative action was begun by Nixon to counter the harm caused to blacks when Democrat President Woodrow Wilson in 1912 kicked all of the blacks out of federal government jobs.
Few black Americans know that it was Republicans who founded the Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Unknown also is the fact that Republican Sen. Everett Dirksen from Illinois was key to the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964 and 1965. Not mentioned in recent media stories about extension of the 1965 Voting Rights Act is the fact that Dirksen wrote the language for the bill. Dirksen also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing. President Lyndon Johnson could not have achieved passage of civil rights legislation without the support of Republicans.
Critics of Republican Sen. Barry Goldwater, who ran for President against Johnson in 1964, ignore the fact that Goldwater wanted to force the Democrats in the South to stop passing discriminatory laws and thus end the need to continuously enact federal civil rights legislation.
Those who wrongly criticize Goldwater also ignore the fact that Johnson, in his 4,500 State of the Union Address delivered on Jan. 4, 1965, mentioned scores of topics for federal action, but only 35 words were devoted to civil rights. He did not mention one word about voting rights. Then in 1967, showing his anger with Dr. King’s protest against the Vietnam War, Johnson referred to Dr. King as “that Nigger preacher.”
Contrary to the false assertions by Democrats, the racist “Dixiecrats” did not all migrate to the Republican Party. “Dixiecrats” declared that they would rather vote for a “yellow dog” than vote for a Republican because the Republican Party was know as the party for blacks. Today, some of those “Dixiecrats” continue their political careers as Democrats, including Robert Byrd, who is well known for having been a “Keagle” in the Ku Klux Klan.
Another former “Dixiecrat” is former Democrat Sen. Ernest Hollings, who put up the Confederate flag over the state Capitol when he was the governor of South Carolina. There was no public outcry when Democrat Sen. Christopher Dodd praised Byrd as someone who would have been “a great senator for any moment,” including the Civil War. Yet Democrats denounced then-Senate GOP leader Trent Lott for his remarks about Sen. Strom Thurmond (R.-S.C.). Thurmond was never in the Ku Klux Klan and defended blacks against lynching and the discriminatory poll taxes imposed on blacks by Democrats. If Byrd and Thurmond were alive during the Civil War, and Byrd had his way, Thurmond would have been lynched.
The 30-year odyssey of the South switching to the Republican Party began in the 1970s with President Richard Nixon’s “Southern Strategy,” which was an effort on the part of Nixon to get Christians in the South to stop voting for Democrats who did not share their values and were still discriminating against their fellow Christians who happened to be black. Georgia did not switch until 2002, and some Southern states, including Louisiana, are still controlled by Democrats.
Today, Democrats, in pursuit of their socialist agenda, are fighting to keep blacks poor, angry and voting for Democrats. Examples of how egregiously Democrats act to keep blacks in poverty are numerous.
After wrongly convincing black Americans that a minimum wage increase was a good thing, the Democrats on August 3 kept their promise and killed the minimum wage bill passed by House Republicans on July 29. The blockage of the minimum wage bill was the second time in as many years that Democrats stuck a legislative finger in the eye of black Americans. Senate Democrats on April 1, 2004, blocked passage of a bill to renew the 1996 welfare reform law that was pushed by Republicans and vetoed twice by President Clinton before he finally signed it. Since the welfare reform law expired in September 2002, Congress had passed six extensions, and the latest expired on June 30, 2004. Opposed by the Democrats are school choice opportunity scholarships that would help black children get out of failing schools and Social Security reform, even though blacks on average lose $10,000 in the current system because of a shorter life expectancy than whites (72.2 years for blacks vs. 77.5 years for whites).
Democrats have been running our inner-cities for the past 30 to 40 years, and blacks are still complaining about the same problems. More than $7 trillion dollars have been spent on poverty programs since Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty with little, if any, impact on poverty. Diabolically, every election cycle, Democrats blame Republicans for the deplorable conditions in the inner-cities, then incite blacks to cast a protest vote against Republicans.
In order to break the Democrats’ stranglehold on the black vote and free black Americans from the Democrat Party’s economic plantation, we must shed the light of truth on the Democrats. We must demonstrate that the Democrat Party policies of socialism and dependency on government handouts offer the pathway to poverty, while Republican Party principles of hard work, personal responsibility, getting a good education and ownership of homes and small businesses offer the pathway to prosperity.
PLEASE SEND THIS TO EVERYONE. LET THE TRUTH BE TOLD!!!
The only bank accounts worth taking are those of the obscenely rich.
So you condone thievery, as long as it isn’t against YOU……..?
The money-ruled American political system has a pretty straight-ahead Wall Street agenda and is designed to eliminate opposition the way dictatorships do…Mitt Romney is a wolf in a wolf’s clothing, Barack Obama is a wolf in a sheep’s clothing, but they both essentially have the same agenda…serve their Masters…TPTB…They have a propaganda campaign going on ( via MSM ) and intensive public relations and psychological warfare that is intended to convince people that they don’t have any options…The Question is ?…Do we the people of U.S of A… have any Options???
thanks to Mr. Obama, if they seize my bank account they’re not going to get much.
don’t worry folks. the election is about to get completely deconstructed: http://octsurprise.com