| Visitors Now: | |
| Total Visits: | |
| Total Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Reckless Disregard & Traitorous Orders by Obama
Karl Denninger / Market Ticker
Fox News has learned from sources who were on the ground in Benghazi that an urgent request from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on the U.S. consulate and subsequent attack several hours later on the annex itself was denied by the CIA chain of command — who also told the CIA operators twice to “stand down” rather than help the ambassador’s team when shots were heard at approximately 9:40 p.m. in Benghazi on Sept. 11.
Stand down?
You can’t be serious.
As I noted a few days ago it appears that our “purpose” in maintaining that “safe house” in Libya was that we had thousands of MANPADs — man-totable anti-aircraft missiles — “loose” over there, and were trying to find them and basically buy them back (read: bribery.) Therefore, we knew damn well that the so-called “annex” in question was a high-value target to anyone who had a stick in their azz about America, as it contained both weapons and lots of money — two commodities in high demand in that part of the world.
At least three men, including two now-dead ones, ignored the order to stand down and attempted to defend the consulate. They died defending American soil despite orders to not do so. Worse, during the attempted defense they managed to get a laser designator on the people firing on the annex and yet they couldn’t get anyone to put ordnance on that location.
So exactly who refused help?
It is looking increasingly likely that the person responsible for this is President Obama himself, personally.
Breaking news on Benghazi: the CIA spokesman, presumably at the direction of CIA director David Petraeus, has put out this statement: “No one at any level in the CIA told anybody not to help those in need; claims to the contrary are simply inaccurate. ”
But clearly, someone did issue a “Stand Down” order (that was ignored.) Who was it?
There’s only one person left: President Obama himself.
Facts are funny thing — they eventually lead to inescapable conclusions, no matter how hard you’d wish they didn’t, as potential explanations for various events are examined and discarded.
It now appears that we have a President who not only intentionally put our men and women in harm’s way without appropriate defensive measures but when they came under attack he literally ordered them to die rather than defend them.
Are we as American going to sit for this outrage or will we call it what it is?
What did the President know and when did he know it?
Who does Petraeus take his orders from? Only one person.The marxist.Why would a general and an admiral get booted if this was not the case? This is treason of the highest order,and something needs to be done now not later.Don’t expect the election to solve all of the problems its still a two headed snake.I think they know now how far they can go and nothing that they do can be stopped.I’m for seceding from the union if that’s what it takes to stop this over reaching of the federal gov.A civil war would be the last thing anybody would want but not off the table.Our 2nd amendment was put there for this very reason and even this has been usurped by the UN treaty.If the states hold their ground against this invasion then we as a people need to stand behind them with all that we have.Only then will the federal gov. stand down.Our military is our sons and daughters,they will stand with us.It is time for the generals to take an relieve this marxist from the highest position and we the people will stand with you.We stand as one.