Visitors Now:
Total Visits:
Total Stories:
Profile image
By John Rolls (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

Judge Jeanine Attacks BO Comments at National Prayer Breakfast -Opening Statement Video

Sunday, February 8, 2015 11:38
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
Get FREE private and secure Email and Messaging click now!

(Before It's News)

Published on Feb 7, 2015

February 7, 2015 – ( Fox News – Justice w/ Judge Jeanine Pirro – Opening Statement ) – Judge Jeanine Pirro Takes on Obama’s Comments at National Prayer Breakfast

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 1 comment
  • Ask the fake judge to answer this? There are no judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Sat. 138-178)

    “The law subscribes to the king (in America, the people) the attribute of sovereignty; he is sovereign and independent within his own Dominion; and owes no kind of subjection to any other potentate upon earth. Hence, it is, that no suit or action can be brought against the king, even in civil matters, because no court can have jurisdiction over him; for all jurisdiction implies supremacy of power”.(Chisholm vs. Georgia, 2 Dall. 419,458.)

    “The people, or the Sovereign are not bound by general words in statutes, restrictive of prerogative rights, titles or interests, unless expressly named. Acts of limitation do not bind at the King, nor the people. The people have been ceded all the rights of the king, the former Sovereign. It is a maxim of the common-law that when an act of parliament is made for the public good, the advancement of religion and Justice, and to prevent injury and wrong, the king shall be bound by such an act, though not named; but when a statute is General, and any prerogative rights, titles or interests would be divested or taken from the king (or the people) in such case he shall not be bound”. The People vs. Herkimer, 15 American Decisions 379, 4 Cowen (NY 345, 348 (1825)).

    Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 “No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore.”

    Stock v. Medical Examiners 94 Ca 2d 751. 211
    P2d 289 In Interest of M.V., 288 Ill.App.3d 300, 681 N.E.2d 532 (1st
    Dist. 1997) “Where a court’s
    power to act is controlled by statute, the court is governed by the
    rules of limited jurisdiction, and courts exercising
    jurisdiction over such matters must proceed within the structures of
    the statute.” “The state citizen is immune from any and all
    government attacks and procedure, absent contract.” see, Dred
    Scott vs. Sanford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393
    or as the Supreme Court has stated clearly, “…every man is
    independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not
    bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his
    consent.”

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story
Share This Story:
Print this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.