| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Judge Jeanine Attacks BO Comments at National Prayer Breakfast -Opening Statement Video
Sunday, February 8, 2015 11:38
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
Published on Feb 7, 2015
February 7, 2015 – ( Fox News – Justice w/ Judge Jeanine Pirro – Opening Statement ) – Judge Jeanine Pirro Takes on Obama’s Comments at National Prayer Breakfast
Share This Story:
Ask the fake judge to answer this? There are no judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Sat. 138-178)
“The law subscribes to the king (in America, the people) the attribute of sovereignty; he is sovereign and independent within his own Dominion; and owes no kind of subjection to any other potentate upon earth. Hence, it is, that no suit or action can be brought against the king, even in civil matters, because no court can have jurisdiction over him; for all jurisdiction implies supremacy of power”.(Chisholm vs. Georgia, 2 Dall. 419,458.)
“The people, or the Sovereign are not bound by general words in statutes, restrictive of prerogative rights, titles or interests, unless expressly named. Acts of limitation do not bind at the King, nor the people. The people have been ceded all the rights of the king, the former Sovereign. It is a maxim of the common-law that when an act of parliament is made for the public good, the advancement of religion and Justice, and to prevent injury and wrong, the king shall be bound by such an act, though not named; but when a statute is General, and any prerogative rights, titles or interests would be divested or taken from the king (or the people) in such case he shall not be bound”. The People vs. Herkimer, 15 American Decisions 379, 4 Cowen (NY 345, 348 (1825)).
Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 “No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore.”
Stock v. Medical Examiners 94 Ca 2d 751. 211
P2d 289 In Interest of M.V., 288 Ill.App.3d 300, 681 N.E.2d 532 (1st
Dist. 1997) “Where a court’s
power to act is controlled by statute, the court is governed by the
rules of limited jurisdiction, and courts exercising
jurisdiction over such matters must proceed within the structures of
the statute.” “The state citizen is immune from any and all
government attacks and procedure, absent contract.” see, Dred
Scott vs. Sanford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393
or as the Supreme Court has stated clearly, “…every man is
independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not
bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his
consent.”