Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
WASHINGTON – U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, speaks with the conviction and enthusiasm of a man who believes he has found a solution to one of Washington’s thorniest current problems: whether to give President Obama authority to cut a far-ranging trade deal with little congressional control.
And that relatively simple solution is in a time-tested American tradition: If something goes wrong, put it to a vote.
He explained to WND why he believes the solution to the deal’s many questions lies in an amendment being drafted by Reps. Rick Mulvaney, R-S.C., and Mark Meadows, R-N.C.
The amendment would let the entire House, not just the 37 members of the House Ways and Means committee, vote on any changes to the bill that would give the president the fast-track authority to make the trade deal.
Jordan portrayed the amendment as a restoring of the constitutional checks and balances to the trade agreement process, telling WND, “If it (a proposed change) comes to a vote on the full floor, is it really that big of a deal? If something really egregious arises, this gives us a chance to turn it off.”
The Trans-Pacific Partnership, or TPP, a monumental trade deal between the U.S. and Pacific Rim nations, appears to have something to dislike for everyone across the political spectrum.
Jordan has his own problems with the bill, one being what he calls “a several billion dollar social-welfare giveaway program” that would give money to workers who lose their jobs, ostensibly because of free trade.
“If you believe in trade, then you don’t need a social welfare system saying that the jobs are going to be lost. We believe trade creates jobs. If you believe that, why do you have a social welfare giveaway as part of the deal?”
Read more at WND:
http://www.wnd.com/2015/06/simple-solution-to-obamatrades-problems/