Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Voice of Reason
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

BILDERBERG 2015 AUSTRIA – WHAT’S IN STORE THIS YEAR?

Monday, April 13, 2015 14:32
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

THIS POST BEGINS WITH DISCUSSION ABOUT BILDERBERG…

Bilderberg

WHO ARE THEY, WHAT ARE THEY DOING?

THEN THE POST TRANSITIONS INTO AN ARTICLE WRITTEN BY DAVE HODGES OF THE COMMON SENSE SHOW DISCUSSING WHY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL NEVER STAND UP TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER, DESPITE ALL THE MACHO BRAVADO TALK EVERYONE SEEMS SO GOOD AT!

SO WHO IS THE “BILDERBERG GROUP”

LIKEWISE, WHO IS THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION?
 

IN SHORT:

THE ONES WITH THEIR HANDS UP OBAMA’S *** MAKING HIM SPEAK!

Puppet

The following comes from my post titled: IS THE WORLD’S SHADOW GOVERNMENT THE BILDERBERG GROUP? For the purpose of being a little more specific, we can probably just refer to them as either 1) “The Powers That Be,” or 2) “The Puppet-masters.” They are the most powerful men and women in the world, and they not only buy and sell our governments at will, but they also buy and sell us by proxy as the constituents of those governments. We’re talking about families worth $350 BILLION to $500 BILLION EACH! The following comes from a recent post titled: AMERICA IS BEING PLAYED BY THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS AND THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION. 

SIDE NOTE: ANYONE KNOW WHERE MR. ZUCKERBERG FITS INTO ALL THIS? I WON’T TELL YOU WHERE, BUT I WILL TELL YOU IF YOU READ BOTH OF THESE EVERYTHING WILL LOOK A LITTLE DIFFERENT, AND YOU’LL UNDERSTAND HOW FACEBOOK GOT WHERE IT DID:

The things I could tell you about the Trilateral Commission (TC) would fill a book. Actually, many books have already been written on the group, started by David Rockefeller and his millions. Rockefeller is also heavily involved in the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), another “think-tank” group of elites who come up with policy for countries round the world, including the United States. The true colors of Trilateral Commission are seen when we see what presidents have done to incorporate their policy into their own.

What people seem to not be getting is that both of these groups have been deeply involved in policy created FOR America. Imagine that, a group of elite (very powerful, very wealthy, very politically minded individuals) come together to decide what the policies will be for America with respect to how things are done within America’s borders and how they are done with respect to foreign issues.

This may seem difficult to believe for the average person, but I think it is mostly due to a lack of education surrounding the situation. Too many people get their news from the mainstream bureaus and this kind of thing is not even really mentioned, even by the more seemingly conservative branches of media.

The real news or information comes from independent sources either on the ‘Net or in the books that have been written about these groups. Sometimes, the elites themselves will write books explaining what they’re doing. Henry, Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and David Rockefeller (among others), have all written books that explain – in one way or another – why the “nation-state” (like America) is going the way of the dinosaur, in favor of a globalized economic structure. Simply reading Rockefeller’s “Memoirs” provides great insight about what he has been attempting to accomplish in the United States for generations. Obviously, things began with his ancestor John D. Rockefeller, who made the family’s original fortune from oil in America, through his company Standard Oil.

As that money and power went from one generation to the next of Rockefellers in America, things were done first to protect their financial kingdom. When they were forced by the courts to sell of what was then considered to be a monopoly, the Rockefellers became extremely wealthy by liquidating assets into cash money. The Rockefellers still own stock in Standard Oil as well as other companies and the net worth of the Rockefeller family today is somewhere in the neighborhood of $340 billion dollars.

Bilderberg

JIM TUCKER IS THE ONLY REPORTER EVER TO GET INTO BILDERBEREG… EVER!

An excerpt from Jim Tucker’s Bilderberg Diary

The Bilderberg group is an organization of political leaders and international financiers that meets secretly every spring to make global policy. There are about 110 regulars—Rockefellers, Rothschilds, bankers, heads of international corporations and high government officials from Europe and North America. Each year, a few new people are invited and, if found useful, they return to future meetings. If not, they are discarded. Decisions reached at these secret meetings affect every American and much of the world.

This book examines the history and actions of the secret group that calls itself Bilderberg and the efforts of one courageous reporter—James P. Tucker Jr., who has been trailing Bilderberg for nearly 40 years—to focus the spotlight on the actions of what many have called “the world’s shadow government.”

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

BILDERBERG: ITS LONG AND SECRET HISTORY 

The roots of Bilderberg go back centuries, when international moneychangers would secretly manipulate the economy to enrich themselves and enslave ordinary people. The ROTHSCHILDS of Britain and Europe have met secretly with other financiers for centuries, as did the ROCKERFELLERS of America. In the beginning, the Rothschilds were “Red Shields” because of the ornament on their door and the Rockefellers of Germany were “Rye Fields” because of their crops.

One of the most significant such meetings took place in the spring of 1908, led by Sen. Nelson Aldrich of Rhode Island, whose family married into the Rockefeller clan, accounting for the late Gov. Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller’s given name. It was held on Jekyll Island off the Georgia coast. The late B.C. Forbes, editor of Forbes magazine, reported what transpired at this meeting of the world’s wealthy. With Aldrich were Henry Davidson, of J.P. Morgan and Co.; Frank Vanderlip, president of the National City Bank; Paul Warburg, of Kuhn Loeb and Co., and A. Piatt Andrew, assistant secretary of the treasury. They emerged from this secret meeting with a plan for “a scientific currency system for the United States.” They had the power to pressure Congress into establishing the Federal Reserve Board, a private group of bankers who meet to shape the money supply.

But in 1954, the international financiers decided that the world had become so small, and their interests intersected so often, that they must have regular, annual meetings. That year, they met at the Bilderberg Hotel in Holland, and took the name “Bilderberg” for themselves. They have met behind sealed-off walls and armed guards at plush resorts ever since. Secrecy prevailed briefly, until the late journalist, Westbrook Pegler, exposed Bilderberg in 1957. However, Chatham House rules have remained in effect, whereby meetings are held privately and attendees are prohibited from talking on the record about what transpired.

Pegler devoted two of his nationally syndicated columns to Bilderberg in April 1957, although he did not know the group’s name.

Pegler wrote:

“Something very mysterious is going on when a strange assortment of 67 self-qualified, polyglot designers and arbiters of the economic and political fate of our western world go into a secret huddle on an island off Brunswick, Ga., and not a word gets into the popular press beyond a little, routine AP story.”

Pegler reported that Ralph McGill, the late editor of The Atlanta Constitution and Arthur Hayes Sulzberger, publisher of The New York Times, had attended on their promise of secrecy. Since, the publisher and associate editor of The Washington Post, Donald Graham and Jimmy Lee Hoagland, respectively, have been regular participants. All network news channels have attended these meetings. All promise to abide by the rule of secrecy.

Bilderberg, which typically meets at a luxury resort near a small town, provides a short “press release” to the local paper—preferably a weekly. It is designed to reassure natives as armed guards arrive, motorcades roar by, yachts dock and helicopters land, delivering unidentified people behind closed-off walls. The “press release” is the same each year; only the site and dates are updated. It says individuals will meet privately to do nothing for three days. Otherwise, they try to impose a complete blackout.

The blackout is virtually complete in the United States. When giant newspapers and broadcast outlets say they do not want the word “Bilderberg” to appear, the pressure on Associated Press is obvious; they are the biggest customers, paying far more than a small-circulation local paper. Small-city papers depend on AP for all out-of-town news, even for their state legislative coverage. They run hard to stay ahead of the city council and high school football team. Unless informed directly, they have no knowledge that Bilderberg exists.

While Bilderberg denies its meetings are significant, the record proves otherwise. The now-defunct Spotlight wrote advance stories on the end of the Cold War, the downfall of Margaret Thatcher as prime minister of Britain and of President George Bush the Elder’s breaking of his pledge to not raise taxes based on what transpired among Bilderbergers. More recently, while the mainstream media in 2002 was asserting that the invasion of Iraq would come by late summer or early fall, AMERICAN FREE PRESS reported that there would be no aggression until 2003. The war began in March 2003. Learning what transpires at Bilderberg can provide a glimpse of what the future holds.

 

BILDERBERG: CONSPIRACY ‘THEORY’ OR FACT? 

When international financiers, heads of state and high government officials are exposed conducting public business in secret, they whimper about “conspiracy theories.” But I will soon provide you with names and telephone numbers you can check yourself. Challenge these Bilderberg conspirators to deny that:

They meet at a secret location each spring, normally in late May or early June. Their exclusive resort will be sealed off at high noon on the Wednesday before Bilderberg starts meeting on Thursday through Sunday. The resort will be emptied of all non-Bilderberg people. Armed guards will seal off the resort to prevent anyone from approaching.

All Bilderberg participants and their staff people, as well as all of the resort personnel, are sworn to secrecy. They will report nothing. Collaborating newspapers, including The Washington PostThe New York Times and Los Angeles Times, will report nothing. They keep their vows of silence so fervently they allow their own newspapers to be factually wrong rather than risk exposing Bilderberg. Participants will deny that Bilderberg even exists. You will almost never read the word “Bilderberg” in these newspapers or hear it on national network news, which have all participated in vows of secrecy. (Because of extensive coverage in Europe in recent years, The New York Times published a “humor” commentary after the 2004 meeting in Stresa, Italy, denouncing “conspiracy” theories.)

Chasing Bilderberg for 37 years has been the most exciting assignment of my lifetime newspaper career, the first 20 years of which were in the mainstream press. I had held some high positions—night editor of the now-defunct Washington Daily News, editor of the Martinsville, Va. Bulletin, copy editor at the Richmond, Va. Times-Dispatch and, finally, assistant news editor of the Akron, Ohio Beacon-Journal.

So a moment that came in the spring of 1975 is forever photographed in my mind. I was being interviewed by Willis Carto for the job of starting a newspaper to be called The Spotlight. Carto was officially “treasurer” of Liberty Lobby but he was more than that. He was Liberty Lobby, having founded the populist institution in 1955.

He asked me what I thought of Bilderberg. I had never heard of Bilderberg. He gave me a brief oral summary and a lot of Liberty Lobby’s research material to examine. The materials contained not only the institution’s newsletters—Liberty Letter monthly and Liberty Lowdown —but also copies of the columns of the late, great newspaperman, Westbrook Pegler, who had first observed these mysterious meetings from afar and written about them in the 1950s.

I was dumbfounded. How could I have spent my adult life with Associated Press, United Press International and other newswires ticking at my ear, and serve on newspapers with far-flung staffs across the globe and not know of these characters? The Daily News had been a Scripps-Howard newspaper; its headquarters on the same 3rd floor as the News’s staff. Scripps-Howard covered the world. I edited its copy for the News and had much communication with the Washington staff of Scripps-Howard.

And that was the year—1975—that started my career as the only reporter who, for nearly four decades now, has worked earnestly to hound this secret meeting of the world’s most powerful businessmen, powerbrokers and politicians and expose it to the light of public scrutiny.

I soon learned that Bilderberg had recruited the media moguls into its secret conspiracy and dictated an absolute blackout in the United States. There was much Spotlight-generated and now AMERICAN FREE PRESS-generated Bilderberg publicity in Europe, but the near total blackout in the United States persists.

Bilderberg is a powerful assembly of the world’s leading financiers, industrialists and political operatives. It includes such internationalists as banker David Rockefeller, heads of state in Europe and high officials of the U.S. government—White House, Defense, State, Congress and others. Past U.S. presidents—Bill Clinton and Gerald Ford—have attended Bilderberg. But a sitting president cannot because White House paperboys are given his complete schedule each day—the size of a paperback novel, accounting for every minute. Even his schedule on “working vacations”—the only kind a president takes—is provided. There is no way a president can disappear for three days without accounting for himself and if a sitting president attended Bilderberg, even the controlled media would be hard-pressed to explain away the president’s absence from the limelight, hidden behind the locked gates of the Bilderberg meeting.

High officials of The Washington PostThe New York Times, and Los Angeles Times and of all three major networks have attended Bilderberg many times, on the promise of secrecy, to report nothing and to not use the word “Bilderberg.” Except for some minor, inconsequential accidents in which the word “Bilderberg” has suddenly appeared in print—after all, you can’t call a staff meeting and tell all 900 New York Times news staffers about the blackout—the promise has been kept.

The only time “Bilderberg” ever appeared in The New York Times came when one of the luminaries died at a meeting and the obituary writer and his editors innocently let the word slip through. And, as mentioned earlier, The New York Times responded to a blizzard of publicity and criticism in Europe with a “humor” story in 2004 reassuring the world there is no “conspiracy.”

Four times the word slipped into The Washington Post—which has been represented by successive publishers since Bilderberg’s first meeting under that name in 1954. One came in a worshipful profile of Bilderberg luminary Vernon Jordan. In another instance, in a multi-part profile of then-Vice President Dan Quayle, the fact that Quayle had attended a Bilderberg meeting was mentioned in passing, buried deep in one of the articles in the series. Another came in an inside-page story celebrating how Austria was being economically penalized for holding a fair election in which Joerg Haider’s Nationalist Party enjoyed significant gains. In a laundry list of important meetings that had been scheduled for Austria, but changed, the Postmentioned Bilderberg—but said it had been moved to France when it actually would take place in Belgium, outside Brussels. Then, in a Dec. 3, 2004, obituary for Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, the Post said: “He is also credited with establishing the Bilderberg Group—a secretive annual discussion forum for prominent politicians, thinkers and businessmen, which he chaired from 1954 to 1976.” The Post made no mention of its own long-standing involvement in the secretive international body. And in 2005, Va. Gov. Mark Warner’s attendance at the Bilderberg meeting in Germany was written up in a series of reports across Virginia. Warner is a Democratic governor in a state that has gone Republican since 1952, with the exception of 1964 when Lyndon Johnson trounced Sen. Barry Goldwater (R-Ariz.). His presence signals that the global elite considers him to be a potential president. Warner, respecting the rules of secrecy, kept the trip off his public calendar. When an Associated Press reporter heard an off-guard comment, Warner admitted attending but refused to divulge information. AP was given the AMERICAN FREE PRESS edition that carried Bilderberg details and the list of participants.

Bilderberg and its brother group, the TRILATERAL COMMISSION, are good at picking future presidents. Actually, they like to own both horses in a two-horse race. Here is the line-up: Jerry Ford, Bilderberg; Jimmy Carter, Trilateral; President Bush the Elder; Trilateral and Bill Clinton, Bilderberg.

How can such a near-total blackout be imposed on what were, not so many years ago, 1,800 daily newspapers (now down to 1,200) in the United States, all of which thump their chests as protectors and practitioners of freedom of speech? When the major newspapers are intimidated, it affects all papers and the wire services. Most of the nation’s newspapers depend entirely on the wire services for news outside their own cities—state, national and world. If Bilderberg is not on the wires, the local editors are as ignorant as I was for 20 years. They work hard to stay ahead of the city council, high school football team and all local news. Similarly, small broadcast outlets depend on their wire services and network affiliates which, in turn, also depend largely on wire services. Wire services operate like farmers’ co-ops. Big-city newspapers pay many times as much for the services as small-town papers. When they tell the wire services to keep silent on Bilderberg, the pressure is obvious. Newspaper participants go to any length to keep their vows of silence. It’s a heady experience for these journalists to clink cocktail glasses with the rich and famous. They do so at the price of the credibility of their own newspapers.

A recent example came at the Bilderberg meeting in the spring of 2002 at Chantilly, Va. At that time, The Washington Post and the entire mainstream media were predicting that the U.S. invasion of Iraq would come “in the late summer or early fall.” But, to appease Europeans who opposed the invasion, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld assured Bilderberg that the invasion would not come until the next year—2003. Jimmy Lee Hoagland, associate editor and columnist at the Post has escorted his publisher to Bilderberg for years. He had to hear Rumsfeld’s assurances. But he let his own newspaper continue with the “late summer or early fall” prediction, knowing it was wrong. He would not even steer his paper straight on the pretense of getting the information elsewhere—too much risk.

 

ONE PERSON WHO STIR’S THE POT AT BILDERBERG:

ALEX JONES!

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

But covering Bilderberg is more than a spring adventure—it is a year-round operation. Two of the most significant Bilderberg exposés occurred during the “off-season” and in unlikely ways.

In March 1985, The Washington Post carried a few lines of type in its society section, noting that David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger had a meeting with Mikhail Gorbachev, head of the then-Soviet Union. The Post described the meeting as productive, and that was all. A check of the Soviet-controlled media revealed enormous details. Rockefeller and Kissinger had told Gorbachev they were sympathetic with the economic stress suffered by the Soviet Union and could arrange for U.S. financial aid to its puppet state of Poland if Americans could observe a “free election.” So it was arranged that Poland would have a “freely elected” national legislature with only one-third of the seats reserved for the entrenched Communist Party. Could you imagine a U.S. election where one-third of Congress is reserved for only Democrats or Republicans? Another one-third of the seats were reserved for the Peasant Party, a wing of the Communist Party that had voted in lockstep with the Kremlin’s dictates for 40 years. But when the “election” was over, young Turks in the Peasant Party seized the moment and voted with members who were truly freely elected to form the government, ousting the communist regime. The fires of freedom then swept Eastern Europe, bringing an end to the Cold War. Based on this information, the still-flourishing Spotlight did an advance story on the downfall of communism in Europe, long before the mainstream media had a hint.

Another significant event occurred when NATO celebrated its 50th anniversary in Washington, D.C. in April 1999. Kenneth Clark, former chancellor of the exchequer in Britain and a longtime Bilderberg luminary, agreed to what he thought would be a “sweetheart session” with a small group of reporters at the National Press Club. I asked the first question, pointing out that he would be attending the Bilderberg meeting in Sintra, Portugal, and inquired about the agenda. The question stunned him. He was too embarrassed to deny Bilderberg when he had been told the city, country, resort and precise dates. He was pounded by questions. Before the hour ended, he had openly acknowledged that Bilderberg intended for the Western Hemisphere to become an “American Union” similar to the European Union. The American Union’s common currency would be the dollar. Clark acknowledged Bilderberg’s plan to develop an Asian-Pacific Union with a third common currency. The world, he confirmed, was to be divided into three great regions for the administrative convenience of the world government emerging under the United Nations. All of this, he said, would come “sooner, rather than later.”

Every year as The Spotlight and now AMERICAN FREE PRESS have pursued Bilderberg, readers have learned what to expect in advance of the mainstream media because those who know are under a vow of silence and the others are ignorant. It was Spotlight readers who turned the beam of publicity on Bilderberg in the European media. That year, 1994, we learned early that Bilderberg would be meeting near Helsinki, Finland. European readers inquired if they should alert the media and the answer was a quick “yes.” The result was extensive press and broadcast coverage that stunned Bilderberg luminaries. Bilderberg has suffered extensive coverage in Europe since. However, media and security control is so tight in the United States that readers have had only limited success in exposing Bilderberg here.

Having built a track record of history confirming our reports, the Washington press corps has become intensely interested in what it cannot report. After each Bilderberg meeting, I carry a load of copies of AMERICAN FREE PRESS containing Bilderberg reportage with me to hand out to reporters who can’t report. Many tell me directly that they consider the mainstream cover-up a scandal.

I normally dislike it when a question is answered with a question. But I have found it effective, over the years, to respond to reporters who say Bilderberg is just a golf outing with:

“If 120 film stars, or 120 professional football players, gathered secretly each year, in a sealed-off resort patrolled by armed guards, you would bust your [expletive deleted] to learn what transpired. Why, then, no curiosity when 120 of the world’s most distinguished leaders in finance and politics gather in that way?”

That question has never been answered.

Read the article here at American Free Press:

images

Read other articles compiled by Infowars below. Will the secretive Bilderberg Group meet in the United States for an unprecedented second year running or is Europe their most likely destination?

 

  1. Bilderberg Sleuths Identify UK As Possible 2010 Location
  2. Bilderberg Elite Angry Over “Constant Exposure”
  3. Breaking: Massive Nuclear Secret Uncovered In Austin, Texas
  4. Chart Shows The Bilderberg Group’s Connection To Everything In The World
  5. ABC News Reports On Secret Meeting Of The Rich, Yet Ignores Bilderberg Completely
  6. Sources Inside Bilderberg Spill Cabal’s Secret Plans
  7. AFP Editor Reports On Secret Gathering Of Trilaterals in Ireland
  8. Bilderberg Mourns: Nationalism Gaining
  9. BBC’s Disinfo Piece: “Bilderberg mystery: Why do people believe in cabals?”
  10. Big Ears: ‘Largest’ secret spy hub uncovered in Israel
  11. Bilderberg-chairman: ‘Bilderberg helped create the Euro’
  12. Hillary & Obama In Secret Bilderberg Rendezvous

The annual Bilderberg meeting is set to take place in Austria this June 2015. Dan Dicks of Press For Truth is joined on the line by Paul Joseph Watson of Infowars to discuss what some of the key talking points will be on the agenda this year as well as what protesters and journalists can expect in regards to dealing with the “cobra anti terror squad”, a whole new level of security for Bilderberg!

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

“The Only Thing Necessary for the Triumph of Evil is that Good Men Do Nothing” - Edmund Burke

Our Congress has an all-time low 9% approval rating, and Obama’s overall popularity is in the toilet. It has been 12 years since I declared war upon the central bankers when they tried to steal my property and that of 300 of my neighbors without one dime being paid in compensation. In that time, I have watched and written about how 13 million homes have been illegally stolen by the MERS mortgage fraud. In Congressional hearings, we have all seen how the IRS harasses and intimidates thousands of enemies of Obama (i.e. the Tea Party) as well as AP reporters who do not report the news in a manner pleasing to the President. 

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE PERMITTED THE PASSAGE OF THE NDAA WHICH ALLOWS GOVERNMENT THE RIGHT TO SECRETLY ARREST PEOPLE WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW AND HOLD THEM INDEFINITELY. 

IN THE EVENT YOU ARE NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE NDAA, ENJOY:

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

WE BARELY NOTICE WHEN OBAMA DECLARED HIMSELF TO BE “KING” AS HE PASSED EXECUTIVE ORDER 13603 IN WHICH HE CAN TAKE EVERYTHING YOU OWN AS WELL AS YOUR FREEDOM AT THE MERE WHIM OF THIS PRESIDENT.

In today’s militarized society, people have an 8 times greater chance of mistakenly being killed by their local police than being killed by a terrorist and on ans on it goes as nobody does anything about it.

 

Even Most of the Awake Act Like Sheep

I have watched millions of our fellow countrymen show evidence that they are in various stages of waking up to the bankster inspired tyranny that is attacking every facet of our lives. The Independent Media has done a marvelous job of reaching the masses despite being ridiculed and shut out of the mainstream media. The Independent Media is being so effective that CONGRESS HAS ATTEMPTED, ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS, TO DECLARE US TO “NOT BE JOURNALISTS” (e.g. courtesy of Dianne Feinstein and John McCain) in several bills that have narrowly failed in Congress.

It is my considered opinion that we have awakened enough people who are collectively capable of making substantial and fundamental differences. THIS BEGS THE QUESTION, THEN WHY DON’T WE SEE A MASSIVE UPRISING AGAINST THE CENTRAL BANKERS AND THEIR INSTITUTIONS OF CONTROL? There is no simple answer which will explain all the fence-sitting we are witnessing in the country today. However, there is one social-psychological factor which explains why the majority of the people who are awake to the present level of tyranny are not sufficiently motivated to act and that factor is called bystander apathy.

 

Bystander Apathy

Sand

The term bystander apathy (i.e. fence sitting) refers to the phenomenon in which the greater the number of people present, the less likely people are to help a person in distress. When an emergency situation occurs, observers are more likely to take action if there are few or no other witnesses.

The most frequently cited example of the bystander effect in introductory psychology textbooks is the brutal murder of a young woman named Catherine “Kitty” Genovese. On Friday, March 13, 1964, the 28-year-old Genovese was returning home from work. While Genvovese approached her apartment entrance, she was attacked and repeatedly stabbed by a man later identified as Winston Moseley.

Despite Genovese’s repeated calls for help, none of the dozen people in the nearby apartment building who heard her cries called the police. The attack first began at 3:20 AM, but it was not until 3:50 AM that someone first contacted police. Genovese’s death was preventable and the failure of her neighbors to report the crime in progress, brought the social-psychology term, bystander apathy, into the national discussion about people’s unwillingness to act in an emergency situation.

There are two major factors that contribute to bystander apathy. FIRST, THE PRESENCE OF OTHER POPULAR CREATES A DIFFUSION OF RESPONSIBILITY. BECAUSE THERE ARE OTHER OBSERVERS, INDIVIDUALS DO NOT FEEL AS MUCH PRESSURE TO TAKE ACTION, SINCE THE RESPONSIBILITY TO TAKE ACTION IS THOUGHT TO BE SHARED AMONG ALL THOSE PRESENT. Generally speaking, the greater the number of people which are present in an emergency, the less likely people are to take action.

The implication of Bystander Apathy would strongly suggest that the more people that are awakened by the Independent Media, the less likely individuals are going to act in defense of life of and liberty against the encroaching bankster tyranny.

The second reason that people refuse to get involved is due to the the need to BEHAVE IN CORRECT AND SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE WAYS. When other observers fail to react, individuals often take this as a signal that a response is not needed or not appropriate. Other researchers have found that onlookers are less likely to intervene if the situation is ambiguous. In the case of Genovese, most of the 38 witnesses reported that they believed that they were witnessing a “lover’s quarrel,” and did not realize that the young woman was actually being murdered. That is like saying the Nazis were only taking the Jews for a weekend holiday and it was all for their own good.

 

Bystander Apathy Is Synonymous With National Suicide

I spoke on the phone with researcher, Deborah Tavares a few nights ago and she informed me that people are already being disappeared off the street, presumably under the NDAA. People are being incarcerated and forcibly medicated against their will. Yet, beyond a few people such as Deborah Tavares, nobody is saying anything about this phenomenon. Deborah will be my guest on my radio show on March 1, 2015 from 9-11pm Central.

One year ago today on February 22, 2014,  I revealed the existence of a classified Army document which has been leaked online, entitled FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations (PDF). The document was originally to be kept secret, but everyone in the military command structure, as far as we know, is not on board with the encroaching tyranny sweeping across this country. Yet, one year later, nobody has done anything about this threat to American civil liberties.

Straight from the Internment/Resettlement article (12 February 2010 FM 3-39.40 1-5) it states the following:

“…I/R operations may place Soldiers in continuous contact with or near insurgents, terrorists, or criminals who will exploit every opportunity to escape and kill or injure U.S. personnel or multinational partners“.

Speaking of our  “Multinational partners”, there are Russian troops training on our soil, along with other UN “Peacekeeping” troops. The above excerpt and the following paragraphs will make it clear regarding the INTENT to use “multinational partners” to round up and detain American citizens.

Tank

For more on foreign troops on our soil see my post titled: OBAMA ALREADY HAS OVER 500,000 FOREIGN TROOPS STATIONED HERE TO ASSIST WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF MARTIAL LAW! Then see some of the following:

Russian troops allowed into the previously conducted Grid EX II simulated EMP attack drill? Russian troops have also been used to police major events on American soil. This is martial law desensitization training in which the Russians are trained to interact with American citizens. Also, FEMA signed a bilateral agreement with the Russian military to PERMIT A MINIMUM OF 15,000 SOLDIERS TO TRAIN ON AMERICAN SOIL and this was at a time when both Russia and China threatened to nuke the United States if we dared to invade Syria or Iran in the Fall of 2013

The following is a quote from the Russian Emergency Situations Ministry:

“The Russian Emergency Situations Ministry and the USA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) are going to exchange experts during joint rescue operations in major disasters. This is provided by a protocol of the fourth meeting of the U.S.-Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission Working Group on Emergency Situations and seventeenth meeting of Joint U.S.-Russia Cooperation Committee on Emergency Situations, which took place in Washington on 25 June 2013.

The document provides for expert cooperation in disaster response operations and to study the latest practices. In addition, the parties approved of U.S.-Russian cooperation in this field in 2013-2014, which envisages exchange of experience including in monitoring and forecasting emergency situations, training of rescuers, development of mine-rescuing and provision of security at mass events.”

Russian defectors have long warned the United States about a MULTI-GENERATIONAL PLOT to conquer the United States from within. [IN OUR COUNTRY, WE MIGHT AS WELL JUST REFER TO THEM AS LIBERALS SINCE THEIR IDEOLOGY IS VIRTUALLY IN LOCK STEP WITH THE COMMUNIST PLANK]We know that former communist inspired Weathermen Underground leader, Bill Ayers, launched Obama’s political career from his Chicago home. Domestic terrorist, Bill Ayers, still visits the White House.

THIS IS THE SAME BILL AYERS THE MEDIA TOLD US WAS HARMLESS. 

AYERS’S PAL LARRY GRATHWOHL DOESN’T AGREE!

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]

NOW, DO I REALLY NEED TO TELL YOU WHAT CAMPS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HERE?

HINT:

Fema-Camp

Despite the public availability to this frightening information, the American sheep and even those that are awake are not even discussing these event, much less doing anything about it.

Conclusion

Dude

Martin Niemöller, a prominent Protestant pastor who opposed the Nazi regime. He spent the last seven years of Nazi rule in concentration camps. Germany, 1937.

It is not difficult to conclude that America is going to continue to fade into the annals of history without so much as a collective whimper. Spare me the “300 hundred million handguns bravado”. Where are they?

When I grew up learning about the Holocaust and read Martin Niemöller’s quote, I never realized that I would someday be living the essence of his quote in modern day America. 

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out— 

Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— 

Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

When you have one of the 2700 newly acquired DHS armored personnel carriers parked outside your home at 3AM, who is going to speak for you?

THE COMMON SENSE SHOW HAS A NEW LISTENING HOME!

Common Sense

LISTEN SUNDAY NIGHTS FROM 9PM-MIDNIGHT (CENTRAL)

 

LISTENING INFORMATION

The easiest way to listen is to click the following icon located in the upper right hand part of the website   http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com

Listen live on Web Stream   http://64.27.20.5:1334/listen.pls

Read the article at the Common Sense Show here:

 

By: Voice of Reason

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

 

THE VOICE OF REASON

Martial Law

FOR MORE LINKS ON MARTIAL LAW:

Keep Your Guns

FOR MORE ON BARACK COMING FOR OUR GUNS!

 

Smirk

LINKS SHOWING OBAMA’S MOTIVES ARE NOT A MYSTERY:

FEMA-2

FOR MORE ON FEMA CAMPS:

 

BE SURE TO CHECK OUT THE GIFT SHOP!

 

 

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 2 comments
  • the Bilderbergers are themselves puppets. The true heads of this conspiracy would never dare show themselves in public. They are high witches who control international finance. Not even Rockerfellers and Rothschilds are above them, Duponts, Carnegies and the rest of the seven or whatever pay alliegiance to them and do their bidding or die.

    • They reside in Zurich Switzerland.

      whats in a name.

      Zu ~ Zoo = thats mankind me and you…to them.

      rich ~ thats them they got and maintain their riches the got and still get off us – the zoo.

      so they are zoo rich ~ get it?

      “Everything that is hidden will be exposed. ” Jesus.

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.