Profile image
By Live Free or Die Alliance
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Citizens weigh in on NH buffer zone law (377 responses; 4/1/15)

Friday, April 10, 2015 14:59
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

By Jacquelyn Benson

Following a Supreme Court dismissal of a similar law in Massachusetts, NH’s “buffer zone” legislation, which established a 25-foot protest free zone around reproductive health clinics, looked to be standing on shaky legal ground. A bill which recently passed the House (HB 403) would repeal the law, which supporters argue could open the state up to costly litigation. On April 1, the Live Free or Die Alliance (LFDA) put the issue to Facebook members, asking, “Should NH repeal the protest-free “buffer zone” around reproductive health clinics?”


Opinion was nearly split, with 52% of those directly answering the question expressing support for a repeal and 48% signaling opposition. A further 39% of total respondents opted not to give a yes or no response, instead addressing their comments to broader issues. In sum, the LFDA received 106 specific comments and 271 concurrences for a total of 377 citizen responses.


Those in favor of a repeal argued that the law infringed upon protestors’ right to free speech. “Protesters still have a right to be on a public sidewalk, even if you disagree with them,” one commenter wrote. “There is no right to anonymity when entering a public building, so unless they're harassed, I don't see the problem,” another argued. “Let’s not open ourselves to pricey litigation,” cautioned a third.


Opponents of a repeal argued that the law was needed for the protection of patients entering clinics. “People going into these clinics deserve their space, and their right to not be harassed,” one commenter said. “Twenty-five feet is certainly close enough to make your feelings known,” another pointed out. “No reason people need to be closer than the buffer zone,” one respondent wrote.


Those addressing their comments to broader issues largely debated the legality of abortion. “No one should interfere in a woman’s choice,” one person wrote. “Turn the abortion clinics into adoption clinics,” suggested another.


The nonprofit, nonpartisan LFDA takes no position on this or any issue, as this report is presented as a summary of citizen testimony. As New Hampshire’s Virtual Town Hall, the LFDA community, numbering more than 59,000, provides objective information on state issues, promotes the civil exchange of opinions, and communicates views to elected officials. To learn more about this issue or the LFDA, visit


Jacquelyn Benson is an Editor with the Live Free or Die Alliance.


Live Free or Die Alliance


Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.