Profile image
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Sister Ciara says Great Cataclysm Of “May 9th” Propels Global Fears

Saturday, April 25, 2015 13:30
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Great Cataclysm Of “May 9th” Propels Global Fears

Special Report from Sister Ciara

In August of 2008, Russian President Vladimir Putin was attending the Summer Olympic Games in Beijing, China…within hours of his arriving, and without any warning, the Western-backed nation of Georgia launched an unprovoked attack against the Russian Federation protected districts of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

In February of 2014, while President Putin was attending the Winter Olympic Games in Sochi, Russia, Western-backed Ukrainian neo-Nazi nationalists, supported by the CIA, staged what the head of Stratfor Global Intelligence (aka: The Shadow CIA), George Friedman, termed the “most blatant coup in history”. The Moscow Victory Day Parade is an historic event, and the largest of its kind, that is going to be held on Red Square in Moscow on 9 May to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the capitulation of Nazi Germany in 1945…and anyone believing that Russia isn’t prepared to not be taken off guard again by any Western provocation against them…like what happened in 2008 in Georgia, and in 2014 in Ukraine, not only doesn’t know about history…they may very well become an unwitting victim of the cataclysm to follow.


Making this potential cataclysm even more dangerous was the United States, Canada and Ukraine stunningly, and without warning, this past November being the only nations in the world to vote against Russia’s anti-Nazism resolution at the United Nations…a simple document condemning attempts to glorify Nazism ideology and denial of German Nazi war crimes…which was a huge psychological blow to a nation which lost over 26 million people in World War II fighting against Hitler and the Nazis as it neared the 70th anniversary of this catastrophic conflict.

To the true and grim reality of what the world is now facing because of the United States blood lust for war was best summarized this past week by the commander of Russia’s Western Military District, Colonel-General Anatoly Sidorov, who stated that the Americans and their Western (NATO) allies are now waging the first phase of hybrid war on Russia. In preparation for the next phase of this war, Russian intelligence sources also reported this past week that the US plans to expand the forward deployment of its armed forces, which, the say, implies the permanent or temporary presence of American troops in the territories of more than 100 countries around the world…making the encirclement of Russia by these Western forces nearly complete.

In order to counter these US-NATO forces Russia’s nuclear doctrine has recently changed to consider the use of nuclear weapons as a way to “de-escalate” a conflict, which in simple terms means…in the event of an attack, or perceived attack, upon Russia, nuclear weapons will be used.

Likewise, the Obama regime has equally planned to use nuclear weapons against both Russia and China…and as best stated by the Former Assistant Treasury Secretary and father of Reaganomics, Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, who recently warned: “Washington not only has war plans for launching a preemptive nuclear attack on Russia, and also possibly China, but Washington has a cadre of people who advocate nuclear war. We have people running around Washington saying things such as ‘What’s the good of nuclear weapons if you can’t use them.”

With 263 wars having been fought on this Earth since 1900 alone killing over a quarter-of-billion people, and with, since 1914, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Ottoman Empire, Emirate of Jabal Shammar (which ruled what is present day Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia), Russian Empire, British Empire, Chinese Empire, German Empire, Japanese Empire, Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union all being destroyed too, one would think our world’s appetite for war would have long ended…but you’d be wrong! And here’s why…

History books record that World War I started when the nations went to war to avenge the assassination of the Archduke Francis Ferdinand, the heir to the Habsburg throne, on 28 June 1914. This is the typical explanation. But the “revisionist historian” knows just what caused and what the purpose was of the conflagration of World War I.

Up until America’s entry into this war, the American people had followed the wise advice of President George Washington given in his farewell address, delivered to the nation on 17 September 1796. President Washington said: “It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliance with any portion of the foreign world…. Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humour or caprice?”

President Washington attempted to warn the American people about getting embroiled in the affairs of Europe. But in 1914, it was not to be. There were those who were secretly planning America’s involvement in World War I whether the American people wanted it or not.

But, the pressure to involve the American government in World War I started in 1909, long before the actual assassination of the Archduke.

Norman Dodd, former director of the Committee to Investigate Tax Exempt Foundations of the US House of Representatives, testified that the Committee was invited to study the minutes of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace as part of the Committee’s investigation.

The Committee stated: “The trustees of the Foundation brought up a single question. If it is desirable to alter the life of an entire people, is there any means more efficient than war…. They discussed this question… for a year and came up with an answer: There are no known means more efficient than war, assuming the objective is altering the life of an entire people. That leads them to a question: How do we involve the United States in a war.” So the decision was made to involve the United States in a war so that the “life of the entire people could be altered.” This was the conclusion of a foundation supposedly committed to “peace.”


keep reading here  …


Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.