Online:
Visits:
Stories:
Profile image
By Voice of Reason
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Now:
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:
Total:

How Can Obama Be Linked to S.C. Shooter? Find Out!

Friday, June 19, 2015 13:09
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Arrest

By: Voice of Reason

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

www.thelastgreatstand.com

 

HILLARY AND OBAMA WASTE NO TIME POLITICIZING THE S.C. MASSACRE…

THE REALITY: OBAMA SHOULD BE CHARGED AS AN ACCOMPLICE TO MURDER!

How can I say that? To begin, in the first video, we see Corrupt Police evidence in Charleston Church shooting. Just like in Sandy Hook, the Boston Bombing, Ferguson, and Baltimore, the official story we’ve been told has more holes than a screen door. The ACTUAL church photographer provides proof the pictures shown ere DOCTORED! Check it out:

In the second video below, Alex Jones goes OFF on liberal leaders for attempting to divide and conquer on a false narrative based on racial politics. In the third video, it becomes clear that the left-wing liberal media has made it look like those who think it was inappropriate for Hillary and Obama to immediately politicize the shooting are wrong to think so. In other words, they are openly supporting the politicizing of the shooting. Disgusting! The fourth video gets to the heart of what is wrong here in America. We have become a Godless nation under Democrat leadership. Recall this is the party that BOOED God at the Democratic Convention. The final video shows that critics are warning that the Obama administration is readying for a “final assault” on Second Amendment rights as the Justice Department plans to move forward on a long list of new gun rules, according to the Hill.

I say that the report from his own FBI and DOJ Investigation that Exposed Obama, Holder & Sharpton Engaging in Racial Politics should be used to demonstrate “Intent” and he be charged as an accomplice to murder in the South Carolina shooting. 

“Obama’s own FBI and DOJ came to the conclusion that Barack Obama, Eric Holder and Al Sharpton are covered with the blood of innocent Missouri citizens, two NYPD officers, and the charred ashes of dozens of entrepreneur’s fortunes. As a direct result of Obama’s sanctioned lies and deceptions – as proven by his own FBI and DOJ – every American can see exactly who Barack Obama is, as a man and as a politician.”

Many states have adopted their own versions of the criminal code, however under the Common Law, an accomplice to a crime was defined as the following:

An accomplice is one who AIDS, ADVISES, or ENCOURAGES the principal in the commission of the crime charged.

Accomplices must also have the requisite INTENT the crime be committed.

Accomplices are liable for CRIME ITSELF and all other FORESEEABLE CRIMES

The only question here is whether or not Obama has had the requisite intent that racial crimes be carried out. Freedom Outpost suggests that Obama absolutely demonstrated intent! 

Freedom Outpost reports :

In the few weeks immediately following the conclusion of the Ferguson jury trial, at least 12 white people in the areas surrounding Ferguson, MO, have been murdered by young black men, gang-land style. The Obama/Holder/Sharpton inspired BlackLivesMatter and HandsUpDontShoot campaigns sprang forth from the malicious Obama lies of omission and his suppression of clear evidence. In fact, the moronic social media campaigns inspired by the Obama, Holder and Sharpton lies led directly to the double murders of two NYPD officers

With facts and evidence this clear, I ask Americans of all ideologies a few simple, yet direct questions: 

What does it say about each of us, as humans, if we refuse to call for the indictment of Obama, Holder and Sharpton for their malicious incitement of riots, fires, multiple murders and civil unrest? 

Are we first and foremost, blacks? Whites? Republicans? Democrats?  Or, are we first and foremost, Americans? What does our collective silence, in light of this FBI/ DOJ evidence, say about our moral courage? 

Barack Obama, Eric Holder and Al Sharpton are covered with the blood of innocent Missouri citizens, two NYPD officers, and the charred ashes of dozens of entrepreneur’s fortunes. As a direct result of Obama’s sanctioned lies and deceptions – as proven by his own FBI and DOJ – every American can see exactly who Barack Obama is, as a man and as a politician. 

Before the bodies of the victims have even gone cold, Hillary and Obama turn the horrific events in Charleston into an opportunity for more gun control. This country does not need more gun control. We need more idiot control. No one dares talk about the REAL story, oh no! Anything but that! 

The REAL story people should be talking about is the deep psychological harm America’s youth have suffered as a result of listening to the President of the United States force feed the country non-stop race-baiting gibberish for 6+ years. In this first video, Alex Jones goes OFF on “so-called” liberals and progressives who are really nothing more than total deviants seeking absolute control over their “subjects.” These “liberals” are really ultra-authoritarian who want to implement “reforms” for the country that are about as “reformative” as throwing someone into a wood chipper!

That last video was done before Ferguson and before Baltimore, so do you think all the race rhetoric has made things better or worse since Alex recorded that? The third video shows that once again, the Narcissist-In-Chief, Obama, made the shooting all about HIM. The man doesn’t have a shred of moral fiber in him. Obama whined, “Too many times I’ve had to stand up here… “ BLAH BLAH BLAH! Furthermore, as the pundits reveal in the clip below, Obama wasn’t even close in his assessment of violence around the world. Lies, Lies, and more Lies! Why isn’t anyone talking about the REAL problem here?

The REAL problem here is America has devolved into a a country without a God, without Morals, and no values to speak of. Liberal absolutely have a religion: It is the religion of opposing Christianity. Remember, it was at the Democratic Convention that they BOOED God! 

 

John Adams, the nation’s second president, famously said:

“We have no government armed in power capable of contending in human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate for the government of any other.”

 

FACTS BE DAMNED… OBAMA IS COMING FOR THE GUNS!

WND Reports: Critics are warning that the Obama administration is readying for a “final assault” on Second Amendment rights as the Justice Department plans to move forward on a long list of new gun rules, according to the Hill.

The report says the agency has proposed the regulations to enact before Obama leaves office.

“It’s clear President Obama is beginning his final assault on our Second Amendment rights by forcing his anti-gun agenda on honest law-abiding citizens through executive force,” Luke O’Dell, vice president of political affairs at the National Association for Gun Rights, told the Hill.

The agency’s plans, released by Unified Agenda, a list of rules that federal bureaucrats are working on, apparently are to focus on people who do not qualify for gun ownership, and stem from Obama’s pursuit of regulations following the school shooting in Sandy Hook.

Obama failed, repeatedly, to get many of those ideas through Congress in the wake of Sandy Hook, and issued 23 executive actions pursuing his aims.

Get “Politically Correct Guns,” the take-no-prisoners invasion of the gun-control crowd’s territory.

The Hill said the proposals will include limits on pistols, requirements for gun storage and more.

It said while gun control groups supported Obama’s call for additional restrictions, Congress has refused to go along.

One of the controversial plans is to ban gun ownership for those who may have been involved in even minor cases of domestic disturbance.

 

By: Voice of Reason

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

www.thelastgreatstand.com

 

THE VOICE OF REASON

Keep Your Guns

FOR MORE ON BARACK COMING FOR OUR GUNS!

Liberal or Stupid

FOR MORE ON THE INSANITY OF LIBERALISM: 

 

GET YOUR LIBERALS ARE COMMUNISTS 

MOUSE PAD TODAY!

 

Mouse Pad

Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 2 comments
  • They can make up all the corporate advisory’s they want but they do not apply to a sovereign public.

    The officers trying to enforce these non-laws should read the below.

    Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law
    enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the
    SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their
    actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]

    Governments Have Descended to the Level
    of
    Mere Private Corporations
    Supreme Court Building
    Clearfield Doctrine
    Supreme Court Annotated Statute, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-
    371 1942
    Whereas defined pursuant to Supreme Court Annotated Statute: Clearfield Trust Co. v.
    United States 318 U.S. 363-371 1942: “Governments descend to the level of a mere
    private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen . . . where
    private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve Notes] and securities [checks] is
    concerned . . . For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as
    entities entirely separate from government.”
    What the Clearfield Doctrine is saying is that when private commercial paper is used by
    corporate government, then government loses its sovereignty status and becomes no
    different than a mere private corporation.
    As such, government then becomes bound by the rules and laws that govern private
    corporations which means that if they intend to compel an individual to some specific
    performance based upon its corporate statutes or corporation rules, then the government,
    like any private corporation, must be the holder-in-due-course of a contract or other
    commercial agreement between it and the one upon who demands for specific
    performance are made.
    And further, the government must be willing to enter the contract or commercial
    agreement into evidence before trying to get the court to enforce its demands, called
    statutes.
    This case is very important because it is a 1942 case that was decided after the UNITED
    STATES CORPORATION COMPANY filed its “CERTIFICATE OF
    INCORPORATION” in the State of Florida (July 15, 1925). And it was decided AFTER
    the ‘corporate government’ agreed to use the currency of the private corporation, the
    FEDERAL RESERVE. The private currency, the Federal Reserve Note, is still in use
    today.
    References:
    (i) Articles of Incorporation of UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY
    http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/articles-of-incorporation-of-u-scorp-
    company.pdf
    (ii) From The Great American Adventure by Judge Dale, retired. (pages 93-94)
    http://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/the-great-american-adventurecomplete-
    work-by-judge-dale.pdf
    [4] Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they
    are a fiction and only exist on paper.
    5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private
    corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to
    conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You
    bet they do!
    6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate
    or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS,
    which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of
    Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did
    you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes?
    For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued
    for violating their corporate regulations?
    [8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law
    enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the
    SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their
    actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]
    (iii) Our Government is Just Another Corporation
    http://anticorruptionsociety.com/is-our-government-just-another-corporation/

  • Who Is “Judge DALE”?

    “Judge DALE” is a hoax. All of the online articles that are fraudulently attributed to “Judge DALE” are also hoaxes. The people behind the hoax have already admitted it to us. This is the reason that you have never seen a photograph, video or live appearance of “Judge DALE”. He does not actually exist.

    There are actually two different people who have fraudulently impersonated “Judge DALE” online and they write about two entirely different subjects in two entirely different styles.

    “Rodney DALE Class” is the original “Judge DALE” (which uses his middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke). Class is actually an amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education who was never a judge. Class and his “editors” first began fraudulently impersonating the “Judge DALE”, a fake “retired federal judge”, in 2009 (a federal felony).

    All of the fake “Judge DALE” articles that appear online on the subject of the “LAW” were written by Class and his “editors”. All of the fake “Judge DALE” articles that appear online on the subject of “DINARS” were written by the late John MacHaffie, who died on January 8th, 2015.

    Here is how it came to be that there were two fake “Judge DALES”. Between 2010 and 2012, the original people who actually created the “Judge DALE Hoax” (“editors”) organized and edited Class’ amateur belief system about “the law” into the two original “Judge DALE” forgeries: “The Matrix And The US Constitution” (April 10th, 2010) and “The Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America” (sometime before May 25th, 2012). These “editors” posted these two original “Judge DALE” forgeries on their own websites.

    Afterwards, these “editors” solicited other likeminded webmasters who would agree to post (or to post links to) these two original “Judge DALE” forgeries on their own websites with full knowledge that these forgeries were fake. These likeminded webmasters played an important role in the “Judge DALE Hoax”. Indeed, two of these webmasters were so enthusiastic about their role in the hoax that they themselves actually wrote and posted additional fake articles online in which they claimed to “know Judge DALE personally” and wherein they purported to quote dialogue that they exchanged with this fictional character (who does not actually exist).

    Arguably, the most important of the likeminded webmasters (who distributed the “Judge DALE” forgeries) was the late John MacHaffie of nesaranews.com. MacHaffie posted articles on his own website on a broad range of subjects. But, he was passionate about the subject of investing in “DINARS” (a gold-backed currency used in some middle-eastern countries) and related subjects like global currency re-set/revaluation and non-disclosure agreements (which MacHaffie claimed were necessary when investing in “DINARS”) . Many people regarded MacHaffie as a genuine authority on the subject of “DINARS” and he had followers reading his “DINAR” articles all over the globe. MacHaffie did not write about the subject of the law. And, Class did not write about the subject of “DINARS”. So, Class and MacHaffie were not competitors for the same readers. Thus, Class’s material and MacHaffie’s material were compatible and Class’ material seemed to be a good fit on MacHaffie’s website, nesaranews.com.

    At first, all went well with the “Judge DALE Hoax”. Readers of the “Judge DALE” forgeries on the websites of these like-minded webmasters actually believed that “Judge DALE” was a real person and that he really was a “retired federal judge”. Readers of the “Judge DALE” forgeries believed the false and utterly delusional claims reflected therein about “the law” and the legal system. And, nobody outside of the “editors” who originally created the “Judge DALE” forgeries and the likeminded webmasters (who distributed the forgeries) knew that the whole thing was one giant hoax intended to dupe and defraud the American people.

    By 2012, the “Judge DALE Hoax” had become an unqualified success. The fictional online character, “Judge DALE”, had become a genuine brand-name with real value among amateur legal theorists, largely as a result of the efforts of these likeminded webmasters, like MacHaffie (who distributed the “Judge DALE forgeries” to his own readers).

    But then, in late May or very early June, 2012, the “editors” who originally created the “Judge DALE Hoax” stole some proprietary information from MacHaffie about “DINARS”, posted it on the websites of all of MacHaffie’s competitors and fraudulently attributed that stolen information to “Judge DALE” (who MacHaffie knew did not actually exist and who MacHaffie had actually helped make into a bona fide internet sensation).

    Needless to say, MacHaffie was livid. In retaliation, on June 4th and 5th, 2012, MacHaffie did two things. First, he posted a formal notice on his website, nesaranews.com, that read, “Judge DALE Is Removed From This Blog” and, without revealing that “Judge DALE” was a hoax, he explained his reasons for banning “Judge DALE” from his website (explained above). Second, and more importantly, MacHaffie actually stole the fake name, “Judge DALE”, for his own use in peddling his own online articles about “DINARS” and he posted his very first “DINAR” article online as the SECOND “Judge DALE”. MacHaffie’s theft and use of the fake name, “Judge DALE”, served several purposes for MacHaffie. First, it taught Class’ editors a lesson about stealing the proprietary intellectual property of others (he simply returned the favor by doing the same thing to them). MacHaffie knew that Class’ editors could not complain publically about what MacHaffie had done to them without revealing their own role in the “Judge DALE Hoax”. Second, MacHaffie’s theft and use of the fake name, “Judge DALE”, had the effect of confusing and confounding “Judge DALE’s” original followers and thereby weakened the value of the “Judge DALE” brand among amateur legal theorists. Third, MacHaffie’s theft and use of the fake name, “Judge DALE”, increased the number of readers of MacHaffie’s articles on the subject of “DINARS”. MacHaffie continued to use the stolen, fake name “Judge DALE” in connection with his own online articles on the subject of “DINARS” until his death on January 8th, 2015. MacHaffie never forgave Class’ editors for what they had done to him.

    This is why since June 4th, 2012, there have been two authors of the online forgeries that have been fraudulently attributed to “Judge DALE”, not one. This is also why there are no “Judge DALE” forgeries that were ever posted online that relate to the subject of “DINARS” until after June 4th, 2012. This is why all of the “Judge DALE” forgeries that appeared online before June 4th, 2012 related exclusively to the subject of the law. This is also why, since June 4th, 2012, the “Judge DALE” forgeries posted online address two entirely unrelated subjects (the subject of the LAW and the subject of “DINARS”). This also explains why “Judge DALE”, an alleged “retired federal judge” would, on June 4th, 2012, suddenly and inexplicably start writing articles about the subject of “DINARS”, a subject about which no “retired federal judge” would have any interest, knowledge or expertise anyway. This also explains why there is such a profound difference in the quality of the writing between the two types of “Judge DALE” forgeries that appear online. Those “Judge DALE forgeries” on the subject of the LAW that appear to have been written by a high school student (as edited by other high school students) were written by Class and his editors. Those “Judge DALE forgeries” on the subject of “DINARS” (global currency re-set/re-valuation and NDA’s) that appear to have been written by an intelligent, articulate, educated, literate person were written by the late “John MacHaffie. This is also why no new “Judge DALE” forgeries on the subject of “DINARS” have been posted online since MacHaffie’s death on January 8th, 2015. Finally, this is why new “Judge DALE” forgeries on the subject of the LAW continue to be posted online despite MacHaffie’s death (Class and his “editors” remain alive to post new “Judge DALE” forgeries online about the subject of the LAW).

    Either way, there is no real “retired federal judge” who wrote any of the “Judge DALE” forgeries that appear online. Either way, “Rodney DALE Class” was the original “Judge DALE” and was the namesake for the fictional online character, “Judge DALE” (which uses Class’ middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke). Either way, “Judge DALE” is a hoax. Either way, all of the online articles that are fraudulently attributed to “Judge DALE” are also hoaxes.

Top Stories
Recent Stories

Register

Newsletter

Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.