| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
The Saker asks ‘Did Russia just “gently” threaten the USA?’
Did Russia just “gently” threaten the USA? | The Vineyard of the Saker
Interesting stuff today. A major Russian TV channel just aired a
report about Putin meeting with his top military commanders. I don’t
have the time to translate what Putin said word for word, but basically
he said that the USA had refused every single Russian offer to negotiate
about the US anti-missile system in Europe and that while the US had
initially promised that the real target of this system was Iran, now
that the Iranian nuclear issue had been solved, the US was still
deploying the system. Putin added that the US was clearly attempting to
change the world’s military balance. And then the Russian footage showed this:
According to the Kremlin was mistakenly leaked secret document. And just to make sure that everybody got it, RT wrote a full article in English about this in an article entitled “‘Assured unacceptable damage’: Russian TV accidentally leaks secret ‘nuclear torpedo’ design“. According to RT
The presentation slide titled “Ocean Multipurpose System: Status-6” showed some drawings of a new nuclear submarine weapons system. It is apparently designed to bypass NATO radars and any existing missile defense systems, while also causing heavy damage to “important economic facilities” along the enemy’s coastal regions. The footnote to the slide stated that Status-6 is intended to cause “assured unacceptable damage” to an adversary force. Its detonation “in the area of the enemy coast” would result in “extensive zones of radioactive contamination” that would ensure that the region would not be used for “military, economic, business or other activity” for a “long time.” According to the blurred information provided in the slide, the system represents a massive torpedo, designated as “self-propelled underwater vehicle,” with a range of up to 10 thousand kilometers and capable of operating at a depth of up to 1,000 meters.
Actually, such ideas are nothing new. The late Andrei Sakharov had already proposed a similar idea to basically wipe out the entire US East Coast. The Russians have also look into the possibility to detonate a nuclear device to set off the “Yellowstone Caldera” and basically destroy most of the USA in one shot. While in the early years following WWII the Soviets did look into all sort of schemes to threaten the USA with destruction, the subsequent development of Soviet nuclear capabilities made the development of this type of “doomsday weapons” useless. Personally, I don’t believe for one second that the Russians are now serious about developing such system as it would be literally a waste of resources. So what is going on here?
This so-called “leak” of “secret documents” is, of course, no leak at all. This is a completely deliberate action. To imagine that a Russian journalist could, just by mistake, film a secret document (helpfully held up for him by a general) and then just walk away, get it passed his editor and air it is laughable. Any footage taken in a meeting of the President with his senior generals would be checked many times over. No, this was a deliberate way to remind the USA that if they really are hell-bent on spending billions of dollars in a futile quest to create some kind of anti-missile system Russia could easily develop a cheap weapon system to still threaten the USA with total annihilation. Because, make no mistake, the kind of long range torpedo being suggested here would be rather cheap to build using only already existing technologies. I would even add that rather than setting such a weapon off the US coast the system could also be designed to fire off a secondary missile (ballistic or cruise) which could then fly to any inland target. Again, such technologies already exist in the Russian military and have even been deployed on a smaller scale. See for yourself:
Coming back to the real world, I don’t believe for one second that any type of anti-missile system could be deployed in Europe to shield NATO the EU or the US from a Russian retaliatory strike should the Empire ever decide to attack Russia. All the East Europeans are doing is painting a cross-hair on themselves as these will be the very first targets to be destroyed in case of a crisis. How? By use of special forces first and, if needed, by Iskander missile strikes if all else fails. But the most likely scenario is that key components of the anti-missile system will suddenly experience “inexplicable failures” which will render the entire system useless. The Russians know that and so do the Americans. But just to make sure that everybody got the message the Russians have now shown that even a fully functional and survivable US anti-missile system will not protect anybody from a Russian retaliation.
The sad thing is that US analysts all fully understand that but they have no say in a fantastically corrupt Pentagon. The real purpose of the US program is not to protect anybody against a non-existing Russian threat, but to dole out billions of dollars to US corporations and their shareholders. And if in the process the US destabilizes the entire planet and threatens the Russians – then “to hell with ‘em Russikes! We are the indispensable nation and f**k the rest of the planet!” Right?
Wrong.
What happened today is a gentle reminder of that.
The Saker
Source: http://blogdogcicle.blogspot.com/2015/11/the-saker-asks-did-russia-just-gently.html
/alternative/2015/11/urgent-u-s-officials-are-warning-that-enough-enriched-uranium-to-make-a-nuclear-bomb-is-in-the-hands-of-russian-black-marketers-3242186.html
Did the US just threaten Russia.
No, I’d say it’s just The Saker, trying to sucker YouTube views.
You’re thinking the Russian government is an accomplice, then. They leaked what they said was a secret document, to increase someone’s YouTube views.
I doubt that. But don’t get this wrong: When the US claims to have all kinds of knowledge about enriched uranium in the hands of whoever can buy it (read: ISIS from its oil revenue) that is a threat of nuclear terrorism. By the United States. Against the alleged source of the uranium, Russia.
“You’re thinking…” What?! (It could be fluoride, after all.) No, wasn’t really commenting on anything such, as I can perceive by the wildest stretch, anyway, merely pointing out the motivation for articles by the click whores, that is the incessant need to try and lure a stream of YouTube views for money. Without an army of click monkeys, they’d need to get a real job. But I leave the exposure of Russian or American top secrets, as well as deeper secrets of the universe, found by Googling, of course, to others, also realizing that, like a butt hole, everybody has an opinion. Though this doesn’t mean it’s a good one, or even has the slightest nexus with reality.
Whatever the case, just remember, does the headline strike you as better than Spiderman No. 2? We have just the video for you!
Since you missed the point of the article, AGAIN, here it is.
Russia leaked information about a nuclear attack device that we cannot intercept.
Why would Russia do that? Russia would do that to caution the US against general war.
That is important news. It can be found on the internet, where one can find other important news.
I recommend looking for facts, and checking facts, in this way.
Contrary to what you said, over and over, your Grand Unified YouTube theory does not explain everything in the world.