Active Navy Speaks Out Against the U.S. Government’s Secret War on Family (Video)

(Before It's News)

What would you say if I told you that judges, politicians, and various special interest groups actually receive a “commission” to their state, for child support payments that are imposed on the noncustodial spouse of a child in a family law hearing? Furthermore, what would you say if I told you that a judge who assigns $300 a month in child support from a noncustodial spouse then gets $300 taken from federal Social Security Coffers that can then be given back to US State into one of their various welfare programs? 

As crazy as it sounds, if you happen to live in a poor area where there are limited welfare programs available, is it any shock that certain activist  judges might require a noncustodial parent to pay more in child support, knowing the federal match would go to help other families within the judge’s community? According to the article below from nationalparentsorganization.org, many studies show that the average is that for every one dollar collected in child support, one dollar is released from Social Security Coffers, and can then be given back to US States to be put toward welfare programs. 

Now, listen to the plight of this active duty military member who is patiently waiting outside a Trump rally to ask Trump where he stands on the issue of Child Support Enforcement And The Social Security Act Title Iv-D Program. The active service member talks about how active servicemen are discriminated disproportionately when it comes to family law, and the fundamental rights granted to them under the Constitution, are stripped away without due process under an unconstitutional Child Support Enforcement And The Social Security Act Title Iv-D Program, for the purpose of raising money for the states’ other welfare programs. 

The man in the video freely admits his marriage may have failed, but says that does not mean he walked out on his children. He goes on to say his ex-wife knows how to manipulate the system, so by merely walking into a court and saying she feels threatened, this man, and many like him, are prevented from having any further access to their families because of what is known as the “silver bullet” provision, or basically the concept that he’s guilty until proven innocent, which runs DIRECTLY contrary to our system of law and the Supreme Court’s holding in Stanley v. Illinois 405 U.S. 645 (1972).  

SUBSCRIBE TO  THE TOP STORIES OF THE WEEK IN THE NEWSLETTER HERE

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

FOR MORE NEWS BY VOICE OF REASON CLICK HERE!

The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment applies against the federal government, and provides that “no person shall be…deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” The Due Process Clause contains a substantive component that guarantees certain fundamental rights, including the right to raise one’s own child. 

As a FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, the only way the government can interfere is if the method in which they do so its the LEAST RESTRICTIVE means possible to achieve a compelling government interest (presumably to keep the child safe). Because it is a FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, there CANNOT be a less restrictive way to achieve the government interest, and the law should CANNOT be over/under inclusive. Furthermore, the BURDEN is on the GOVERNMENT to prove the noncustodial spouse is deserving of the removal of the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT to see their child.  

In Stanley v. Illinois 405 U.S. 645 (1972) the court was very clear when it said:

1. Under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment petitioner was entitled to a hearing on his fitness as a parent before his children were taken from him. 

(a) The fact that petitioner can apply for adoption or for custody and control of his children does not bar his attack on the dependency proceeding.

(b) The State cannot, consistently with due process requirements, merely presume that unmarried fathers in general, and petitioner, in particular, are unsuitable and neglectful parents. Parental unfitness must be established on the basis of individualized proof. See Bell v. Burson,

2. The denial to unwed fathers of the hearing on fitness accorded to all other parents whose custody of their children is challenged by the State constitutes a denial of equal protection of the laws.

In the video, the service member described the process by which his constitutional rights were clearly violated. The Supreme Court in Stanley v. Illinois was very clear when it established the right to raise one’s own child as a “FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT.” 

We don’t know the full story, but in the video anyway, all this service member is asking for is equal protection and due process under the law without being financially, mentally, and emotionally raped because he wants to be a father to his child. In this instance, based on a mere allegation he was “dangerous,” he says the court stripped him of many of his other Fundamental Rights without notice or a hearing, the two requirements necessary for removal of a Fundamental Right.

The serviceman goes on to make the SHOCKING claims that 3/4 OF HOMELESS VETERANS are homeless because they are unable to meet the child support needs placed on them by the courts. When there are many studies show that on average, for every one dollar collected in child support, one dollar is released from Social Security Coffers which can then be given back to various state welfare programs, it begs the question: Is that power being abused by those who hold it? 

NationalParentsOrganization.org writes:

In this article, we are going to focus on the federal program of child support enforcement that every state in the United States adheres to in an effort to secure money from non-custodial parents and diverts it to custodial parents so that these parents can then use the money for their children. Well sorta. The problem with child support enforcement is that this agency has a forward facing public side that most people have been socialized to accept. When thinking about child support, and the enforcement of non-custodial parents, we surmise that most people believe that enforcement is a wonderful program that has the SOLE purpose of taking care of children. And, it most cases this is true. 

Nobody at Fathers and Fathers has any problem with both parents supporting their children, and if one parent is purposefully absent then enforcement of child support is a good thing. However, there is a rear facing side of child support enforcement that is not well known or talked about much by Judges, Politicians, and many special interest groups; this fact being that there is an industry surrounding enforcement that is replenishing money for Welfare, TANF, and other Low Income Assistance Programs. In looking at the Federal Social Security Act, Title IV, Part D, Section 458, you will see language that allows the US Federal Government to give back “Incentive Payments” to US states for performance based child support collection, paternity establishment, and administrative costs. 

Typically, these incentive payments go back to social services programs because the thinking is after a divorce many women will end up using programs like TANF and Welfare for which US States have little money in their budgets for. While the exact amount of money is hard to define because of performance, and the fact that different states get back different amounts, many studies show that the average is that for every one dollar collected in child support, one dollar is released from Social Security Coffers that can then be given back to US States.

Read the rest of the article HERE:

SUBSCRIBE TO  THE TOP STORIES OF THE WEEK IN THE NEWSLETTER HERE

FACEBOOK | GOOGLE+ | TWITTER | PINTEREST | STUMBLE UPON | TUMBLER

FOR MORE ON LIBERALISM: THE IDEOLOGY OF HATE, GENOCIDE, & IDIOCY:

News Flash: Being Offended Doesn’t Make You Right (Video)

Millennials: History Tells Us Socialism Always Ends in Genocide (Video)

Secret Audio Of Hillary Clinton’s Real Plans For Guns Leaks Out (Videos)

Black Lives Matter Do The Unthinkable To War Heroes Graves

Arrest Trump For “Hate Speech” Hysteria Begins – Global Elites Frantic (Video)

Top 10 Liberal Lies About The Constitution

Stop Asking Hillary Questions, She Promises to Stop Lying! (Video)

Stop Censorship: Time For Us All to Finally Break Google, Facebook and Twitter?

Florida Drunken College Students ‘Urinate and Spit’ On Wounded Veterans

Court Ok’s Removing Flag At School To Avoid “Offending” Anyone

Ninth Circuit Rules American Flag “UNSAFE” For School

“Americans Going Over the Cliffs of Insanity” (Video)

Peter Schiff: This Is Who Really Determines U.S. Presidents

George Carlin Rips on Liberal Insanity

New Study Shows Liberals Have a Lower Average IQ Than Conservatives

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

FACEBOOK | GOOGLE+ | TWITTER | PINTEREST | STUMBLE UPON | TUMBLER

DONATIONS ACCEPTED VIA PAYPAL TO GET THE RADIO SHOW RUNNING…

AND THEN TO HELP KEEP SPREADING THE MESSAGE!

COMING SOON TO INTERNET RADIO!

STAY TUNED!

WWW.THELASTGREATSTAND.COM

FACEBOOK | GOOGLE+ | TWITTER | PINTEREST | STUMBLE UPON | TUMBLER

• Judge's outrage at suspect who 'robbed a 103-year-old woman of her food and money' in her apartment building
• Head in the Sanders, up Hillary creek, without a Trump card
• Is the 2016 election already being stripped & flipped?
• Don’t listen to what they say, look at what they do
• The cowards’ wars
• Ron Paul’s Texas Straight Talk 4/4/16: Reflections on The Anniversary of Yet Another Pointless War
• FLASHBACK: Ted Cruz responds to ‘globalist’ smear (video)
• Yemen update 4/3/2016..Saudi royal family teetering on edge of collapse
• #PanamaPapers OffShore Victims
• Why Are You Still On the Trump Train?