Profile image
By RedState (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

The Trump Camp’s Cyber-War on Ted Cruz

Saturday, April 23, 2016 16:17
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

Most of us think that we have the freedom to choose a candidate and vote for that candidate. But in order to choose the right candidate, we need reliable information.

Something unique has been happening, that prevents a large segment of the electorate from getting that information: The Trump team and its surrogates have driven a massive, unprecedented smear campaign against Ted Cruz that is damaging our system of free and informed voting. Integral to this campaign is an immense dissemination of slanted news and untruths over the Internet.

Emblematic of this initiative is the epithet “Lyin’ Ted,” which Trump has not only used over and over in speeches, but has tweeted countless times. Since Trump has over 7 million Twitter followers, this reaches a very large audience. As a result, his supporters firmly believe Cruz is a liar and spread the epithet further around the Internet – though Trump has provided no backup for the slur.

Also significant are Cruz hit pieces published in once-reputable news outlets. A number of them were penned by Trump ally and trickster Roger Stone. These skirt reality, or drift over the line into utter falsehood.

In a lie-laden Daily Caller piece from January, “Who Is the Real Ted Cruz,” Stone writes, “Heidi is a proud member of the lefty Council on Foreign Relations, advocates of one world government and the New World Order.” First, she left CFR four years ago. Second: this refers to a pathetically untrue conspiracy theory about the “North American Union,” which never existed and never will.

The NAU’s fictitious mission was to erase the borders separating Mexico, America and Canada. The notion was thoroughly debunked in a 2008 article, along with a study of the types that believe the myth, some not so pleasant. There’s been no sign of the NAU, in the years since. This slur has been repeated endlessly by Trump supporters who read it on one of the innumerable Cruz slander sites or on Facebook pages carrying long lists of fabrications about Cruz.

Interestingly, at the March 3rd debate when Bret Baier asked Trump whom he trusts for national security, Trump named Richard Haass, the president of CFR.

Breitbart published this clearly false article, under the byline of Dan Riehl, but almost the entire text is consists of a Roger Stone attack on Cruz. Here’s a small sample:

“’Having worked very hard to collect evidence of voter fraud and irregularities in Oklahoma, Kansas, Utah, Hawaii and Texas, frankly, they ought to put the handcuffs on him,’ said Stone, referring to Ted Cruz.”

Then we come to the astronomically vast network of pro-Trump, anti-Cruz sites. A conservative blog,, put out by author and tea party activist Ulysses S. Arn, with contributors from Illinois Conservatives, gives an overview of this genre in an article titled, “Cleaning Up The Mess Trump Supporters Have Made Of The Internet.”

It notes that Roger Stone cited, in a Daily Caller op-ed, a hit piece in TheConservativeTreeHouse about Trump critics Mark Levin, Glenn Beck and Erick Erickson, which implies that all three were paid off to oppose Trump. writes that TreeHouse “is and has been a pro-Trump blog all cycle.”

TreeHouse comprises one complimentary Trump story after the other, with an open thread for Trump supporters to post or comment. It’s reported that TheConservativeTreeHouse had 5 million visits in March.

UsofArn moves on to the genre of outright fake-story sites, promoting Trump and bashing Cruz. One of the most popular is, published by Alex Portelli, a reformed ex-con. It was ably exposed by The Washington Post:

On several occasions in October, Donald Trump tweeted links to stories at, a blog that didn’t exist during the last election cycle. One story (now offline but copied here) indicated that Trump’s support from blue-collar workers was the highest since Franklin Roosevelt in the 1930s.

It’s not clear what the basis for the claim was beyond that Trump led in Rust Belt states — like Ohio, which he lost — but, no matter. Trump was enthusiastic.

Prntly popped up again last week as the source of a rumor about the Ted Cruz campaign. The site cut and pasted an old story about Cruz’s campaign manager, Jeff Roe. The headline suggested that perhaps Roe had approved the ad attacking Melania Trump run by an anti-Trump super PAC, but it offered no evidence to that effect.

It was, in other words, a very typical Prntly article: Mostly content from somewhere else with an unabashedly pro-Trump frame overlaid, and then shared by one of the site’s two apparent authors, Connor Balough or Shelby Carella.

 A recent story is headlined: “BOMB SHELL Documents: Cruz and Clinton see eye to eye: selling drought Arizona water to Saudi Arabia companies.”

What does Alex Portelli get out of this? Trump, who has millions of Twitter followers, tweets links to Prntly stories, and the site carries advertising.

Another popular pro-Trump, anti-Cruz website is the Marshall Report. Here’s a sample of a “report”:

“Cruz your smile is turning into a slit and your snake tongue is poking out.  The world has watched in disbelief at the mockery you have turned both the constitution and the will of the people into. I hear people in other nations shouting – “Trump was right!” on many issues!  I have never heard anyone say Cruz was right on anything.”

It’s difficult to believe that any person of reasonable intelligence would scroll beyond that statement, seeking news, but if they did, they’d find Cruz birtherism and other anti-Cruz statements, plus Trump videos; one was introduced by:

“It is time to stand up America! Yes people are angry, they are watching all the lies and corruption of empty suits that are hired and paid to lie, cheat and steal!” [Grammatical errors are from the original.]

Trump supporters read and share “news” from these sites and from numerous other sites that duplicate their content. Marshall Report’s web traffic is reported at over 331,000 views in March; is reported at over 792,000 visits in March.

Perhaps even more amazing is this story, in

In the wake of the Wisconsin primary, … supporters of Donald Trump took to social media posting what appeared to be valid news reports making fraudulent claims that electronic voting machines in Wisconsin were switching from Donald Trump to Ted Cruz.

This particular fake story … was distributed ad nauseum all over social media. But the bogus story or a variation of it was additionally cited at many other pro-Trump propaganda websites, which were also shared repeatedly on social media.”

[Analysis provided to Examiner] revealed that the following pro-Trump propaganda sites sprung up in only the past several months from Macedonia, a nation bordering Greece. Using the website ICANN WHOIS, John Daniels [editor-in-chief of] was able to determine the registrar, origination date and location of these websites:
Articles about fake voter fraud in Wisconsin and claims that Ted Cruz will be dropping out of the presidential race (he is not) were posted at all of the above sites. They linked back to other pro-Trump sites such as, and

The curious fact that pro-Trump websites are originating from a Russian-leaning Slavic outpost in southeastern Europe raises questions, particularly considering the strange alliance between Donald Trump and pro-Russia conservative outlets such as InfoWars and Michael Savage.

This also seems linked to Donald Trump’s “bromance” with Vladimir Putin, and the fact that the Trump campaign is now in the hands of Paul Manafort. The Washington Free Beacon reported that “he formerly served as a senior adviser to recently ousted Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych, a close ally of Russian president Vladimir Putin.”

Daniels told “These websites represent at best ‘click bait’; [a]t worst they are an attempt to mold the emotions and opinions of the voting public.

The post The Trump Camp’s Cyber-War on Ted Cruz appeared first on RedState.


Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 1 comment
  • Typical Red State spin. How about some ‘objective reportage’ Red State instead of blatant shilling. I’ve bookmarked as many of your posts as I can so one day I can post them for everyone to review how off-base and biased your post are. How about caring about your country first … and putting your petty politicking second? Wow … what a novel idea!

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.