Profile image
Story Views

Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

High Crimes: The Impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama.

Thursday, August 11, 2016 8:56
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

(Before It's News)

High Crimes:  The Impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama

By Brooks Agnew


The claim that America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists and hostage takers no longer is true.  Reports have revealed that the Obama administration organized an airlift to smuggle $400 million in cash to Iran in an unmarked cargo plane in January of 2016.  But it gets worse than this.  Much worse.

This is what part of the mainstream media is trying to sell us.  Reports say wooden pallets stacked and shrink-wrapped with a variety of currencies were loaded onto an unmarked cargo plane and flown to Iran. The Wall Street Journal reports that American officials procured the money from banks in Switzerland and the Netherlands.  Actually, no bank would allow cash in such quantities to be deposited.  International and US laws prohibit the movement of quantities of cash, specifically because it is not traceable to its source.   Circumventing laws designed to levy economic sanctions against America’s enemies is a felony.

It is no longer legal to make large car payments or purchases in cash.  You can’t make mortgage payments at the bank in cash.  If you are caught with cash, law enforcement is authorized to confiscate it as though the cash itself committed a crime under civil forfeiture laws.  Cash is the currency of crime.

The Obama Administration has accumulated billions in unlaundered cash from the sale of, or by permitting the sale of, illegal drugs.  This cash sits in warehouses and has been used to fund criminal activities and terrorism.  It is used to buy influence.  It is used to trade for arms, political favors or for lives.  Cash cannot be traced.  It cannot be accounted for.  Boxes or thick envelopes of cash shipped to government officials have purchased more elections than anything else. 

Valerie Jarrett is the Iranian co-president of the United States and has been feeding favors and preferential treatment to Iran since she has been in the White House.  The planned excuse of old settlement payments for weapons Iran tried to buy way back in the last century was queued up in case the public pointed out that Iran was releasing Washington Post reporter Jason Rezaian, former U.S. Marine Amir Hekmati, Christian pastor Saeed Abedini, and Nosratollah Khosravi-Roodsari the same exact day the cash arrived. 

It was actually Iranian official news sources that reported at the time that the prisoners were released in a “prisoner for cash” agreement brokered by the Obama administration.  The mainstream news media kept this a guarded secret for more than seven months. 

The administration also returned seven Iranian prisoners in exchange for the release of the Americans. Obama also dropped extradition proceedings against another 14 Iranians as part of the deal.  Not only did the administration return seven Iranians but it was said Obama also agreed to drop U.S. sanctions against Iran as the nuclear deal was being crafted.  The sudden January 2016 prisoner release was meant to keep Republicans from criticizing Obama’s nuclear deal.  But the American people did not know Obama was paying a ransom for those hostages.  They didn’t care that he was digging into his stash of drug cartel money to keep that payment off the books.  They didn’t care that Obama had just violated powerful economic sanctions.

Mr. Obama is actually laughing at law enforcement, because he knows their network of corruption is tight and has been tested in public with the recent decision by the FBI not to prosecute Hillary Clinton, although the Director spent 14 minutes describing a litany of statutory violations.  He clearly and publicly stated the facts of perjury before Congress.  Still, because she is the Democrat nominee, no charges have been filed.  It remains to be seen if the electorate decides to judge her in the court of public opinion.

Arkansas Republican Senator Tom Cotton criticized the revelations accusing Obama of paying a “ransom to the ayatollahs for U.S. hostages.”  A claim, it would seem, for which the mainstream media has absolutely no interest whatsoever.

The truth is that Obama does not fear Miss Step-and-Fetch, the Attorney General.  He does not fear the FBI Director, James Comey.  And now, it is clear that he does not fear the American people.

At a press conference Thursday (4 August 2016), Obama remarkably explained with an arrogant smile on his face, “The reason that we had to give them cash is precisely because we are so strict in maintaining sanctions and we do not have a banking relationship with Iran.”

Really Mr. President? The whole point of sanctions is to prohibit and punish anyone — especially you, Mr. President — for violating them.  Now, the sanctions at issue exclude Iran from the U.S. financial system by prohibiting Americans and financial institutions from engaging in currency transactions that involve Iran’s government.  Period. 

To this day, Iran remains on our government’s list of state sponsors of terrorism. Clinton’s state-of-emergency declaration has been annually renewed ever since.  Obama has been renewing the state of emergency since 2009 — most recently, just five months ago.  

It is not just U.S. dollar transactions that are prohibited; foreign currency is also barred. Obama’s cash payment, of course, involved both — a fact we’ll be revisiting shortly.  The US Treasury Statutes cite ITSR (Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations), the part of the Code of Federal Regulations that implements anti-terrorism sanctions initiated by President Clinton under federal law.  You get that?  This relates to anti-terrorism sanctions!

The specific provision cited is Section 560.204, which states: The exportation, reexportation, sale, or supply, directly or indirectly, from the United States, or by a United States person, wherever located, of any goods, technology, or services to Iran or the Government of Iran is prohibited.  This Federal regulation goes on to stress that this prohibition may not be circumvented by exporting things of value “to a person in a third country” when one has “knowledge or reason to know that” such things are “intended specifically for supply, transshipment, or reexportation, directly or indirectly, to Iran or the Government of Iran.”

Obama admitted committing this high crime at his press conference.   He admitted that he has full knowledge these sanctions are still in effect and that they applied directly to his $400 million pay-out to our terrorist enemies.  But here’s the president’s problem: While he is correct that the sanctions barred him from sending Iran a check or wire transfer, that is not all they forbid — not by a long shot. They also make it illegal to do exactly and specifically what he did. As noted above, the sanctions prohibit transactions with Iran that touch the U.S. financial system, whether they are carried out in dollars or with foreign currencies.

Section 560.203 states: Evasions; attempts; causing violations; conspiracies: . . . Any transaction . . . that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this part is prohibited. . . . Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this part is prohibited.   Obama is clearly guilty of conspiracy to violate the law.

By his own admission on national television, President Obama engaged in the illegal cash transfer in violation of sanctions that prohibit the U.S. from having “a banking relationship with Iran.” The point of the sanctions is to prevent Iran from getting value from or through our financial system.  And the point of sanctions, if you happen to be the president of the United States sworn to execute the laws faithfully, is to follow them — not to brag before the whole world on live TV that you willfully violated them.

The president’s press conference is better understood as a confession than an explanation. Oh, and there is also Section 560.701, which makes clear that willful violations of the regulations constitute serious felony offenses under federal criminal law — punishable by up to 20 years’ imprisonment.

There are two more laws he violated.  The first is the law against providing material support to terrorists, Section 2339A of the federal penal code. It says that anyone who provides resources — including “currency or monetary instruments” — to a person or entity with knowledge that they are to be used in the preparation or carrying out of terrorism offenses is guilty of a serious felony.  As we note above, the Obama administration has just reaffirmed that Iran remains a state sponsor of terrorism. Moreover, in Friday’s National Review editorial: [Secretary of State] John Kerry even admitted back in January that funds channeled to Iran as part of the nuclear deal would “end up in the hands of the IRGC [Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps] or other entities, some of which are labeled terrorists.”  Obama’s off-the-books smuggling makes it even more likely the $400 million will be used for terrorism, because it was all in untraceable drug cartel cash.  In fact, we do not know if was only $400 million.  It could have been more, or less.  We don’t know who took “handling charges” along the way.   What’s a million dollars here or there?  Iran likes to deny its complicity in jihadist acts; so now, flush with cash, it can fund atrocities without even leaving an audit trail.

The second law involves money laundering, criminalized by Congress in Section 1956 of the penal code. There are several prohibited varieties of money laundering.  It can be a crime, for example, for anyone to conduct a financial transaction greater than $10,000 using cash.  Once the money is accepted into Iran’s banking system, it then can be used for any purpose without a need to report its origin.  Hence, the drug cartel cash was cleaned and ready to enter the economy the instant it arrived in Iran.

The administration has conducted a financial transaction which facilitated both currency transfers to Iran and Iran’s certain use of the money to support terrorism. Plus, the money was shipped outside the United States before being transferred to Iran.  Money-laundering cases often boil down to proof of intent; but there clearly are multiple grounds on which to investigate whether the laws have been transgressed.   We the people have a televised confession which includes his motive, the authority, and the opportunity to commit these high crimes.

The circumstances of Obama’s act of cash smuggling to our terrorist enemies means the president has deliberately violated the law with malice and forethought and must therefore be impeached and removed from office.  Immediately.

Report abuse


Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Top Stories
Recent Stories



Email this story
Email this story

If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.