Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
Story Views | |
Now: | |
Last Hour: | |
Last 24 Hours: | |
Total: |
Posted: September 6, 2012 | Author: christofpierson
Whenever I read an account of the lead-up to the Iraq war, I usually marvel over how much the critics of the war got right. We guessed Saddam was not lying about weapons of mass destruction. We knew from the beginning the Bushists were going to have the war no matter what anyone else said. We knew they had been planning it all along. We knew they were not going to topple Saddam and *poof* like magic a wonderful new Iraq would appear. We knew they had let the sectarian monster out of the labyrinth. We knew they didn’t give a shit about the members of the military they were using and reusing and reusing again and again to fight their war. We knew!
Continued below.
H3n2v And West Nile Update–Bio-Weapons Loosed?
Here’s How Facebook Is Tracking Your Internet Activity
What Made Them Leap Out Of The Twin Towers?
Experts Warn Of “Perfect Storm” For Global Economy
China’s Yangtze River “Turns Blood Red” And Turns Up A Mystery
Booming Trumpet Of The Apocalypse In Costa Rica 2012 Prophecy Unfolds
Obama Goes Full Witchcraft By Telling Voters They Can Do Something About Droughts,Floods,Wildfires
Now I find out, the truth was probably even weirder than we suspected.
Vanity Fair has a six-page excerpt from Kurt Eichenwald’s 500 Days: Secrets and Lies in the Terror Wars up on its site and its an eye-opening read. Most of it confirms what critics suspected. I always did know Bush was an embarrassment, but if the following scene Eichenwald describes actually took place… well, there just are no words! This is alleged to have occurred in a phone call between the two world leaders as Bush was trolling for support for his Iraq policy from UN Security member nations, at the insistence of Tony Blair, in the late fall of 2003:
““Jacques,” he said, “You and I share a common faith. You’re Roman Catholic, I’m Methodist, but we are both Christians committed to the teachings of the Bible. We share one common Lord””
Spoken like the politician he is, consensus and majority have always been political terms. Christianity was first used in the USA by Kennedy to unite the catholics, baptists, mormons, and all the other thousands of subcults into a politcal majority. The fact religion relies on consensus as its majority power base, proves religions are nothing more than political dictatorships. Look who runs them, corrupt eliete priest-hoods. They even used to call themselves ‘princes’ and they deck themselves out as kings by conning money off the poor.
There is no information availiable that illustrates what Gog and Magog represent, other than they are two large opposing forces. Bush was also a target on 9/11. The airplane he should have been in would have collided with the plane that was shot down, said to have crashed because the passangers had a go. Bush remained at the school he was visiting, way past his scheduled time to leave. I guess the Gog he is refering to owned his arse by sponsoring him into office. But Bush was always a ‘ne’er do well Jack the twat’ and probably pissed them off.