| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
Are We REALLY Living In “THE END”? These Startling Developments May Shock You! (Just Released Video)
.jpg)
The below video is absolutely phenomenal! I urge you to watch and to share!
What do the majority of people think about biblical events, such as the flood and current events? You’ll be surprised to hear what they say, and even more surprised by the comments and questions the video host, Ray, poses. He even leaves a disbelieving scientist speechless to the point the man becomes angry. This video is a must-see, and well worth sharing.
YouTube Commentary: In the time of Noah, people were going about their daily lives, not mindful of the impending destruction. Like them, are we ignoring warnings of God’s coming judgment? The Bible gives us clear signs of the last days. Did you know the Scriptures say we will see:
• Flippant use of God’s name
• Money-hungry preachers and rampant hypocrisy in the church
• Wars and rumors of wars
• Denial of a global flood
But surely no educated person could believe that Noah and his ark ever really existed. Wouldn’t it be impossible to fit millions of species of animals into one boat? And what evidence is there (if any) for a worldwide catastrophic flood? However…what if it did all happen exactly as the Bible says? What would that mean? Who was Noah, and why is the amazing account of his life so relevant to you in the 21st century? Don’t be caught unaware. Time may be very short. Will you be ready?
Spiritual Constipation Requires Spiritual Ex-Lax. Get Some Today While Supplies Last!
Time wasted by watching the video–that is, ENTERTAINING oneself–would be better spent in simply reading Chapter 11, verse 40-45 of the Book of Daniel; in which the “king of the South” is the United States and its allies and the “king of the North” is Russia and its allies…
And in understanding that the Hebrew verb root used in Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel is the same Hebrew verb root used in Chapter 26, verse 19 of the Book of Isaiah which is a figurative description of the revelation of the memories of previous lives.
It is the fulfillment of these SPECIFIC Prophecies which are typically IGNORED by the Christian ‘Armageddon theologians’ because they have NO Knowledge as to what they mean.
Michael
You lost me there Bro…..what are you trying to say??
Stealth,
Read the 1st verse of Chapter 12 of Daniel. The word translated there as “stand up” should, instead, be translated as “arise”.
That “arise” is to be associated not with the Pharisaical interpretation of the Doctrine of “the resurrection”, but with the *Revelation* of “the resurrection”; of which, Chapter 19, verse 26 of the Book of Isaiah, using the same Hebrew verb root, is a description of the revelation of the memories of previous lives.
So, the Michael of Chapter 12, verse 1 of the Book of Daniel is someone who has “arisen”, by which is meant “raised from the dead”, which is not identical but similar to the Buddhist Doctrine of ‘Rebirth’.
What can be questioned is WHO is ‘raised from the dead’ and given the name of Michael.
But it is clear from the context that he is NOT an angel, but a PERSON.
Michael
April 15 beginning of the Blood Moons
/space/2014/01/january-2014-breaking-news-four-blood-moons-april-2014-20-2474800.html
“You lost me there Bro…..what are you trying to say??”
He’s trying to say Jesus wasn’t resurrected and he denies the atonement of sins by Christ. In other words, he preaches a false gospel message.
8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.
—Galatians 1:8-9
where is God. Why has He not spoke in 3000 years.
tchris12
God does not deal with us the same as he did the Old Testament world. The Old Testament world still had to live by faith, but there faith was in a comming Messiah. There sins had not been paid for at that time. Even after all the things that God did right before there eyes, they sill chose to disobey God. That is why they had to continually do sacrifices as a symbol to them/us that innocent blood had to be shed for attonement of sins. Our faith is in Jesus Christ, the Messiah that came and lived a sinless life. He gave his life as a ransom for our sins. If God were to appear or speek with a booming voice from a mountain as he did with the B.C. crowd and you or i were to wilfully break God’s law as Adom and Eve did….its over for us…Because Jesus is not going to come back and die again for your sins. You would be as satan is and be damned.
Check out the full text (relating to the investigation) of what Doug Hagmann said in the video.
This is big, this is earth-shattering.
This is the Apocalypse and Obama’s the Antichrist.
I’m the Messenger but the reluctant messenger because I’m Buddhist (that’s highest form of culture in the world) and reveal the Christian Apocalypse against my will.
Google
Full Transcript: Arpaio Facts Revealed – Video – Former Intelligence Analyst Working With Arpaio, Spills It All. This Is The Apocalypse. Obama’s The Antichrist.
Google
Earth-Shaking Revelations, Bigger Than Watergate – Video – Obama Part Of Intelligence-Linked Cult. Arpaio Investigation-Linked Facts Revealed!
He who gets the gold wins and the Nazi’s are taking all the gold
http://one-vibration.com/profiles/blogs/karen-hudes-exposes-another-species-hiding-in-the-vatican-videos
BEST UPDATE EVER
You need to watch the video again. Your knowledge of the Bible must have come from a demon.
Too many negative votes, huh?
How ’bout this?
How can this person write a title including the term “the End” and NOT even MENTION the Prophecy in Chapter 11, verse 40 of the Book of Daniel, which says: “When the time comes for the End…”?
On her video, she talks about ‘listening to the Word of God’.
Is she even listening AT ALL to the Word of God?
Is not the Prophecy in Chapter 11, verse 40 of the Book of Daniel the Word of God?
Would it not be better for her to merely quote this Word of God rather than to go on and on and on and on about what HER ideas are about listening to the Word of God?
Just sayin’.
Michael
If no one has seen his other videos you guys definitely should.
the guy who does these videos is amazing.
Watch this one, its about God Vs Evolution and he shuts them down so bad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0u3-2CGOMQ
Thanks for the link! I loved it as he made those atheists squirm.
I’m sure Obama’s the Antichrist, Lyn Leahz agees with me on that.
The Apocalypse is now I think.
A new article is viral at BeofreItsNews which says all Antichrist-Obama’s secrets will be revealed shortly.
Google it
Finally Joe Arpaio Revelation Of Birth Certificate Breaking Now – Video – Spread this Worldwide Even To China NOW
The words that “will remain secret and sealed until the time of the End” have NOTHING to do with any purported ‘anti-Christ’, but pertain to the Doctrine of “the resurrection” (‘Rebirth’) and the Vision of the “Son of man” (referred to in the Thanksgiving Hymns of the Dead Sea Scrolls as the “Vision of Knowledge”, in Chapter 3, verse 24 of Genesis as the “Tree of Life”, and as the “sidrah tree” and the “Night Journey” in the Quran).
Michael
Obama’s the Antichrist. Beware of the false christs who will deny this.
Like Michael: he’s a false christ sent by Antichrist Obama to defend him.
Nice video.
I hope people watch it..
I don’t. I hope they do their own goddamn research and make up their own minds.
YT research–> Spoon feeding for babies from a complete stranger
I love it. Ms. Leahz says, “The Bible gives us clear signs of the last days.” To back up her claim, she uses 4 examples:
• Flippant use of God’s name
• Money-hungry preachers and rampant hypocrisy in the church
• Wars and rumors of wars
• Denial of a global flood
Unfortunately, she doesn’t supply the biblical passages to back up her claim. Indeed, with the exception of, “wars and rumors of wars” (found in Matthew 24:6, Mark 13:7, and Luke 21:9), I can’t think of any passages that fit the other assertions. The one about preachers and the church might point back to Revelation, but as for the other two, I’m stumped. Please, as a scholar, refresh my memory as to their location.
Apparently, Ms. Leahz would like us to believe that there have NEVER been cussing, wars, immorality in the Church or “denial” of biblical events in the entire history of the world UNTIL today. Her self-delusion knows no bounds.
Please, please, please, if you want to be the Good Shepherdess, do a little homework, Lyn. Okay, I’ll help you out – yet again.
Did you know that the Greek word “metanoeo,” translated as “repent” in the New Testament, has no direct English equivalent? It actually seems to more closely fit the mold of a Greek idiom, such as, “Bite your tongue” or “It’s all Greek to me.”
The verb “repent” means “to feel remorse or regret for past sins.” Unfortunately, that doesn’t fit the meaning of metanoeo. You see, that word comes from meta, which means “after,” and noia, which means “mind.” Therefore, it actually means “to have the after-mind.”
The Theological Lexicon of the New Testament (2:472) describes metanoeo as meaning “to change your mind,” “to change your plans,” or to form a new “thought or feeling after coming under the influence of deception.”
Consider that last part carefully. In fact, read it again: To form a new “thought or feeling after coming under the influence of deception.”
Clearly, the limitations of the English language have led to our understanding only half of the meaning of metanoeo. To seek the true essence of the word, we need to find an English idiom which fits the definition as described above. Can you think of one? How about, “Wake up and smell the coffee?” After all, it’s about opening your eyes to deception, is it not?
Therefore, boys and girls (and especially Ms. Leahz), all those places in the Bible that call for you to “repent” and feel remorse for your “sins” are actually telling you to “WAKE UP” to the deception around you and see that everything is a lie – especially what has been accepted as biblical “doctrine.”
Do not be frightened by Ms. Leahz’s “hard sell” tactics. Is that something a true representative of a loving god would NEED to do or is it a more appropriate tactic for Lucifer? Remember, true spiritual love is not something that can be acquired at the barrel of a gun.
Nice try ,but your bait and switch failed. You bait with a nice break down of the Greek word metanoeo, then switch over to your own translation of God’s word. Did you actually expect us to forget that many words have multiple meanings, and it would be wise to look at the context the word is used in to accurately define the word? Your disdain for repentance is clear but, do not twist God’s word to suit your own wicked heart! As for the old “hard sell” ploy, there is none being used here. Why do people like you always accuse us of “barrel of a gun” tactics for simply quoting scripture? Do not put my God in the ” love” box!! He is also a God of judgment ,wrath,mercy,jealousy. You don’t bring up the others because you don’t want to accept the fact that there are consequences for breaking God’s laws and,the only way out of this mess is the blood payment made by The Lord Jesus. As for the location of the verses I suggest you actually watch the video ,it’s all in there. Or I will post them if you wish??
Amen and Amen…the Lord bless you!
Ah, Stealth, your nom de plume evokes one who slips by under the radar and is hidden in our midst, waiting to attack – an apt description for the tactics of Lucifer. No matter. I enjoy a good debate.
While it is possible that words have multiple meanings, metanoeo, when broken down to its root components as I have done, makes any alternate interpretation futile. It literally means “to have the after mind.” However, in the interest of spirited discussion, I will acknowledge that MY interpretation could be in error. Nevertheless, you ignore the primary evidence used in my argument – the explanation as given in the Theological Lexicon of the New Testament – that metanoeo means “to form a new thought or feeling after coming under the influence of deception.” Are you prepared to argue with the scholars who penned that description?
I have no doubt that “your” god is one of murderous vengeance and not love, as was the creature playing god in the Old Testament. However, this is not God the Father referenced in the New Testament.
You seem to forget that we are all known by our actions, not our flowery words. Someone who claims to love you and then kills you is not exactly living up to his/her words. In the case of Christ, there was NEVER any indication of vengeance in his actions. He acted out of love and forgiveness and he specifically spoke out against judgment. Do you really expect me to believe that he will return to “judge” others when he specifically said he wouldn’t? That’s insane. He allegedly died for your sins – the debt, if there ever was one, is paid in full. Why, then, would he return in wrath and judgment? It is illogical. It’s something the Jews want you to believe because they reject Christ.
You have become so brainwashed by the deliberately confusing BS espoused in churches down through the centuries that you can no longer think critically. You cannot analyze what is in front of you, you can only take for granted what you are told.
Please explain how you can justify salivating over the murder of your fellow man just because you think that you believe in the “right” god? Christ, if he were here now, would be sickened and appalled at what is being done in his name.
All the pieces to the puzzle fit together nicely when you accept that the god of the Old Testament is Lucifer. Only then can you begin to understand the real story and its implications.
I do appreciate that you, at least, have the guts to debate me.
Mastersofthemirror ,
I am not sure what bible you are reading, but I must comment on your fallacious statement “the god of the Old Testament is Lucifer”
I submit to you John 8: 56 Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.
57 Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?
58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.
59 Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.
My query to you is , what was in that statement of Christ that would cause the Jews to attempt to stone him? Could it be that Christ was claiming to be the God of the Old Testament by using the title ” I Am”?
You sir, accused Leahz of “Unfortunately, she doesn’t supply the biblical passages to back up her claim.” And you just did the same thing.
Stealth, as to your final question, you’ve got me there. I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Are you refering to biblical passages that prove the god of the Old Testament is Lucifer? If so, it’s much more involved than can be elucidated here. You are wanting your answers synopsized into small paragraphs for easy assimilation. Unfortunately, the real story is much more involved. It is in my book, if you care to read: http://www.mastersofthemirror.com.
As to your other query regarding “I AM,” you are making a tremendous leap if you wish to use that as your argument. I can easily take this to mean that he existed before Abraham. It doesn’t mean he was claiming to be “I AM.” Haven’t you ever misspoke? Could it also be that the Jews were expecting him to make some admission to being God and they jumped to the wrong conclusion to stone him?
Here’s the problem with your argument: In Matthew 22, the Jews try to entrap Christ regarding his views on whether to give tribute to Caesar. Jesus skillfully replied, “Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s.” So, if Jesus was skillful in avoiding that trap, why wouldn’t he have avoided the “I AM” trap?
mastersofthemirror said:
“Do you really expect me to believe that he will return to “judge” others when he specifically said he wouldn’t?”
To the contrary:
“And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.”
—Revelation 19:11
Your exegesis of metanoeo has to be suspect. You state that “meta” means “after”, whereas in this particular case it actually means “change”, as in the case of metamorphosis, to change shape, and metastasis, to change position. ( or spread to a different location, to use the strictly medical definition )
Thus metanoeo indicates “to change one’s mind”; which is the essential meaning behind the idea of repentance. To attempt to change this clear meaning to “to have the after mind” is at best wilfully obscurantist, as most sensible people will surely agree.
It should be kept in mind that many of these prepositions have multiple meanings, both in Latin and in Greek, so one should be careful of making categorical assertions as to their invariant meanings.
Your attempt to more clearly define metanoeo as “wake up and smell the coffee” is also suspect, as this idiom gives no indication of changing one’s mind. Had the individual previously been smelling hot chocolate, then maybe, but there is no indication of a previous erroneous sensory impression.
It may just be my paranoia, but why do you put the words “repent”, and “sins”, in inverted commas? Is it because you also believe that these words should have no part to play in scripture, when it is clear to the rest of us that they are intrinsic to that great work? Thus, are you disputing the fallen and sinful state of man? Certainly, your final two sentences seem to me at least to indicate a humanist interpretation of man’s situation.
Ah, MOTM. Your real form reveals itself to be that of a Luciferian, or a Satanist as we better know them. Perhaps there are many of you, legion indeed, as your nom de plume is in the plural. Seven devils possess you.
Clearly, such as you are incorrigible, so debate is not called for, but only rebuke, as Christ did not debate with satan.
But He did speak of vengeance, despite your upper-case denial of this fact.
“Depart from Me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels”. Matt 25:41.
HereAmI, why is it that anyone who exercises his mental faculties to ponder possibilities other than what he is told automatically labeled a Satanist? I have literally spent years in the search for meaning to the mystery of our tepid existence. I have even written two books on the subject. Can you say the same? Before you defame my actions or denigrate my beliefs, shouldn’t you obtain more information so that you could make an informed decision? I invite you to check out http://www.mastersofthemirror.com and read some of the free supplemental chapters.
As for your final point about vengeance, you are somewhat correct. However, if you note, Christ was referring to Lucifer and not your fellow man. Christ didn’t die for Lucifer – he died for us. Ergo, he will not come back here to murder “unbelievers,” no matter how much that bloodthirsty people like you wish it.
I found your post interesting. What would you suggest people do after they wake up? You mentioned that “everything” is a lie, and that deception is all around us. Could you define “everything” for me? Is deception within us also, or only all around us? How does one determine if deception is truly deception? Thanks for your time.
People, the central bankers of USA/UK want their power in an institution that is not answerable to any legislative, executive or judicial branch of any nation – the IMF. See IMF Articles of Agreement.
Obama & Cameron told the world leader hold-outs on allowing IMF to issue what would then be the new world reserve currency what will happen if they do not get their way, the O&C NYC dirty bomb exercise recently. Yeah, they will go there. And since USA/UK corporate-owned media is in the pocket of O&C, any nation(s) blamed as source of the db material, co-conspirators by O Admin, C Admin, will be backed up by the USA/UK mainstream press.
The common people of the nations face a world war, or, if the leaders agree on allowing IMF to issue the new world reserve currency, then USA, UK, and a lot of other nations will be declared bankrupt, the IMF comes in with their loans, state, federal owned property gets handed over to IMF in payment of IMF loans.
LEHAza has nothing constructive to offer people, she is evil, whoring onto Christ, but not being of Christ.
Malachia 4:5-6 I will send to you Elijah the prophet before THE dreadful day of the Lord
THERE IS ONLY ONE dreadful day of the Lord to come
GONE is repent or wrath, evildoers on earth when Christ returns will be scooped up by Christ’s angels and taken off the earth (Matthew 13:41). Christ said John the Baptist has taken over from the law and the prophets (Matthew 11:13).
John 12:47 IF ANY MAN HEARS MY WORDS AND DOES NOT WANT TO DO THEM, I DO NOT JUDGE HIM
Evil people, like Lezahe, claim to be of Christ but IGNORE CHRIST.
Rev. 22:11 Let him that is filthy be filthy still and let him that is unjust be unjust still
WHAT DO YOU PEOPLE DO NOT UNDERSTAND ABOUT THE FOREGOING, that you would continue to read the BS put out by the ‘repent or wrath’ crowd?
When the third Temple in Jerusalem is built, then it is not long before God’s begins his judgment unto victory (Matthew 24:15, Daniel 11:31, Rev. 6:9-11, Matthew 23:35). God’s coming judgment is REVENGE on the world for all the killing of God’s righteous people.
the THIRD temple came and went ……..
The BLOOD SPLATTERED ANIMAL SHOAH site has come and gone ……
Per Peloubet’s Bible Dictionary 1925
There (ALREADY) were THREE Temples in Jewish history:
FIRST Temple built by Solomon, for a little more then 400 years, from @ B.C. 1000 to B.C. 588. From Solomon to the Babylonian exile.
SECOND Temple Zereubbabel’s or the Temple of the Return, built with the aid of the Prophets Zechariah and Haggai, lasted nearly 500 years years, from it’s completion B.C. 515 to B.C. 20. We see by the description of Ezra 6:3 that this Temple was about one third larger then Solomon’s.
THIRD Temple Herod’s Temple lasting only @ 90 years from B.C. 20 to it’s destruction by Titus, August A.D. 70.
The whole area or platform was called the Temple. Solomon made it about 600 feet square, containing 12 acres. This area ,according to Josephus, was nearly doubled when Herod built the THIRD temple.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx
Actually, according to the ‘Jewish Encyclopedia’, Solomon built the 1st temple approximately 832 BCE, and stood per Rabbinic sources, for 410 years until 422-BCE. HOWEVER, their own records indicate that the 2nd Temple was built in 586 BCE (two temples stood simultaneously at one time, for 164-years?) Irony is doubled when you get the small nugget of truth that ‘there is actually no physical proof that the Solomon Temple ever existed other than the Hebrew books that form the earliest parts of the Christian Bible.
THEN, you have Herod tearing down the 2nd Temple and rebuilding the 3rd Temple in 19-BCE (18th year of his reign), and it stood until 70-CE. when the Romans destroyed it. Since Herod TORE IT DOWN TO THE LAST BRICK, EXPANDED THE COURTYARD, etc., this is NOT the 2nd Temple (redux) but is, in fact, THE 3RD TEMPLE.
Hate to break it to all the Christians, but that 3rd Temple you keep waiting on being built, that will indicate the end of time – yeah, IT WAS BUILT AND THEN DESTROYED OVER 1950-years ago!!!
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
King Herod the Great spent 30 years refurbishing Zorobabel’s temple (the second temple) just in time for the coming of Christ, who not only prophesied that the temple would be destroyed — which is was in 70 A.D. by the 21-year-old Roman general Titus (son of Vespasian), but Christ also condemned all further Hebrew temple worship forever.
Therefore, the temple mount (Mt. Moriah in Jerusalem) is not the holiest place on the globe.
‘Jewish Encyclopedia’, Solomon built the 1st temple approximately 832 BCE, 2nd Temple was built in 586 BCE. THEN, you have Herod tearing down the 2nd Temple and rebuilding the 3rd Temple in 19-BCE (18th year of his reign), and it stood until 70-CE. when the Romans destroyed it. Since Herod TORE IT DOWN TO THE LAST BRICK, EXPANDED THE COURTYARD, etc., this is NOT the 2nd Temple (redux) but is, in fact, THE 3RD TEMPLE.
Hate to break it to all the Christians, but that 3rd Temple you keep waiting on being built, that will indicate the end of time – yeah, IT WAS BUILT AND THEN DESTROYED OVER 1950-years ago
“The BLOOD SPLATTERED ANIMAL SHOAH site has come and gone”, his description for what Christ calls the House of Prayer:
Matthew 21:13 … MY HOUSE SHALL BE CALLED THE HOUSE OF PRAYER
The cattle on a thousand hills belong to the Lord, and mankind is permitted to eat animals, fish and fowl (with Jews restricted in the foregoing, for example Deut. 14:21, whereas Gentiles are not restricted in the foregoing). Asians would starve if they only ate Kosher foods, but God does not command Gentiles to follow the dietary rules he gave to Jews.
The first Temple was built by King Solomon
The second Temple was built, and dedicated by then Jewish governor Zerubbabel. Cyrus the Great permitted the Jews to rebuild their Temple.
Governor Herod had the second Temple rennovated. The second Temple was destroyed in 70 A.D.
Christ says there will be a third Temple. That great city, the whore mystery Babylon, whose owners are Jew Pharisees, want a third Temple, as do Jews of the Lord.
The third Temple will be the Lord’s Temple (Matthew 24:15, Daniel 11:31, Rev. 11:1).
When the third Temple is built, it is not long thereafter that God’s dreadful day begins (Matthew 24:15, Daniel 11:31, Rev. 6:12-17).
600 x 600 = 360,000 sf, an acre is 43560 so divide 360000 by 43560 and you 8.2644628 acres. Re-check your figures.
CC
Alright, I am still having problems. If the Jewish Encyclopedia says that the first temple was built in 832 and stood for 410 years I get that. That puts us at 422 BC. Then you state that the 2nd temple, which comes after the first, was built in 586 BC. Do you see a problem here? How can it be rebuilt if it is still standing? Perhaps your encyclopedia is not empirical after all. Stop and think about what you are spewing. I’m a farmer and I recognize it because it comes from the south end of a north bound cow or horse. Just one is lumpier than the other. Next time, work out your math and then try to disprove something.
Have a nice day.
CC
Anonymouse,
here is another thought. Please show me the writings that confirm that Khufu was ever built, that Teotihuacan was ever built, that Machu Pichu was ever built and hey, let’s not forget the Medicine Wheel was ever built. What? None? So therefore they do not exist. There is no written proof that the Sphynx was ever built either but I have seen the pyramids, the Sphynx and, oh, wait a minute, I have also seen Knossos Palace and the underwater streets of Chersonnosis and many other “non documented buildings” throughout the world but I have seen them, touched them and marveled at them but since we have no written proof that they exist therefore they don’t Correct? What about all those strange jars in the Plain of Jars Laos? What about Angora Wat? Hey! What about the Nazca Plains? By your undeniable logic, they do not exist. Period. Thank you professor. Also, please check your math on the size of the temple mount and do I believe another temple will be built? NO! You need to understand what the term Abomination of Desolation means.
Good luck and God bless and don’t forget to work on that math.
CC
The “rapture” Prophets for PROFIT are ANTI-Christ DEATH CULTISTS. God/Jesus put you in this LIFE to learn “soul lessons”, to increase your consciousness to the point of Redemption. Hagee and his Ilk REJECT the LIFE God gave you, and dangle a “shortcut” in front of people, just as SATAN dangled Temptation in front of Jesus. Do not follow the ANTI-Christ lies of FALSE prophets. Their “shortcut” of cheating God’s lessons does NOT lead to Heaven, any more than cheating on school work teaches you the subject. Hagee, Robertson, the whole group, do NOT believe in anything except the MONEY they collect for leading their Flocks astray.
“rapture” is actually a vicarious form of SUICIDE. “rapture” is an extremely SELF-ABSORBED way of saying “I am SO perfect” and anyone I dislike will be LEFT BEHIND to suffer(feel bad because I am gone) but I will revel in heaven.
I am sure you are right about the venal preachers you mention; I have never seen them or heard them preach, so I don’t know, but I suspect that you are correct.
But “God/Jesus” did not put us in this life to learn soul lessons. Now it is you who are spewing forth the spirit of antichrist. You seem to be espousing the doctrines of devils. You seem to be suggesting that we are here to learn through “karma”, until we become as gods, and transcend our fallen state.
No. We are redeemed by the precious blood of the Son of God, not by our own futile efforts to become better individuals.
I am finding it extremely difficult to understand what you mean by “vicarious suicide”. This, logically, is an impossibility.
No Christian considers himself to be “so perfect”. As Paul said of himself, “I am of all men most wretched”, and “the chief of sinners”. If we are raptured, as scripture states that we shall be, it is not because we are better, or more deserving of salvation than others are, for “there is none good, no, not one”; it is because we have been awoken to our desperate need for salvation through the entirely-undeserved and sovereign grace of God.
You may join us in the eternal joy which all are promised; but you must first seek His face, and ask for His forgiveness for your sins.
“My kingdom IS NOT of THIS WORLD” …..
The three MAGI (wise men of ZOROASTARIANISM) brought gifts of GOLD, FRANKINCENSE, and MYRRH to Baby Jesus. Do you think they came all that way, dropped off their VALUABLE gifts, and left?! NO! they stayed and imparted their beliefs. Then, when Jesus was 12, he used those gifts to pay his expenses to travel to INDIA and complete his studies of YOGA/HINDUISM nand He became an “Enlightened Master” (He achieved CHRIST CONSCIOUSNESS) THEN, when He was 32/33 He returned to Palestine to spread what He had learned IN INDIA.
Search (Jesus in India) and (Christ Consciousness).
HIS KINGDOM is not of THIS Earth …… HIS kingdom is the UNIVERSAL CONSCIOUSNESS.
THIS is why the Priests HAD to kill Jesus …. he was preaching LOVE, UNIVERSAL brotherhood, FORGIVENESS …… Those concepts are DEADLY to a Tribe that bases It’s existence on HATE and VENGEANCE, that follows a WAR god.
Jesus would have “infected” and weakened/destroyed judaism ….. JUST like having a member of the KKK start preaching brotherhood to the other members …… he HAS to go.
of this whole long diutribe this hits it on head, stated simply and perfectly. the end
YAWN! It’s been the end times since 1960 or when there is a President in office that you don’t like.
Lyn, thank you so much for posting this video! I love Ray Comfort and I am so glad he made this video to be released before the upcoming Hollywood version of Noah’s Ark. I truly felt the presence of the Holy Spirit in this, and it makes me want to shout from the rooftops that Jesus’ coming is near, even at the doors.
I also want to apologize for the people that make comments to you that are bereft of common courtesy and manners. Pay them no mind and keep posting articles and videos that are pleasing to the Lord, and proclaiming the coming of our great God and Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ. May you be richly rewarded in this life and in the life to come.
The Lord bless and keep you.
I am sure Lyn does her best, but it is certainly NOT “pleasing to the Lord” when she “favourites”videos which celebrate the murderous swine of the IDF as they go into Gaza fully armed and shoot children in the back as part of their satanic plan to murder the goyim.
She presumably suffers from that vilest of contagions, the adulation of the very people who horribly murdered the very One whom she claims to be her Lord and Saviour.
“Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgement.”
Blowjes , I often wonder how different this world would be if people would stop asking God to damn everything.
The name of Jesus may be “meaningless exclamations” to you but, to some of us that name is very precious and is above every other name. You will kneel before that name and confess that He is Lord one day. Believe it or not. As for the third commandment , Exodus 20:7 “Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.” The word is “in vain” 1 : to no end : without success or result 2 : in an irreverent or manner <you shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain. So you are wrong he is not just "patronizing and manipulating " them…. He is pointing out there breaking of Gods law.
Huh? Old testament now? JFC, are we Jewish or Christian? I am confused.
Jesus was neither. Neither Judaism or Christianity existed when Jesus was alive.
Jesus was neither. Neither Judaism or Christianity existed when Jesus was alive.
Come on guys think about it. If Judaism was not created until after 70 CE by the Pharisees, how can Jesus be Jewish?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharisees
“The Pharisees were at various times a political party, a social movement, and a school of thought in the Holy Land during the Second Temple period, beginning under the Hasmonean dynasty (140–37 BCE) in the wake of the Maccabean Revolt. After the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE, Pharisaic beliefs became the liturgical and ritualistic basis for Rabbinic Judaism (commonly known as simply Judaism).”
@PIX
These people can’t think rationally they’re indoctrinated.
From out there! As I showed above, Pix doesn’t know anything about the subject. Pix didn’t know what CENTURY Jesus lived in. Pix thought Julius Caesar was a Roman emperor. Pix thought “meri” was an Egyptian name. Pix thought Caesarion was crucified. Pix thought Christian titles applied to Egyptian kings.
And in the paragraph you’re commenting on is an example. Pix quotes Wikipedia as saying that the liturgy and rituals of the Pharisees became the basis for rabbinic Judaism, after 70 A.D. And Pix somehow MISUNDERSTANDS that to mean that the rituals and liturgy didn’t exist BEFORE 70 A.D..
It is tedious to point out a list of errors of fact, and I’m done.
Seriously?LOL!!!! Many researchers are coming to find that the Bible Jesus didn’t even exist!! The closest entity to be compared to Jesus was Apollonius of Tyana.
Truthseeker007, you don’t know what you are talking about. Apollonius of Tyana was a philosopher after the time of Jesus.
Apollonius of Tyana taught that God was not interested in the prayers of humans.
And more than a century after his death, Apollonius of Tyana’s story was re-written to make him a Jesus-like miracle worker.
Look it up. Born maybe 15 A.D. Jesus died around 35-36 A.D. Apollonius died around 100 A.D. and the book that made Apollonius a miracle worker — a deliberate attempt to copy the story of Jesus — was 120 years or more AFTER the death of Apollonius.
I did explain all this to you once before and you didn’t read it. You seem doomed to never learn anything.
No I’m sorry your wrong but the Bible Jesus didn’t actually exist.Sorry bub.He was created by combining many saviors and gods and myths. Apollonius is just the tip of the iceberg.
Apollonius of Tyana (Ancient Greek: Ἀπολλώνιος ὁ Τυανεύς; c. 15 – c. 100 CE[2]) was a Greek Neopythagorean philosopher from the town of Tyana in the Roman province of Cappadocia in Asia Minor. Little is known about him with certainty. Being a 1st-century orator and philosopher around the time of Christ, he was compared with Jesus of Nazareth by Christians in the 4th century[3] and by various popular writers in modern times.
Biblical scholar Bart D. Ehrman, a critic of the Christ myth theory, relates that in the introduction to his textbook on the New Testament, he describes an important figure from the first century without first revealing he is writing about Apollonius of Tyrana:
Even before he was born, it was known that he would be someone special. A supernatural being informed mother the child she was to conceive would not be a mere mortal but would be divine. He was born miraculously, and he became an unusually precocious young man. As an adult he left home and went on an itinerant preaching ministry, urging his listeners to live, not the material things of this world, but for what is spiritual. He gathered a number of disciples around him, who became convinced that his teachings were divinely inspired, in no small part because he himself was divine. He proved it to them by doing many miracles, healing the sick, casting out demons, and raising the dead. But at the end of his life he roused opposition, and his enemies delivered him over to the Roman authorities for judgment. Still, after he left this world, he returned to meet his followers in order to convince them that he was not really dead but lived on in the heavenly realm. Later some of his followers wrote books about him.[18]
Ehrman goes on to explain that Apollonius was a real person and that his followers believed Jesus to be a fraud.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollonius_of_Tyana
Our Saviour cannot be mistaken for any other. He performed countless miracles on earth, miracles well attested to by bystanders. He healed the sick and the crippled, restored sight to the blind, cast out demons, and even raised the dead! His birth was of a virgin, foretold by an angel. While still a child, he exhibited extraordinary knowledge of religious scripture. He reformed the corrupt and worldly religions of his day. He was crucified, rose from the tomb and appeared to his disciples to prove to them his power over death, after which he ascended to Heaven to sit at the right hand of the Father. He was known as “the Son of God!” His message is of love and compassion.
We give you: Apollonius of Tyana*
http://www.bandoli.no/historicalrecords.htm
As soon as Jesus was put in the place of Apollonius, the task of the Roman churchmen was TO DESTROY ALL RECORDS concerning Apollonius and his Essenian Early Christian followers during the first three centuries, so that the world might forever be kept in darkness concerning this COLLOSAL DECEPTION, and be made to believe that Jesus and the Christian religion, which they originated at the BEGINNING OF THE FOURTH CENTURY A.D., antedated their creation by three centuries. It was for this reason that the Alexandrian and other ancient libraries were burnt, so that all books written during and pertaining to the FIRST THREE CENTURIES OF OUR ERA MIGHT BE DESTROYED.
And so well did the churchmen succeed in obliterating such records, that, for nearly two thousand years, the world has been kept in darkness concerning the fact that Apollonius of Tyana was the recognized world teacher of the first century, and that during the first three centuries, before he was created at the Council of Nicea, as an alternative messiah to Apollonius, no such man as Jesus Christ was known to or mentioned by ANYONE.
Apollonius the Nazarene
Part 1:
The Historical Apollonius Versus the Mythical Jesus
By: Dr. R. W. Bernard, B.A., M.A., Ph.D.
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/apollonius.htm
Basically what happened was that the Catholic church created a composite character, because at the time they were expending a lot of resources putting out religious wars. It seemed like a good idea at the time, but like many things it got perverted. Yeshua Ben Joseph, was a Jewish rabbi who lived from 70BC to 9 BC. He was apparently crucified at some point, charged with being a thief.
Prior to that there was a man by the name of Rabbi Hallel who apparently died in 100BC. Rabbi Hallel was called “The Great Teacher”. Many Christians are led to believe that a man named Jesus was called this, when in fact it was Rabbi Hallel. Now, what happened was that the New Testament composite character of “Jesus The Christ” was created by the Council of Nicea.
Most of the words that are attributed to this composite character, referred to colloquially as “Jesus”, were in fact spoken by Apollonius of Tyana, who the Bible calls “Paul of Tarsus”. Because Rome had their armies scattered all over the place and all these wars were over the subject of religion, what the Council of Nicea decided to do is essentially create a “State Religion”.
So, what they did was combine the religions of the east and the west, both of which were concerned with Sun worship. Those in the West worshipped Hesos, also called Hess. Those in the East that worshipped the Sun worshipped Krishna, which in Greek is called Kristos. The very first “Bible” that was put together in 325AD.
They took some books that Apollonius of Tyana had brought back from Burma, called the Codes of the Initiates (which concerned themselves with man’s relationship to the seasons, among other things) containing lessons that were handed down to those particular Holy Men in India during that particular period in history. The Codes of the Initiates allegedly contained words that were spoken by Krishna. The very first “Bible” was called the Helios Biblios, which means “The Sun Book”. This is what they did in the very beginning.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/andromeda/esp_andromedacom_7c.htm
Apollonius of Tyana is the one people speak of when they speak of Jesus. The name “Jesus” was added later and applied to the story that was created for the New Testament. Apollonius was the one who was essentially the character, the real-life character. The New Testament story was based on the story of Apollonius.
http://home.iae.nl/users/lightnet/creator/symbols.htm
Truthseeker007 you’re not getting the chronology right.
Jesus’ organization had started churches around the known world, Peter had written his letters, Paul had written his letters, several Roman historians had written of the Christians – BEFORE Apollonius of Tyana was changed from a philosopher to a Christ-like miracle worker.
That book was written 120 years or more after the death of Apollonius, and that is more than 180 years after the death of Jesus.
Again, Paul and his associate Luke knew the family and close associates of Jesus personally.
Peter knew Jesus personally. These men left writings that survive.
And in 1953 — early 1950s anyway — the ossuaries of Peter and other associates of Jesus named in the Gospels were found in Jerusalem.
And again, these ossuaries were found by Roman Catholics, and Peter being dead in Jerusalem contradicts the tradition of the Church, so you know the archaeology was honest. It’s why you don’t hear much about it. Peter didn’t go to Rome. Didn’t suffer martyrdom there. Says archaeology.
The Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles pre-date Apollonius’ biography by more than a century. The letters of Paul and Peter and the references to Jesus by Josephus predate
Apollonius’ biography by more than a century.
There is no danger of the world ending, there is no guarantee that man will not finish himself off however. Anyone who has read the ancient translations of the cuneiform tablets, it spells out Unaptshin took genetic samples on the ark, (there was no Noah mentioned) something modern man this day would be capable of and not animals. That is a kindgergarten story.
http://dublinsmickdotcom.wordpress.com/2013/10/07/shawnee-chief-tecumseh-predicted-the-new-madrid-earthquake-and-harrison-would-die-in-office-as-well-as-many-other-american-presidents-elected-in-a-zero-year/
http://www.seri-worldwide.org/id435.html
http://dublinsmick.wordpress.com/2014/02/22/dna-evidence-for-atlantis-edgar-cayce-right-again/
http://www.ratical.org/many_worlds/6Nations/6nations1.html#part1a
The story of Noah is taken from the Vedas when Manu saved the world from the flood two billion years ago.
Lyn would you like to read the real story of Noah?
http://dublinsmick.wordpress.com/2012/05/03/antarctic-ice-cap-melting-from-within-history-a-vast-early-warning-system-ever-heard-of-a-guy-named-noah/?relatedposts_hit=1&relatedposts_origin=520&relatedposts_position=0
The Bible Jesus didn’t exist very easy chronology.
Hello Truthseeker007 (LOVE your internet name). I would recommend all open-minded truth-seekers view 1) the Youtube clip “Jesus in Genesis: 1. The First Word of the Bible” by John Kostik showing that, by breaking down a word into its individual Hebrew letters and the symbolic images associated with them, further meanings are revealed. For example, “In the beginning” becomes “Son of God is destroyed by His Own Hand on the Cross” and 2) the Youtube clip, dated 8th March 2014, “Shroud of Turin Paperback rated no 1 out of 1,047 on Amazon”, by GoodShepard007.
I had a few months ago left Christianity because I could not reconcile contradictions in Bible, Science, certain moral teachings, early Christian blatant forgeries, ancient alien art and artefacts, ancient astronauts, historical reality of Jesus, among other reasons. I started thinking again when reading about the RIFD chips proposed which sounds ominously as foreshadowing the Mark of the Beast, in forehead or hand, without which it would be impossible to buy or sell, in Book of Revelation. Eventually, our DNA itself will be modified – so losing the “image of God”. In the last weeks, moreover, thanks largely to the internet, a gift from on High, I have discovered hidden codes in the Bible, of general and scientific interest and have spent days researching the Shroud of Turin, including original scientific research in Italian, showing that the chance that this is NOT Jesus Christ is 1 in 282 billion ! His Blood is clearly distinguished between that split while living and post-mortem. The Light and great force radiated from within His Body and is not on the electro-magnetic spectrum. His Chromosomes are in accordance with a Virgin Birth. A second Face has been found showing the damaged eye now open and well as in the Resurrection. Many, many other relevant, fascinating and scientific facts. He is the Truth, the Way and the Life. Forget New Age, mediaeval manuscripts or Eastern notions that He never died on the Cross. Forget ETs lifting Him. Forget alleged similarity with other “Crucified Saviours” and astrotheology. Scrap any notion that He is a myth. His Radiance came from within ! Worry not about whether you understand the Scriptures to any level or even agree with Christians on all matters. Trust in Jesus Christ alone ! Truly fully God and fully man. Thank God that He has given us, as the clip so simply and eloquently puts it, His Calling-Card ! Even His Gospel is in the stars – look it up – and on the Earth’s landscapes and artifacts (See Youtube channel “The Groxt1″ ). May this truth flood the earth. Best wishes to all and God bless.
Thanks but no thanks Marian Keady. I have been there and done that.
You are misquoting me.
Julius Caesar was awarded ‘Protector of Rome’ by the Senate for his extended and repeated defence of Rome. He was acting Emperor as per a temporary war commander would take over. His adopted son Octavian/Augustus was the first hereditary Emperor. Especially after he crucified Caesars only begotten son.
Your points would be better presented without the misquotes and petty insults.
Lifels
“And Pix somehow MISUNDERSTANDS that to mean that the rituals and liturgy didn’t exist BEFORE 70 A.D..”
The Pharisees were a political group into debt enslavement that began life between 140 BCE to 37 BCE. So no, their rituals and liturgy is not ancient, not religious and not based on tradition.
Judaism was invented AFTER 70 CE from Pharisaic teaching, not from Israelite teachings.
How can Jesus be Jewish when it was invented after his death?
How can Jesus be Jewish when he was an anti Pharisees Israelite, calling them hypocrites?
But by all means carry on believing the unsubstantiated word of a dark age invented thought and belief intolerant dictatorship based on debt enslavement. What ever yanks your chain mate, some people are into slavery as the property of another.
From out there!
@PIX
“These people can’t think rationally they’re indoctrinated.”
Agreed. They are indoctrinated but don’t give them excuses for their being bloody minded about it. There is no hope for people determined to believe the unsubstantiated word of dark age political thought and belief intolerant dictatorships. They are making themselves a part of the problem rather than the solution. Those people are posting their ‘religious’ articles in the Spirituality section to pee all over it and other peoples beliefs, not because they are spiritual.
Jesus was neither. Neither Judaism or Christianity existed when Jesus was alive.
Judaism did not exist until AFTER 70 CE.
How can Jesus be Jewish when Judaism did exist until after he had died?
Jesus was neither. Neither Judaism or Christianity existed when Jesus was alive.
Bingo Pix!
http://dublinsmick.wordpress.com/2014/03/11/the-migration-of-the-khazar-jews-into-japan-where-judaism-morphed-into-shinto-and-the-lost-city-of-mu/
http://dublinsmick.wordpress.com/2014/02/22/dna-evidence-for-atlantis-edgar-cayce-right-again/
Thanks for that, interesting. I’m not an expert on Japanese beliefs, just the history basics. It’s amazing how similar some of these beliefs are to each other. The Jews in Palestine now, are all Europeans and from Russia/Asia. The Israelites were Egyptian polytheists. Judaism is based on the political party beliefs invented by the banker money lenders, the Pharisees.
In Rome they were called the Patricians, a wealthy class who manipulated politics to line their own pockets, wage wars to loot other countries and keep power away from the poor, the sick and minorities. They destroyed Rome’s republic from within.
After manipulating Rome into wiping the Israelites off the face of Earth in 70 CE, the Pharisees became Judaism. Judaism is a political dictatorship based on debt enslavement, not a religion.
It’s all about politics and rival thought and belief intolerant dictatorships. We need a republic democracy, not more dictatorships. Jesus regardless if he lived or not, gave us the only solution to dictatorships… Democracy. Do no let your left hand know what your right hand is doing = unorganised, a leaderless society. He overturned the Pharisees bankers money lending tables, preached to meet in fellowship anywhere, pull up a log or a rock = a church. He was an anarchist a democrat, which aptly describes paganism with it’s all inclusive and tolerant beliefs. Organised religions are political dictatorships.
Dictators will always vilify their competition as evil, which is why all dictatorships/hierarchies vilify anarchies, the opposite and only solution.
When the Christians claim Jesus will return and rule for a thousand years, I automatically think democracy at last.
They think it’s to do with spirituality. The Rapture, where they are literally floated up into the sky to meet Jesus in the clouds, is actually talking about the ecstatic empowering idea of self rule that needs to be met halfway in the doing, ie by becoming politically proactive.. you can move mountains if only you had faith… in yourself and in our powerful joint voices.
The sky is an allegory for the mind, ideas, and rapture means ecstasy. 99% of our problems would vanish in the twinkling of an eye if we could only drop the limiting and disempowering belief we need governing by other self serving humans, that would include organised thought and belief intolerant religions. Jesus was totally against them.
PIX
You are a teacher?
Christ is returning bringing the government of God with Him to earth as its King. That is the Gospel, that is the Good News. The problems here on earth are all caused by government because Man is by nature, evil. When Christ returns He will rule with a rod of Iron. Democracy? not a chance!
Pix you will obey the 10 Commandments or else!
I’d be happy if Pix would learn something about a subject, before commenting on it.
Julius Caesar was not an emperor of Rome. Caesarion was not born in 30 BC,, he DIED in 30 BC — and not by crucifixion.
Augustus was the first emperor of Rome; they didn’t have one before.
Meri did not mean virgin, it meant “beloved,” and was applied to males and females and inanimate objects.
Jesus was not a Greek name. And Jesus wasn’t named that. He was named the Hebrew name we pronounce as Joshua or Yeshua, and the LATIN form of that is Jesus.
And Pix has not been misquoted by me. The words are still there, above.
Truthseeker cannot stop claiming that the 1st century accounts of Jesus are based on a 3rd century biography of a Greek philosopher. Josephus wrote in the 1st century. So did Peter. And Paul. And Luke, Paul’s associate. The Roman historians who wrote of Christians and Jesus did so a century before that biography of Apollonius.
It is just a statement of fact to point out that both of you are ignorant. And deluded.
/strange/2013/09/us-military-reptilian-symbolism-2451612.html
Thanx for this! Well worth the watch. My heart Swelled. Been awhile!
Thank you for sharing that.
There is always a possibility, probability or certainty that this world we know has been and will be destroyed and reborn…this can happen at any moment. The Earth is over 4 billion years old and we only have documented history that can be traced back 12,000 years? For the purpose of this thread, we have fables and fantasies that have no way to be verified concerning the voracity of the Bible.
Universal time is not bound to a 24 hour clock…12,000 years is a second in the Universe. You can not use Earthly time to measure the Universe. Wars, pestilence and the threat of flooding has existed for as long as this planet has had inhabitants. Even without wars the Earth was destroyed in the days of the dinosaurs; and it will be again, whether we want it to be or not.
The survivors will repopulate once again.
“The Earth is over 4 billion years old…”
Anyone who believes the earth is 4 billions years old has to believe some very foolish things. For example, how long do you believe soft tissue can remain intact after an animal dies? What if I told you that evolutionists believe that soft tissue from a dinosaur bone they dug up is 68 million years old? That’s right, I kid you not:
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur-shocker-115306469/?no-ist=
If you want to know what supposed 68 million year old soft tissue looks like, how it is flexible and pliable and returns to its original shape when stretched, you can see it at the 9:10 mark of this video from 60 Minutes:
http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/b-rex/
Isn’t it ironic that evolutionists make fun of the beliefs of Bible believers and yet, here is science making the ludicrous claim that 68 million year old soft tissue is flexible, resilient, and stretchy? One question I have is, when an evolutionist finds a dinosaur bone with soft tissue that is 68 million years old, do they straight away put it into a zip-lock plastic bag in order to prevent spoilage?
Another more important question is this: Why wouldn’t the dating calculations be questioned when someone says soft tissue from a dinosaur bone is 68 million years old? Here is why: Because a dinosaur bone that is not millions of years old would contradict the millions of years old paradigm of the evolutionary model and evolutionists won’t let that happen to their religion
. They’d rather look like fools claiming soft tissue is millions of years old rather than give up their ridiculous theories.
Lo and behold, the physical and scientific evidence for a young earth and the flood of Noah is overwhelming and the theory of evolution is utterly foolish. Here is a video that helps explain that:
“Scientific Age of the Young Earth – Dr. Don Patton”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1GJjHXX0Ic
Consider the foolishness evolutionists spew concerning the fossil record regarding the following examples:
At the 30:30 mark of the above video, you will see a beautifully formed Wolf Spider, a big hairy spider. If you saw a dead one of these in the forest or jungle, how long do you think the body of the spider would last? Well, if you believe the earth is billions of years old, you believe it lasts quite a while. The fossil of the spider mentioned appears in a national park at the Florissant Fossil Beds National Monument and a sign posted there states the sedimentary rock was laid down at a rate of 2 inches per one Million years. At that rate, it would take the sentiment to cover a human hair about 2,500 years. So for a large spider as this one, that would take hundreds of thousands of years. So is the body of a spider going to last hundreds of thousands of years in order to form a perfectly formed fossil? Ha! No, the fossil was formed rapidly, like in a catastrophic flood.
At the 32:32 mark of the video, you will see a perfectly formed fossil of a shrimp. Again, how long would the body of a shrimp last? Hundreds of thousands of years?
At the 33:49 mark of the video, you will see a fossil of a fish eating another smaller fish. And guess what? Evolutionists claim the fossil took 135 Million years to form? How foolish is that?
At the 34:34 mark of the video, perfectly formed fossil fern is shown. How long will a fern last before it wilts? You have to believe that a fern will stay beautifully formed for millions of years if you believe that the earth is billions of years old.
At the 36:58 mark of the video, there are fossils of jelly fish with even the mouth parts preserved. We’re talking a jelly fish here—how long will that last after it dies? According to evolutionists, millions of years.
At the 40:15 mark of the video, you will see Willo, a fossil of a dinosaur with the heart intact. Yes, the heart intact, fully visible. How does something like that stay intact millions of years before forming a rock? It doesn’t.
The fossil record didn’t happen over millions of years, it happened very quickly, in Noah’s flood. We’ve been lied to. The evidence is overwhelming that the earth is not billions of years old.
Consider the woman who carried her dead baby within her womb for 40 years. When it was finally removed after the 40 year carriage, it was completely calcified. Stone, if you will.
I am not agreeing nor am I disagreeing with your argument. I only bring this up to say that there are many mysteries. I dare not presume to have any definite answers, only many questions. And the more questions I ask, the more questions I have.
“I dare not presume to have any definite answers”
Well, one definite answer is “no” to the question of ‘Can soft tissue remain for 68 million years?’.
What are you trying to say in the first place?
Your comments are very confusing.
Just asking.
“What are you trying to say in the first place?”
What I am saying is if a Wolf Spider (which is quite large) died and is laying there on the ground, how long would the body remain intact? Would it get eaten? How long would it be before the body turns to mush and disintegrates into dust? 10 years? 100 years? Well, according to evolutionists, sedimentary soil built up around this dead spider at a rate of 2 inches per one million years. So let’s say for arguments sake that the Wolf Spider is 1 inch in height. So if the age of the earth claimed by evolutionists is true, then the body of that Wolf Spider would have had to remain intact, fully and beautifully formed, without disintegrating into dust, for 500,000 years before it turned into a fossil. Does that make sense? Or does it make more sense that the spider was covered up rapidly, like in a catastrophic flood. To see what the fossil looks like, you can find it at the 30:25 mark of this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1GJjHXX0Ic
So what I am saying it is foolish to believe this claim from the evolutionists as well as other claims, like soft tissue they found from a T-Rex bone is 68 million years old. The fossil record fits the evidence for the flood of Noah and does not fit the evidence for the earth being 4.5 billion years old.
Jyar Wrigglesworth,
You said:
“Why not marvel in the mystery?”
Because we are supposed to contend for the truth. If evolutionists are engaging in lies and propaganda for the sake of bamboozling everyone that the Bible is not true, then shouldn’t we expose that and show it for the folly it is?
You cannot prove or disprove these subjects. Carbon dating has been proven to be inaccurate. That has been our greatest mile stone.
Outside of that, the best that you can do is to remind them that you will be waiting for THEM to reveal ABSOLUTE truth.
Even then, the All Mighty can choose any path HE chooses to accomplish any end that HE chooses.
OUR job is to teach the gospel, teach his LOVE, Forgiveness, Faith, and spend our days monitoring our own thoughts and prayers for our enemies.
Christ has Already shed blood for their sins. That is not our job.
am123
“The Earth is over 4 billion years old…”
Anyone who believes the earth is 4 billions years old has to believe some very foolish things. For example, how long do you believe soft tissue can remain intact after an animal dies?”
The age of Earth is calculated by the age of the oldest rocks founds to date. If older rocks are discovered the date is adjusted. It is not dated on soft tissue of animals. Organic tissue can be preserved indefinitely in tar pits and certain other conditions it fossilises very quickly. There is a tree trunk for example, in Bryn Celli Ddu chambered mound that is a solid stone fossilised tree trunk with an axe mark on it’s surface, created when it was a tree.
The Earth is not 4 billion years old, it’s much older than that, it’s based on the oldest rocks discovered so far.
Jyar Wrigglesworth
“You cannot prove or disprove these subjects. Carbon dating has been proven to be inaccurate.”
That’s not true. Carbon dating is based on the decay rate of radiation that was assumed not to alter. A few years ago they found an anomaly where it decayed at a microscopically different rate. It is only objects within that same period that are affected where the date could be out by a microscopic amount.
You’ve thrown the baby out with the bathwater.
“The age of Earth is calculated by the age of the oldest rocks founds to date.”
They use circular reasoning and flawed methodologies to come up with their bogus dates.
“It is not dated on soft tissue of animals.”
They use meteorites to determine the age of the earth. Now that’s real science, using a rock that is not from this planet to date this planet.
And soft tissue, it last millions of years according to their calculations…..more real science
Pix- You said,”The Earth is not 4 billion years old, it’s much older than that, it’s based on the oldest rocks discovered so far.”
That being said, my question is, how did you calibrate your machine to find an accurate date, if you don’t already have an accurate START date?
The answer is, YOU CAN’T. It is an impossibility. Ask any truthful scientist.
Radio-carbon 14 dating is an estimate of the half life of an element. Also,
“this dating scheme is controversial because the dates derived are often wildly inconsistent. For example, “One part of Dima [a famous baby mammoth discovered in 1977] was 40,000 RCY [Radiocarbon Years], another was 26,000 RCY, and ‘wood found immediately around the carcass’ was 9,000-10,000 RCY.” (Walt Brown, In the Beginning, 2001, p. 176)
am123
“The age of Earth is calculated by the age of the oldest rocks founds to date.”
They use circular reasoning and flawed methodologies to come up with their bogus dates.”
That is exactly what you are doing. You have no evidence of your claims. You don’t understand the science because you have a bad case of blind eye, so claim to know more than the people who have studied the subject all their lives.
Earth is not the age of the oldest rocks found to date, it is much older. But because we have no evidence to state it as fact, it is based on the oldest known rock.
Either come up with some evidence to argue your point, or give it up and get over yourself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth
g.
“Either come up with some evidence to argue your point, or give it up and get over yourself.”
“Extraordinary Evidence that Dinosaurs Lived with Man – Dr. Don Patton (The Record of the Rocks)”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWe3cteDuBc
Have you ever heard of perma-frost?
Jyar Wrigglesworth I’ve heard of permafrost. It’s either underground or under ice. My question to you is, what changed the climate for the spider? From suitable to permanently frozen?
Since you have decided to join the conversation, I hope you took the time to read all of my above comments. Including the one that said, “I dare not presume to have all the answers, just many questions.”
In answer to Your question, I suppose the Almighty could cause the environmental change during the flood or with any other means that He chose.
Why do you choose to limit HIM, when HE has no limit? He created the Heavens and the earth. The earth is his foot stool. He has a sense of humor for the bible says, “HE winks.”
Maybe he left these little mysteries to surprise us, to fascinate us and to test our faith.
So, why should we find or have all the answers? Why not marvel in the mystery? Why not accept that we do not, cannot know.
He can create a puzzle to drive you insane if you let it. Or you can find the beauty and wonder within.
Here is a thought. Maybe the spider was flash-frozen first. A cataclysmic global environmental event. Maybe Super-volcano or massive asteroid.
But it’s not just the spider. That is just one example. There are millions of other examples. And evolutionists claim the fossils happened over hundreds of thousands of years.
And yes, there was a catastrophic event, the flood of Noah.
am123
Then go back to your science book and bible and dig for more answers if your faith is not enough.
My faith is not the problem. I totally believe the Bible. Evolutionists spread their propaganda and because of it, many today do not believe the Bible. And because of the lies about the earth being billions of years old, many have been bamboozled to believe the book of Genesis is a myth and none of the Bible is true, and so millions of people are lost as a result. That is the issue here. Believers have ceded this ground to the evolutionists with their propaganda and the truth is trampled over.
Prove it.
Prove what?
Prove evolution is a lie and the Bible is the Truth.
I’m not intentionally being provocative.
My point is that you are trying to make matters of Faith, matter of fact. It is not possible until Christ himself returns.
“Prove evolution is a lie and the Bible is the Truth.”
The Bible and the theory of evolution are both based on faith. Faith in the Bible can be proved true and faith in the theory of evolution can be proved folly.
If one seeks the God of the Bible and walks by faith, the Bible will prove itself to the seeker. But because God is invisible (except when He chooses to reveal Himself in the earthly realm), the physical proof of the Bible is not available to those who are “of this world”. The reason being is those who are “of this world” operate in a way that is diametrically opposed to the kingdom of God. The people “of this world” want to see first and then they’ll believe. In the kingdom of God, it is the exact opposite. Believe first and then you’ll see. And so that is the roadblock for the people “of this world” when it comes to proving the Bible. But for those willing to take the step of faith, the Bible can be proved.
The point of contact between God in heaven and men on earth is through a person’s spirit. But for those who are “of this world”, they are spiritually dead. So they cannot receive revelation from God, for the line of communication is not working. So when the people who are “of this world” try to understand the supernatural world, they are using only their natural minds and it makes no sense to them. They cannot see, nor can they hear. But once a person takes the step of faith and believes on Jesus, they become born again and their spirit comes alive and the line of communication between them and God starts working. So then God, who is Spirit, is able to communicate with that person’s spirit and gives revelation to that spirit. The spirit of such a man then is able to infuse the soul (mind+will+emotions) with the revelation it has received. Such a person is able to see God and hear from God because his spirit has been quickened and made alive in Christ. The kingdom of God belongs to such as these.
But for those who are “of this world”, they can look and look but never see. They can listen and listen but never hear. So unless they are willing to take the step of faith, the Bible cannot be proved to them, for the proof deals with an invisible God that must be sought out by faith.
However, when it comes to the theory of evolution, we are dealing strictly with the physical realm, things we can see. And so we can examine the physical evidence and the lack thereof and the faith that goes along with the theory of evolution. And when examined under the microscope of common sense and logic and science, that faith in the theory of evolution proves to be faith that is pure folly.
Faith is required for the theory of evolution because the fossil record lacks empirical evidence for it. For example, there is no physical evidence from the fossil record of anteaters with shorter and progressively longer snouts. The theory of evolution would have it that the anteater evolved its long snout gradually over millions of years. So at one point, according to the theory of evolution, there had to be an evolutionary ancestor to the modern anteater with a short snout, let’s say a 1 inch snout for arguments sake. And gradually over the years, there would have been an anteater with a 2 inch snout, an anteater with a 3 inch snout, and so forth up to the modern day anteater with its long snout. So does the fossil record shows such a progression? Nope.
Neither does the fossil record show a progression or sequence of giraffes with shorter and progressively longer necks.
Neither is there a sequence in the fossil record showing one species or kind of animal changing into another species or kind of animal. Darwin himself acknowledged that his theory implied that the number of transitional links between all species must be great in number. The excuse for the lack of transitional forms in the fossil record during Darwin’s time was that much of the fossil record was yet to be uncovered
. Well, since then we have uncovered quite a bit and no intermediate fossils have turned up in the fossil record.
What we do see in the fossil record are things which appear abruptly and fully formed. Let’s examine how the model of the theory of evolution fits the reality of the fossil record, shall we? And let us put aside for now the “Frankenstein type” story of how the first cell came to life by being zapped with electricity—it’s alive!—and just start with the infamous single cell starting point for evolution. The model of evolution would have it that from that one single cell evolved all the various life forms we see on earth today. So the model of evolution is basically a triangle. It starts at a single point on top and expands downward to a wide base on the bottom producing the various higher life forms we see on the planet today.
That model however, does not fit the fossil record. In the Cambrian explosion, we see a vast multitude of higher life forms appearing fully formed in the fossil record without any precursor forms, like the model of evolution requires. And the number of classifications, called phyla, that existed then is greater than the number of phyla on earth today. So while the theory of evolution requires things to start with one life form and expand ever-so gradually with the number of life forms increasing, what we actually see in the physical fossil record is a multitude and vast spectrum of life forms appearing fully formed without any precursors, as evolution would require.
Not only is the model of the theory of evolution a poor excuse to explain how the various life forms on the planet today came into being, but evolution requires humongous leaps of faith and is a downright silly theory that stretches the fabric of believability even beyond the outer most limits of absurdity!
Cases in point:
EXHIBIT A:
What if I told you that evolutionists believe that soft tissue from a dinosaur bone they dug up is 68 million years old? That’s right, I kid you not:
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur.html
If you want to know what supposed 68 million year old soft tissue looks like, how it is flexible and pliable and returns to its original shape when stretched, you can see it at the 9:10 mark of this video from 60 Minutes:
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5658449n&tag=contentMain;contentBody
Isn’t it ironic that evolutionists make fun of the beliefs of Bible believers and yet, here is science making the ludicrous claim that 68 million year old soft tissue is flexible, resilient, and stretchy?
One question I have is, when an evolutionist finds a dinosaur bone with soft tissue that is 68 million years old, do they straight away put it into a zip-lock plastic bag in order to prevent spoilage?
Another more important question is this: why wouldn’t the dating calculations be questioned when someone says soft tissue from a dinosaur bone is 68 million years old?
Here is why: Because a dinosaur bone that is not millions of years old would contradict the millions of years old paradigm that the evolutionary model requires and evolutionists won’t let that happen to their religion o no
! They’d rather look like fools claiming soft tissue is millions of years old rather than give up their ridiculous theories and admit the truth.
EXHIBIT B:
If one cell evolved into more complex organisms in primordial soup over millions of years and developed complex organs through random mutations—the engine of change for the theory of evolution—how then did male organisms evolve at the same time in parallel with female organisms with all their male and female organs intact, peaking at the right time after millions and millions of years of successfully evolving through the various forms of evolution (micro/macro/badda bing/badda boom) and culminate in an orgasmic explosion/breakthrough of life in the womb? Huh?
In other words, just how did we evolve from pond scum into human beings through random mutations? Mutations are more stuff from second-rate budget horror movies than they are agents of positive change. Random chance mutations do not produce increased information in the genome and higher organisms.
Here is how the Pope of evolution, the chief fool himself
, Richard Dawkins, explained this mystery of his religion whereby random mutations increase the genetic information:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaKryi3605g
Make sure you have your speakers turned up from the :10 mark to the :30 mark, you don’t want to miss his answer!
EXHIBIT C:
The theory of evolution is a theory that requires one to replace logic and common sense with folly. Consider the laughably absurd idea that natural selection and mutations—the engine of change for this ridiculous theory—can account for how speech came about.
Consider some of the components necessary for speech to take place. First, there is the FOXP2 gene. It’s not a stretch of the imagination to see how mutations can account for a FOXP2 gene popping up in a monkey at some point. However, consider the following other components necessary for speech:
“What makes humans different from all other animals? There are few better answers than the ability to produce and recognize speech. Speech is so much a part of being human that people with IQ scores as low as 50 or brains as small as 400 grams can fully comprehend and speak at a competent level [11]. The human head and brain are uniquely evolved to produce speech [4, 11]. Compared to other primates, humans have remarkably well-developed and controllable muscles around the lips and cheeks. Indeed, more of the motor cortex (particularly Broca’s area) is devoted to vocalization than any other function (see Figure 1) 1, in sharp contrast to every other animal, including primates. Only homo sapiens can use the tongue, cheeks, and lips, together with the teeth, to produce 14 phonemes per second [11]; even Neanderthal man could not sustain speech because of the structure of their breathing apparatus [4]. Humans are also exquisitely tuned for speech recognition. Infants as young as one day old show relatively greater left hemisphere electrical activity to speech sounds, and relatively greater right hemisphere activity to non-speech sounds”
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.93.6514
Here is where we are asked to suspend logic and common sense and accept folly. You have this mutated monkey-man with a useless FOXP2 gene in him. There would be no reason for natural selection to amplify or advance the FOXP2 gene in the species since the monkey with the FOXP2 gene could not communicate any more effectively with other monkeys than he could without the FOXP2 gene. So what happened, did the monkey with the useless FOXP2 gene but lacking the other components for speech suddenly mutate remarkably well-developed and controllable muscles around the lips and cheeks necessary for speech and also mutate his motor cortex (particularly Broca’s area) so it had speech functionality and so everything fell into place perfectly one fine day and the monkey-man-wannabe was then able to speak and said, “well I’ll be a monkey’s uncle”?
EXHIBIT D:
“Scientific Age of the Young Earth – Dr. Don Patton”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1GJjHXX0Ic
At the 30:25 mark of the above video, you will see a fossil of a beautifully formed Wolf Spider, a big hairy spider. Riddle me this if you will: what if you saw a dead one of these spiders in the forest or jungle, how long do you think the body of that spider would last laying there on the ground, with its body intact? Would it get eaten? How long would it be before the body turns to mush and disintegrates into dust? Ten years? A hundred years? Well, according to evolutionists, sedimentary rock slowly built up around this dead spider at a rate of 2 inches per one million years. So let’s say for arguments sake that the Wolf Spider is 1 inch in height. So if the age of the earth as claimed by evolutionists is true, then the body of that Wolf Spider would have had to remain intact—fully formed—without disintegrating into dust, for 500,000 years before it turned into a perfectly formed fossil. Does that make sense? At all? Absurd is it not? It is in fact beyond absurd. It is utter folly and foolishness to think that the body of a spider would not rot away for half a million years!
That is just the tip of an iceberg. At the 32:32 mark of the video, you will see a perfectly formed fossil of a shrimp. Hmmm, how long will a shrimp last after it dies? Long enough so that sedimentary rock gets formed over it at a rate of one inch every 500,000 years? And then at the 33:49 mark of the video, you will see a fossil of a fish eating another smaller fish. Did this snapshot in time get recorded in the fossil record over hundreds of thousands of years or rapidly, in an instant (think catastrophic flood)? At the 34:34 mark of the video, a perfectly formed fossil of a fern is shown. How long will a fern last before it wilts? Will it last hundreds of thousands of years after it dies without wilting so that sedimentary rock can build up around it at a rate of one inch every 500,000 years? To believe in evolution is to believe in some very foolish things indeed. At the 36:58 mark of the video, there are fossils of jelly fish with even the mouth parts preserved. We’re talking jelly fish here. Will their bodies remain intact for hundreds of thousands of years while rock slowly forms around them? The answer to that is “yes” according to evolutionists. ‘tis a silly theory indeed. At the 40:15 mark of the video, you will see Willo, a fossil of a dinosaur with the heart intact—yes, the heart intact! Fully visible. How does something like that stay intact millions of years before forming a rock? Answer: it doesn’t.
All in all, the theory of evolution is a theory lacking evidence and is full of fraud and folly. The fossil record doesn’t support it. And yet, our kids today in school are being indoctrinated and brainwashed with this nonsense. What the fossil record does support is like begets like, as the Book of Genesis tells us. The fossil record does not record things happening incredibly slowly over millions and billions of years, the fossil record records things happening quickly in a catastrophic event, in a “little” something
called the flood of Noah.
While the dating calculations of science are wrong and you shouldn’t hold your breath waiting for science to admit it, nevertheless, the theory of evolution is DOA in the halls of modern science, where this foolish and fraudulent theory of evolution is exposed by the wonders of nanotechnology and the complexities of the human cell. The theory of evolution will be relinquished to the dustbin of history, marginalized as the great farce that it is, perpetrated upon mankind, keeping parts of science in the dark ages, for about a century and a half now.
HERE IS THE BOTTOM LINE: If you want rock solid unchanging truth to stand upon and you want to know how everything came into existence, seek out the Word of God, which has withstood the test of time and will stand forever. Seek after Jesus (to see how read my profile) and the truth will set you free.
But if you want conjecture on where we came from along with fruitless and laughable theories, then seek out monkey-men-wannabes and they will spin you laughable yarns and fanciful tales!
You said, “The Bible and the theory of evolution are both based on faith. Faith in the Bible can be proved true and faith in the theory of evolution can be proved folly.”
On that statement, we agree perfectly. What we disagree on, is whether either can be proven to the others complete closed mouth satisfaction. My answer would be No.
God wants us to walk by faith. And you have not given any evidence in your comment that a college biology prof couldn’t argue differently.
I walk by faith. I don’t feel the need to beat a dead horse. Yours or anyone elses.
“Peace. Be still.”
am123
“Prove evolution is a lie and the Bible is the Truth.”
The Bible and the theory of evolution are both based on faith. Faith in the Bible can be proved true and faith in the theory of evolution can be proved folly.”
Evolution is observable fact, not based on faith. Evolution = change, that’s all it means. Everything changes over time. Fact, not faith.
The bible can easily be proven as a fiction. Judaism did not exist until after 70 CE. The Biblical Jesus was not Jewish.
Pix and am123
Why the incessant need to win? Why the need to be right? I say you are both right and both wrong.
Your both right to state your beliefs once. And both wrong to insist that the other is incorrect to the point of ridicule and anger.
am123
” And evolutionists claim the fossils happened over hundreds of thousands of years.”
Nope. Fossils can form rapidly, it depends on the conditions. Again with your insulting ignorant assumptions.
Why don’t you go study the subject property before declaring yourself the worlds leading expert on the subject. You are insulting every ones intelligence with your wild accusations and erroneous statements.
Jyar Wrigglesworth
Pix and am123
“Why the incessant need to win? Why the need to be right? I say you are both right and both wrong.
Your both right to state your beliefs once. And both wrong to insist that the other is incorrect to the point of ridicule and anger.”
You can state your beliefs once?…, more like till everyone else has died of boredom from hearing it over and over like a broken record.
I only state evidence unless otherwise stated, eg ‘I think’. Science is based on evidence. dark age thought and belief intolerant dictatorships have no say in science. They have not studied the subject and have nothing to add to the debate apart from stupidity and ignorance.
Pix said:
“Fossils can form rapidly, it depends on the conditions. Again with your insulting ignorant assumptions.”
I am not assuming anything about the following spider fossil at the 30:25 mark of the following video. It is claimed to have happened at a rate of 2 inches per one million years. That is what is claimed for this fossil in a national park in America with a sign stating just how slowly the sedimentary rock formed around it:
“Scientific Age of the Young Earth – Dr. Don Patton”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1GJjHXX0Ic
At the 30:25 mark of the above video, it is claimed by scientists that the body of that Wolf Spider remained intact—fully formed—without disintegrating into dust, for 500,000 years before it turned into a perfectly formed fossil. Does that make sense? Do you believe that Pix, that the spider’s body would remain intact for half a million years before being covered by rock?
At this point I would say go back to my original comment that states,” Consider the woman who carried her dead baby within her womb for 40 years. When it was finally removed after the 40 year carriage, it was completely calcified. Stone, if you will.
I am not agreeing nor am I disagreeing with your argument. I only bring this up to say that there are many mysteries. I dare not presume to have any definite answers, only many questions. And the more questions I ask, the more questions I have.”
am123- ” Do you believe that Pix, that the spider’s body would remain intact for half a million years before being covered by rock?”
I know that this question was not directed to me. But what if the spider was flash frozen and stayed hard frozen for all of those years until it became fossilized? Would that then satisfy your mind?
I ask, because I have a fascination. It is like a journey to a place I have never been before, when I share these thoughts and ideas. It is a joy to me, a wonder.
Not the battle ground that others seem to find.
Jyar Wrigglesworth,
You said:
“I know that this question was not directed to me. But what if the spider was flash frozen and stayed hard frozen for all of those years until it became fossilized? Would that then satisfy your mind?”
No, because you would have to make that same case for the millions(?) of fossils we have. Like a shrimp dies and gets washed up on the shore and gets flash frozen? I don’t think so. There is even a fossil of a big fish eating a little fish in the same fossil—can’t make the flash frozen case there either. Nor in the case of a female dinosaur giving birth. Etc.
am123- Then you are not allowing for a TRue global disaster of EPIC proportions.
For instance. Do you play pool? Billiards? Say a giant (and I mean tremendous) asteroid came through the solar system and hit earth head on. (Rumor has it that has happened.) And also, say that it hit earth out of orbit from the sun, caught a little English (spin) hit another planet, and then hit earth again on the rebound, knocking it back into a warmer orbit at a much later date many thousands of years later.
Now, is that not a possibility? (That is a yes or no question, BTW.)
Change that theory to a heavenly object of equal size or greater than the earth. Since I am using a pool table comparison, please.
Jyar Wrigglesworth,
To answer your yes or no question……….no.
Again, because the evidence doesn’t fit such a theory. A giant asteroid hitting the earth is not going to affect things in an instant and have things flash freeze all over the earth in an instant. For example, things in the tropics, if you took away the heat from the sun in an instant, would they freeze in an instant? No.
However, the flood of Noah would have the effect that we see in the fossil record.
” things in the tropics, if you took away the heat from the sun in an instant, would they freeze in an instant? No”
Sorry. You are wrong. You might want to sit down and discuss this with an astronomer in person.
Without the warmth or a very close proximity to the sun ( in such a violent theory event) everything would flash freeze if far enough away from the sun, especially with massive amounts of particulates in the atmosphere.
You are also assuming that whatever hit the earth was not made entirely of ice.
That is my whole point of this conversation. There are too many possibilities. Too many unknowns. Everyone is guilty of guessing at this point and my guesses are as good as anyone elses.
Truth is stranger than fiction. Fiction has to make sense.
YEAH, AN INTELLIGENT COMMENT!!
Too many of you here labor, needlessly, in your struggle against deception and folly.
Follow the pure doctrine of Lucifer, and end your suffering over the wealth that you so desire.
Power, glory and endless life, shall be yours.
So many are lost here. You labor, needlessly, in your struggle against deception and folly.
Follow the pure doctrine of Lucifer, and end your suffering over the wealth that you so desire.
Power, glory and endless life, shall be yours.
The great thing about this video is that ordinary people did repent or t least show a desire for repentance. God touched their hearts and their minds through this man. Not an American, no surprise there. Not an Australian either. It was a corrupted (from living in US or overseas various places) New Zealand accent or possibly even South African. He couldn’t haver been American, he didn’t ask for money, or make a video designed to make money.
“You cannot serve both God and mammon.”
Enough said. Thanks for the video.
Yes, only one of the assertions is correct by this lady, the rest is just to scare you and she should not say it for that purpose. All she had to do was not wash her hair if she wanted to scare you.
BUT, people forget one thing, you shall hear of wars and rumors of war (like Putin on the Ritz) which shall be quite common in the future (China) but ONE warning Jesus did give was and THIS gospel shall be preached unto all nations and then THE END WILL COME.
A SPECIFIC Gospel was to be preached.
Has this gospel been preached to Cuba or North Korea? NYET!
Powerful stuff… If you think you are a “good Christian” or even a “good Person”… you will probably be surprised…. You should watch this video through to the end.
Great post Lynn!
Hi Lyn,
I heard an interview of Ray on Trunews.com with Rick Wiles and I am looking forward to this movie. It doesn’t have Russell Crowe but who cares as long as it has the truth.
Be watchful and prayerful as we go into April. We are entering into a holy season and I expect great things to happen.
CC
Here is a news flash, you all will some day die. We all reach our own end time. If you choose to spend yours hiding under a rock in fear then you should just shut up and crawl under it.
Your end will come. How will you live? Know that and there is no fear. Fear is for the weak. Live. Be a man, have honor, protect and provide. God will handle the rest.
Sorry Lyn,
I just got caught up in the moment with some of my other comments.
God bless
CC
What a boring video, what total nonsense
good one
Well, the ‘good news’ is Christ came to save us from our sins. And that’s the gospel; which means ‘good news.’ Those who believe that and trust Him have eternal life and that abundantly. Gonna be good. I have no doubt we who are saved will all be straightened out on the side bar issues we have. There will be all of eternity to have these discussions. We’ll most likely be in ‘thank you’ mode for quite some time for being clothed in Christ’s righteousness as we have none of our own.
Good flick, Ray. Keep it up, man.
Absolutely phenomenal!The future development is worthy of expecting!
Dear Lyn,
Thank you.
Peace and Love
The bible Lyn?? come on… 21 century’s of romance… an ancient romance… more than 12.000 years old… re-written dozens of times… come on…
Mark
“The bible Lyn?? come on… 21 century’s of romance… an ancient romance… more than 12.000 years old… re-written dozens of times… come on…”
Actually Judaism began life as the Pharisees c140 BCE to 37 BCE, a group of rich banker money lenders and big business owners, and was at various times a political party, and a social movement group. After 70 CE became the basis for Judaism.
Judaism was not Jewish, it did not exist when Jesus was alive. It’s not much older if any than Christianity, their oldest complete “ancient romance” is 6th century CE, Greek. The Christian bible was compiled throughout the 6th to 10th centuries CE.
None it is anywhere near as ancient as they are claiming. The worlds first mono deity thought and belief intolerant dictatorship, mono godship as opposed to a joint sister/wife – brother/husband shared godship, was invented by the Egyptian Pharaoh, Amenhotep IV, c1’300 BCE. There are no older examples anywhere in the world.
*Jesus was not Jewish. not Judaism isn’t Jewish… sorry it’s late.
Mark
“The bible Lyn?? come on… 21 century’s of romance… an ancient romance… more than 12.000 years old… re-written dozens of times… come on…”
Actually Judaism began life as the Pharisees c140 BCE to 37 BCE, a group of rich banker money lenders and big business owners, and was at various times a political party, and a social movement group. After 70 CE became the basis for Judaism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharisees
“The Pharisees were at various times a political party, a social movement, and a school of thought in the Holy Land during the Second Temple period, beginning under the Hasmonean dynasty (140–37 BCE) in the wake of the Maccabean Revolt. After the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE, Pharisaic beliefs became the liturgical and ritualistic basis for Rabbinic Judaism (commonly known as simply Judaism).”
Jesus was not Jewish, Judaism did not exist when Jesus was alive. It’s not much older if any than Christianity, their oldest complete “ancient romance” is 6th century CE, Greek. The Christian bible was compiled throughout the 6th to 10th centuries CE.
None it is anywhere near as ancient as they are claiming. The worlds first mono deity thought and belief intolerant dictatorship, mono godship as opposed to a joint sister/wife – brother/husband shared godship, was invented by the Egyptian Pharaoh, Amenhotep IV, c1’300 BCE. There are no older examples anywhere in the world.
Very good and well made video. Makes me realize how few real knowledgeable Christians are in this country.
I would just say..do the math..population of Earth is? How many claim Christ as the only way? And some of those are wrong..the world is a dark place indeed.
“Are We REALLY Living In “THE END”?”
The end of what?
It can’t be the end of the world because there would be nothing for Jesus to rule for a thousand years on his return.
Reposted… don’t just thumb down if you can’t address the point raised, it makes you all look like idiot trolls.
“Are We REALLY Living In “THE END”?”
The end of what?
It can’t be the end of the world because there would be nothing for Jesus to rule for a thousand years on his return.
The end of the beginning of course
Where’d my comment go?
Thank you for sharing that, Lyn. We need to keep our heads looking up in expectation of the One who will return one day – hopefully soon. God bless you.
If no one has seen his other videos you guys definitely should.
the guy who does these videos is amazing.
Watch this one, its about God Vs Evolution and he shuts them down so bad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0u3-2CGOMQ
There is no contest at all. Evolution/change is observable fact, not a science theory. It’s how things evolve/change that is the theory part.
The only way you can deny observable fact is by being blind. Religions are political thought and belief intolerant dictatorships invented in the dark ages, nothing more.
Its easy to see that the Bible flood with Noah was stolen from older Mesopotamian stories. All they did was change names with the difference that the flood was a harsh punishment for humanity’s sinfulness.
Only gullible idiots believe in ancient fairy tales. Jesus never existed, and if he did, he was just another mad cult leader.
There is only one historical candidate that fits the description… the only begotten son of god the Roman emperor Julius Caesar, via Egyptian Pharaoh Cleopatra/Isis Meri. Born c 30 BCE, heir to the Roman empire and Egypt, titled, son of god, in the image of god, lamb of god, heir to the kingdom of god etc.
Fled into exile, the wilderness when his mother killed herself. Eventually captured and crucified on the orders of his rival, the older adopted son of Caesar Roman emperor Octavian/Augustus. Perfect timing. It also explains loads of strange inconsistencies in the biblical Christian version compiled throughout the 6th to 10th centuries CE.
Gosh, Pix, it’s hard to argue with people who make up their own facts.
(1) Julius Caesar was not a Roman emperor. Augustus was the first.
(2) Julius Caesar did not acknowledge that Cleopatra’s son was his.
(3) That son, Caesarion, was born in 47 B.C. and died in 30 B.C.
(4) Caesarion did not have any such titles.
Maybe you’re thinking of Augustus Caesar, who called himself “son of a god,”
as he was (by posthumous adoption) the son of the god Julius Caesar.
“Kingdom of God” and “lamb of God” are not Egyptian concepts. They are
Christian ones. The “lamb” is a sacrifice, to atone for sin. The “kingdom” is
the direct rule of God. And Jesus suggested that his followers could make it
a reality among themselves. “The kingdom of God is within you (plural form of ‘you’.)”
(5) Caesarion did have the title of king of Egypt. (He was co-regent with his mother, before.)
(6) Caesarion may have fled to India through Ethiopia, after his mother’s death.
The circumstances of his return to Egypt are not clear. The circumstances of his
murder in Alexandria are not known.
The only historical figure who fits the description of Jesus is Jesus himself. As described by people who knew him, and by people who knew his family and close associates.
Jesus was not Egyptian. Jesus was born about three and a half decades after the death of Caesarion. Jesus was born in Roman-occupied Palestine.
The historical reality of Jesus would be less “strange” to you, if you actually knew anything about it.
Pix, by the way, you used the Egyptian word “meri” as if it were a name, or specific to Isis.
The word means “beloved,” and it was applied to gods, goddesses, and objects even.
The Hebrew name of Jesus’ mother was a very common name in Palestine in the 1st century.
One-fifth of the women named, in Jewish and Christian literature of that era, were named Mary. There are six women named that, in the New Testament.
Jesus wasn’t Egyptian.
Gosh, Pix, it’s hard to argue with people who make up their own facts.
(1) Julius Caesar was not a Roman emperor. Augustus was the first.
Only technically. Caesar was given the power of an Emperor over an extended period of time by the senate, an award for his defence of Rome in battle. He was acting emperor, rather than a blood line emperor.
LifeIs
“Pix, by the way, you used the Egyptian word “meri” as if it were a name, or specific to Isis.”
Meri = Virgin. That’s ‘virgin’ as per their interpretation of an unmarried young women. It is well know that Cleopatra associated herself with Isis, because she was an unmarried young women giving birth to a son of a god. All rulers, Pharaohs, Kings, Queens, Emperors etc, were considered gods. God originally being an abstract term to describe anything and everything that can affect your life. Rulers affect our lives a great deal.
Lifels
“The Hebrew name of Jesus’ mother was a very common name in Palestine in the 1st century.”
No it wasn’t. Mary is a common name just about everywhere in Europe. Especially in Greece where the original material came from. Same as Jesus, it is a Greek name, not an Israelite name.
Many Christians always think it is the end of the world. I know first hand because I used to be a Christian. Even my grandmother said “she thought it was the end of the world when she went through the great depression”. She said and “you know what the world never ended because this whole world ending thing is a complete fraud:”. It just holds the populace in a constant state of fear which has been done for thousands of year.
Lyn your not helping this world by posting your fear driven articles in fact you only create more negativity in this world with this crap!
Maybe it is time to stop this fear porn and the end of the world scenarios and just live your life in the moment and not worry what the future holds. Those that think negatively bring negative things into they’re lives.
Running through the list of Lynn Leaz post titles, they are …….. the same. . Reminds me of Pavlov and his dogs. Still I enjoyed the video whichhad nothing to do with the headline rather more to do with dollars, BIN and psyopsm but we all know that by now
………the headline that is, not the video, which was great!
To the persons that voted me down,I wipe the dust from my feet as a testimony against you. It will be more tolerable for sodom and gomorah on the day of judgement than for this nation. .
I see Lyn busy with all her porn star accounts so she can thumb down/hide the comments she doesn’t like.
Something she readily accuses other people of doing, but it’s obvious it’s her.
Still never mind, the next stage after rejection is anger, if she’s not already angry at people dispelling her fairy stories, the stage after that is acceptance. The three stages of loss recovery.
It was just the land animals and birds of the air. There was no need to gather every insect or sea creature. And, as we know, God can cause the rocks to cry out if we do not praise him. So new species could have formed after the flood.
For all the learned quotes from the Bible, it appears that everyone forgets what we were admonished, that no one knows the time or the day the Son of Man will come again.
Read the whole verse. It is important to watch for the signs of our end and return of Christ. By understanding how little time we have left maybe we will repent from our evil actions. Besides that reason we have a command to watch.
Matthew 24:42 Watch therefore: for you know not what hour your Lord will come.
Matthew 24:43 But know this, that if the good man of the house had known in what watch the thief would come, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken up.
Matthew 25:13 Watch therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man comes.
Mark 13:33 Take you heed, watch and pray: for you know not when the time is.
Mark 13:35 Watch you therefore: for you know not when the master of the house comes at even, or at midnight, or at the cock crowing, or in the morning:
Revelation 3:3 Remember therefore how you have received and heard, and hold fast, and repent. If therefore you will not watch, I will come on you as a thief, and you will not know what hour I will come upon you.
sorry for being completely off-topic, but you’re really easy to look at, lyn
Stop with those religious beliefs and try to seperate truth from fiction instead… It clouds most minds and judgement
anotherfella: yeah, because a strictly naturalistic, atheistic belief has NEVER clouded anyone’s mind or judgement.
STALIN, MAO
Seriously misguided if you think “sons of God” were angels and the Book of Enoch has any real value when it comes to the bible. Study the KJV, you’ll find the answers there. http://goo.gl/nbrYIC
Twenty minutes? Thirty minutes? This is the INTERNET. You’re out of your mind.
Great movie …Thank you! You should all go see Trunews interview- Friday March 28, 2014 with Henry Gruver..
http://www.trunews.com/listen/
Faith knows in her heart. Doubt must see her G*D.
what end? Why is everything I read on here so dark. The earth has 3 ages. We are in the 2nd age. The 3rd is the 1000 year reign of Christ after his return. It will be a time of peace and learning. This for anyone who was led astray by false teaching. God is not willing any soul die who had not the opportunity to know HIS truth. At the end of the 1000 years there will be a judgment of those who still refuse Christ. The earth will be rejuvenated during this time. Christ will rule from Jerusalem. The wicked who chose to follow the released Satan for a final temptation will be erased or burnt from within by God . Only GOD can destroy what HE has created. Their smoke goes up for ever and ever, is a Hebrew way of saying finished, gone forever. GOD says ” I am a consuming fire.” The holy spirit warms the good but burns the evil as the simple way to phrase it. The earth will simply transform into that higher dimension and the kingdoms of the earth become the kingdoms of Christ. This is just what I have been taught and I don’t dread the transcendence and fear that change in the twinkling of an eye.
Pix wrote: ” the only begotten son of god the Roman emperor Julius Caesar, via Egyptian Pharaoh Cleopatra/Isis Meri. Born c 30 BCE,” and Julius Caesar was not an emperor, Rome did not have an emperor. And Caesarion was not born in 30 BC, he DIED in 30 BC.
And Pix said “meri” means “virgin” and it most certainly does not. It means “beloved,” and it applied to male and female gods, and to inanimate objects.
It was an Egyptian word.
Pix said that Caesarion was crucified, which is simply a lie.
Pix said that Jesus was a Greek name. No. Jesus wasn’t named Jesus, he was named the same Hebrew name that is pronounced Joshua or Yeshua, and Jesus is a LATIN form of it.
Truthseeker keeps pretending that the well-documented 1st century accounts of Jesus were based on a biography of a Greek philosopher written in the 3rd century.
Both of you are abysmally ignorant and deluded.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/212399359/Bible-Chronology-by-Prophecy-CbP