| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Is Norse and Greek Prophecy Better Than The Bible? (Video)
Sunday, April 5, 2015 17:43
% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.
| Online: | |
| Visits: | |
| Stories: |
| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
who? what? No… The God of Israel Is Real -Believe In His Son.- Read your Bible .. Faithbrother.calm
“Is Norse and Greek Prophecy Better Than The Bible?”
What you mean like the Greek collection of scrolls in the bible called Revelation? Which is about Greek mythology. Seeing as the bible didn’t exist until the 6th century CE, the OT is a mixture of plagiarised histories, frequently wrong histories and fables from various places, and the NT is 90% proven fraud, either absolute fakes like all works attributed to the Turkish trader Saul/Paul and Revelations is Greek about Greek mythology, I would says yes.
I feel like I’ve just watched a low budget remake of American History X
Good looking guy, reasonably intelligent, ill informed
Please back up your opinions with facts
Of course Norse mythology is better. It’s way more interesting than Christian mythology. It can be no coincidence that Jesus was crucified, and that Thor carries a hammer.
To answer your headline, Jeffery Pritchett, No it is copied from the Bible – an imitable event that many cultures were jealous of.
You mean your 6th century CE book of plagiarised pagan myths called the Bible? What comes first, the horse or the cart? Greek myths are BCE mostly originating from old Thracian pantheon of deities (c2’000 BCE), your book of fables was created in the 6th century CE. Your claims is on a par with the devil planted dinosaur bones to test your faith the Universe is only 6’000 years old.
What of the Qumran find, Pix, which has fragments of the text that align almost perfectly, with what we already have, and date to the 2nd century (BCE)? What of the Septuagint, with admitted faults but substantially identical, which dates to the 4th century (CE)? Or P52, a portion of John, which dates to the early 2nd century (CE). Or the more than 5,000 fragments that we have?
You’re referring to the Masoretic text, Pix, on which most modern translations are based, to claim the Bible didn’t exist prior to 600 CE. I believe we have enough extant Scripture to make a very robust claim that the document is credible. Beyond reproach in my opinion.
We can do Dino’s again if you want but last time, we tried, you ran off with your tail tucked before we had gotten very far. All i got from you was some mutterings about the T-rex in the Smithsonian. Do you remember? I was explaining how little we actually know, about the many wonderful and awesome creatures that have roamed this earth, and you wouldn’t reply.