| Story Views | |
| Now: | |
| Last Hour: | |
| Last 24 Hours: | |
| Total: | |
Peter Hofschroer: Extradition Plus Appeal Plus Grandma B Case: Timeline Plus Archive 25 Jan 2017
Peter Hofschroer was released from prison to a bail address before Christmas [just] and awaits an extradition appeal hearing =
“No news from lawyers yet re the appeal yet. We have applied for permission to appeal and await the outcome. If it is not granted, the police will probably turn up and take me away without warning… I am contacting AP every day (when I remember) just to let him know all is okay. If no news is received for a couple of days and I do not answer in my mobile, then it is likely they have come to take me away, tra, la. I am told that Mum is still alive and “happy” being a prisoner. Do these people really think I am silly enough to believe their lies? I collected my car on Sunday and could not believe how much stuff I had in it. Much of it is Mum’s clothes and possessions. Her kidnappers did not bother to take any of her clothes and possessions with her, not even her meds. One wonders why I was held for four hours and what the police, etc. were doing in our flat in Germany in the time they held me. It seems probable that the BND were involved (German secret police, the latest incarnation of the Gestapo) and the British military police present were possibly from their “intelligence” branch – I always find the term “military intelligence” amusing. What an oxymoron! So what were they doing in the four hours they were in our flat? It would have taken them minutes to search it. It seems probable they accessed and copied my digital data. If they did, then why did they not arrest and charge me with possession of indecent images in Germany? Any guesses here? Having got my car back, it is interesting to note what is “missing”. Every official document with Mum’s name on it has gone – her German medical insurance card, the disabled parking disc, her inoculation pass, her disabled persons pass. The police had a warrant to search the car for indecent images, but took all documentation on Mum. That could only be at Dear Brother’s request, so it shows that the Savile Police are working for him.
Then the documentation needed to access my bank account also disappeared. I suspect the contents of the accounts have likewise gone. So the police have a copy of all the digital evidence I have of police corruption, access to my money and all documents referring to Mum. Could that have been the real reason for detaining me? Don’t need three guesses here, do we?” [ends] =============================================================
see more: the main “Grandma B” [Barbara Hofschroer - Peter's mother] is here: https://grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/
http://chrisspivey.org/surrender-to-love-the-abuse-of-grandma-b/ =============================================================
PETER HOFSCHROER: FORCED EXTRADITION TO AUSTRIA – 20/11/16
above: Peter at the 3 Nov. hearing at Marylebone Mag. court – it was adjourned until the 10 Nov.
Peter’s extradition hearing went ahead on the 10th Nov. and he was ordered to be returned to Austria to face possible charges there, and was – horror of horrors – remanded to HMP Wandsworth, I found out only today. Anyone whose had the misfortune to have to taste prison tea in a 15 x 15 cell will know Wandsworth is the worst and strictest jail in London – it is serious. A real hellhole 10 times worse than the others which are in comparison holiday camps. Usually this HMP is reserved for the more serious clientele who go on holiday there.
If he had to be remanded at all he should’ve gone to HMP Brixton at worst – a remand prison wholly – very lenient – or even more properly an immigration centre like Colnbrook [where Musa was supposed to go but they messed that up] or Harmondsworth or somewhere where extraditionees + returnees are supposed to go – but Peter has charges pending in Austria though even baseless and unproven and a dodgy Austrian false psych report – his legal reps have let him down so badly again, and surely should’ve gone to somwhere like for Colnbrook I. C.[it is closed not open but much more lenient than a prison] and he pays for it even by having to wait probably months in strict Wandsworth if an appeal is on the cards. His legal team let him down badly there. And this Wandsworth time probably won’t be taken into consideration anywhere at anytime now his UK jail time is done.
PETER HOFSCHROER’S EXTRADITION HEARING IS ON NOV. 3 AT MARYLEBONE MAGISTRATES COURT – nearest underground tube station: Marylebone. [N.B. Marylebone court IS Westminster court - the same place = City of Westminster Magistrates' Court - Wikipedia
The City of Westminster Magistrates' Court was a magistrates' court located at 70 Horseferry ... replaced on 27 September 2011 with Westminster Magistrates' Court, built on the site of Marylebone Magistrates' Court at 181 Marylebone Road].
Update 22 Oct. Peter was granted bail on the 20 Oct. and has been released.
Update 16 Sept. They couldn’t manage to produce Peter for yesterday’s extradition hearing – everything adjourned until 3 November. However, Peter looked well during a short hastily arranged video link where he was told the new date. Excellent turnout.
Update 14 Sept. 16: Peter confirms that he will be there on the 15 Sept. 16 @ Westminster Magistrates Court @ 2.30pm, but its best to check for changes as near that time as possible.
Update 10 Sept. 16: Peter states that he hopefully will be present on the 15th’s hearing in London. But as always its best to call WESTMINSTER MAGISTRATES COURT as we know how they play games…expect the unexpected always!! STILL no news about or from his mother – Grandma B – this despicable situation of being denied contact with his own mother has gone on for so long – since mid-2015 or even before – all concocted by government departments / Yorks SS / and others… Again he states lawyers have let him down badly, especially the CoP, who are “messing him about”. One cannot make a leopard change its spots!!
Above: Peter being arrested by plain-clothes after turning up at the Yorks. court in early December 2014. He has been in custody ever since, until Oct. 20 2016. The extradition hearing to Austria went ahead on the 15 September 16 at WESTMINSTER MAGISTRATES COURT at 2pm. This September date did not bring the end to a near 2 year imprisonment which began December 2014.
It is important to note that objections to the Warrant were not put forward regarding Article 6, which states:
- “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interest of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice.
- Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.
- Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights:
- (a) to be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him;
(b) to have adequate time and the facilities for the preparation of his defence;
(c) to defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require;
(d) to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him;
(e) to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court.”
As worryingly is the fact that P states his home in Austria cannot be sold until P has passed, and as certain characters, it is alleged, will be wanting their pay-off regarding their parts in the conspiracy to imprison and persecute P, and all connected to that, P”s disappearance will follow once he is ensconced in the Austrian asylum, should the Extradition Warrant be executed. P’s death must be stopped from happening at all costs.
THE SCANDAL OF GRANDMA B – THE RADIO I’VIEW BACK ONLINE – MUST LISTEN!! 1 Dec. 2012
https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/the-scandal-of-grandma-b-the-radio-iview-back-online-must-listen/
PETER HOFSCHROER TRIAL: 8 JULY 16
“Peter Hofschroer trial: Historian claims he had evidence about Jimmy Savile” + archive
STOP THE FRAUD ON THE COURT!! see more:
https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/stop-fraud-on-the-court-in-the-uk
WHERE IS “PEOPLE’S HERO AND COMMON LAW LAWYER” PATRICK CULLINNE?
……………………………………………………………………………………………..
8 July: Peter Hofschroer trial: Historian claims he had evidence about Jimmy Savile
A HISTORIAN accused of downloading tens of thousands of sexual images of children has claimed he is a man of integrity. Peter Anthony Hofschroer, 60, who specialises in the Napoleonic Wars, denied that he had used a Prussian regiment name for an account on a website of indecent images, carried out internet searches for illegal images or downloaded a story about children having sex with each other. He claimed he was the victim of a conspiracy between a fellow military historian who won defamatory damages in a court case against him, the judge in that case and a Duke; and that he had evidence of senior people linked to North Yorkshire Police engaging in al fresco sex with Jimmy Savile on the North York Moors. He denied he had been discredited through civil injunctions brought against him by the military historian and North Yorkshire Police. “Sometimes I get things wrong, sometimes I tell a little white lie – I am a human being – but I am a man of integrity. My record is not unblemished, but it is cleaner than most,” he claimed at Teesside Crown Court.
“You are a paedophile,” alleged Peter Hampton for the prosecution. He replied: “No I am not”. Hofschroer, of no fixed address and formerly of Rosedale Avenue, Acomb, denies 16 charges of downloading sexual images of children. The charges relate to more than 36,000 pictures and videos found on computers in his former office in Acomb, on his laptop and in a computer tower found in a car he rented. The trial continues. In evidence, he denied causing a family rift when he moved to York in 2008. The jury have heard technical evidence that the images were downloaded from 1997 to 2014 and that when he was arrested, he accused the interviewing officers of being sex offenders. In cross-examination, Mr Hampton alleged that whenever anyone challenged Hofschroer he got very angry with them. “When anyone spends years persecuting me, I lose my temper,” he replied. The barrister said: “You make people’s lives hell.” “Oh, really, what have these people done to my mother and I – nine years of persecution,” he replied. “To distract from what you are really up to,” said Mr Hampton. Hofschroer laughed: “What I am really up to?” Mr Hampton said: “Looking at images of little boys.”
Earlier, he had denied that when he was arrested at York Magistrates Court, he tried to stop police taking a laptop he had with him, knowing it had more than 20,000 indecent images of children on it. “I would have been insane walking into that situation anticipating being arrested with incriminating evidence on my laptop”, he claimed, adding the laptop contained evidence of police corruption he didn’t want officers to see. He had been about to prosecute three of his relatives and claims the images were planted on the computer later. Day 3 report: Historian claims he was framed by brother and police A HISTORIAN has claimed his brother and North Yorkshire Police collaborated to frame him as having indecent images of children. Peter Anthony Hofschroer, 60, alleged he was the victim of serial harassment by police and social services and that they have refused to investigate his complaints against them. He was giving evidence at his trial on 16 charges of possessing indecent images of children. The prosecution allege he had more than 36,000 sexual pictures and videos of children ranging from the least to most serious on computers and laptops seized by police twice, two years apart. Hofschroer, of no fixed address and formerly of Rosedale Avenue, Acomb, denies all 16 charges. He claimed at Teesside Crown Court that he had been living in Austria with his mother in December 2012 when police seized computers from the Acomb house where he and his parent had been living until late 2009. The jury have heard that computer experts found nearly 7,000 illegal sexual images of children on them. “I am not sure the computers the police seized were actually mine,” he claimed.
He alleged his brother Robert falsely told police that the computer towers he had left at the house had been stolen in a 2011 burglary, and that family members had taken his possessions from the house without his permission. In July 2011, he had arranged for bailiffs to make an inventory of items in the house. “And suddenly there were the two computers there, that had been reported stolen. They had dramatically reappeared with indecent images on them. What a surprise,” he alleged. He alleged that through work in the computer games industry, he was aware of ways images could be put on to computer equipment. Robert Hofschroer had earlier alleged to the jury the towers had not been stolen in the burglary and denied putting images on them. Both he and North Yorkshire Police deny all Hofschroer’s allegations against them. The trial continues. Peter Hofschroer claimed he had logged 200 incidents of harassment by North Yorkshire Police and North Yorkshire social services, and that he and his mother had been unable to return to York for years after they went for a Christmas holiday in Austria because they were intimidated into not returning.
————————————————
NB: The information “Peter is “of no fixed abode” only because his home in Austria was sold behind his back and without his permission whilst he was on remand, since Dec. 1014, awaiting this trial, to which, it is alleged, his legal team let him down very badly in many areas” was got from P’s earlier communications, from P himself, but it appears this info was incorrect, and his home in Austria is yet to be sold, according to later communications from P. Nevertheless, his mother’s home was sold [Google “Grandma B” – Barbara Hofschroer – who has been denied contact with Peter since December 2015] – see Lord Maginnis making a plea in Parliament and the response he got from fellow Parliamentarians, including the Ministry of Justice, in 2012 – nothing!!
LORD MAGINNIS – PARLIAMENTARY SPEECH RE: THE SHOCKING HOFSCHROER CASES 15/05/2012 – WATCH VIDEO: https://vid.me/Ia27
THE RADIO INTERVIEWS: Please see this radio show to hear Peter tell the story in a nutshell – well, a lot of it = Radio interview with Peter on “Anonymous Radio” December 2012 – thanks to C. Jarvis, radio host: https://vid.me/e/9bVD?stats=1&tools=1
2 interviews with Sonia Poulton + the Hofschroers: dated: 15 Jan 2014 = https://www.vimeo.com/84524221 + 3 Feb. 2014: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PER__Kx-EP
———————————————–
Breaking News: Peter’s prison – Staff walk out:
http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teesside-news/holme-house-governor-prison-officers-11578962
140
————————————————————-
7 July 2016: Peter Hofschroer trial: Police and my brother framed me, he claims
Man goes on trial accused of having 36,000 indecent images of children
7 July 2016
A HISTORIAN has claimed his brother and North Yorkshire Police collaborated to frame him as having indecent images of children. Peter Anthony Hofschroer, 60, alleged he was the victim of serial harassment by police and social services and that they have refused to investigate his complaints against them. He was giving evidence at his trial on 16 charges of possessing indecent images of children. The prosecution allege he had more than 36,000 sexual pictures and videos of children ranging from the least to most serious on computers and laptops seized by police twice, two years apart. Hofschroer, of no fixed address and formerly of Rosedale Avenue, Acomb, denies all 16 charges. He claimed at Teesside Crown Court that he had been living in Austria with his mother in December 2012 when police seized computers from the Acomb house where he and his parent had been living until late 2009. The jury have heard that computer experts found nearly 7,000 illegal sexual images of children on them. “I am not sure the computers the police seized were actually mine,” he claimed.
He alleged his brother Robert falsely told police that the computer towers he had left at the house had been stolen in a 2011 burglary, and that family members had taken his possessions from the house without his permission. In July 2011, he had arranged for bailiffs to make an inventory of items in the house. “And suddenly there were the two computers there, that had been reported stolen. They had dramatically reappeared with indecent images on them. What a surprise,” he alleged. He alleged that through work in the computer games industry, he was aware of ways images could be put on to computer equipment. Robert Hofschroer had earlier alleged to the jury the towers had not been stolen in the burglary and denied putting images on them. Both he and North Yorkshire Police deny all Hofschroer’s allegations against them. The trial continues.
PETER HOFSCHROER TRIAL “He made life hell, says his brother…” 5 July 16
DAY 2 REPORT: 5 JULY 2016 1 day ago / Megi Rychlikova A RESPECTED military historian harassed his family, made criminal allegations against them, sued them in the courts and ruined them financially, a jury heard. Martin Hofschroer alleged he had to change his job after his uncle Peter Hofschroer contacted his employer, alleging he was a pervert, a fraudster and a criminal. Martin’s father Robert claimed relationships within the family were fine until his brother moved into York to look after their parents. “After that it was hell, to be plain, it was hell.” he alleged.
————————————————————————————
THE ABUSE OF GRANDMA B – TIMELINE OF THE MAIN EVENTS
JANUARY 2007 – Grandma B and her late husband Paul sign over their house to Robert and his family in return for the promise of care support.
APRIL 2008 – Paul is admitted to hospital seriously ill. Peter returns to the parental home from Austria and finds that both his parents are suffering from neglect. He takes over their care.
MAY 2008 – Robert commences his aggressive efforts to seize his parents’ life savings.
JUNE 2008 – Paul returns home from hospital. Robert and his family refuse to provide any care for Paul and Barbara, forcing Peter to give up his home and career to do so.
AUGUST 2008 – Peter reports the abuse to York SS and the crime to NYP. They refuse to act, then start their campaign of persecution of Barbara, Paul and Peter.
SEPTEMBER 2008 onwards – Robert starts stalking Barbara and Peter. NYP refuse to act. DECEMBER 2008 – On Christmas Day, Robert and his family breach the peace outside Barbara’s house, terrifying Paul , who is ill in bed. NYP refuse to act.
JANUARY 2009 – Paul dies. Robert and his family charge into his house, assault Barbara and Peter, then bawl abuse at them and Paul’s corpse. NYP threaten to arrest Peter.
MAY 2009 – A stage 2 investigation into York SS finds largely in Barbara’s favour, ordering the safeguarding investigation to be reopened. JULY 2009 – York SS hold a safeguarding meeting at which they refuse to consider the evidence of abuse and crime, and refuse to act.
OCTOBER 2009 – Barbara and Peter hand out a leaflet at a ward meeting protesting at the failure of NYP and York SS to act. NYP threatens to arrest them.
NOVEMBER 2009 – NYP issues the first Harassment Warning against Peter. (In 2014, this and all other allegations of harassment are withdrawn due to lack of evidence.)
DECEMBER 2009 – Barbara and Peter go to Austria for a holiday.
FEBRUARY 2010 – York SS and NYP establish Barbara and Peter are in Austria. They tip off Robert, who then breaks into Barbara’s house, change the locks and steal Barbara’s belongings. York SS and NYP refuse to act.
DECEMBER 2010 – Robert commences his first attempt to fraudulently sell Barbara’s house. Her solicitors prevent this.
JANUARY 2011 – Robert and NYP attempt to have Peter arrested in Austria for ‘kidnapping’ Barbara. The Austrian police investigate and find no evidence.
JUNE 2011 – Bailiffs acting on behalf of Barbara regain control of her house and she prepares to return home. NYP and York SS refuse to safeguard her.
MAY 2012 – Lord Maginnis raises this case in Parliament. He states he has substantial evidence to show that NYP, York SS and Robert are colluding to defraud Barbara of her house. The government refuses to act.
JUNE 2012 – NYP threaten to arrest Peter. The Austrian judiciary declares him to “lack mental capacity” to prevent him from litigating against Barbara’s abusers.
JULY 2012 – Robert breaks into Barbara’s house again, changes the locks and withholds the key. DECEMBER 2012 – Robert makes his next attempt to fraudulently sell Barbara’s house. Her solicitors prevent this.
JULY 2013 – Bradford County Court issues an injunction stopping Robert from making any further attempt to sell Barbara’s house.
AUGUST 2013 – The Austrian judiciary declare that Peter is suffering from incurable paranoia and appoint an attorney to run his affairs. Peter is later examined by a psychiatrist, who establishes that he is perfectly sane.
SEPTEMBER 2013 – The Austrian judiciary order that Peter be detained under section. Barbara and Peter leave Austria for Germany where the authorities grant them “persecuted persons” status.
MAY 2014 – German police raid Barbara’s refuge without lawful reason and hand her over to Robert. Peter is detained for four hours, then released without charge. Robert takes Barbara to York, where he recommences his abuse of her.
DECEMBER 2014 – Peter returns to the UK to undertake legal action to safeguard Barbara. He is ambushed by her abusers and imprisoned without lawful reason.
AUGUST 2015 – Robert deposits Barbara in a “care” home against her will and fraudulently sells her house. Barbara suffers several life-threatening injuries as a result of negligence.
OCTOBER 2015 – York SS starts proceedings in the Court of Protection to prevent her friends and Peter from having any contact with Barbara. Barbara is so severely injured due to wilful negligence that she requires major surgery and is crippled.
PETER HOFSCHROER Jan. 16 2016 update:
The Abuse of Grandma B – How Corrupt Officials are plundering the Assets of the Elderly and http://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/1-new-items/german-police-kidnap-grandma-b/
Peter and his mother had originally fled the UK because of Grandma B’s persecution, which even Lord Maginnis had brought up in parliament [see below for 15/05/2012 video of Maginnis in parliament talking about the Grandma B case, trying to get something done]. Peter came back to the UK in 2014 to bring charges against his brother, the [alleged] root of these troubles. Alas, when Peter went to the York hearing in December 2014, he was arrested and has been inside on remand ever since to, we suppose and allege, shut him up. What is behind his remand is the Grandma B case, which has been ongoing for years… Please see this radio show to hear Peter tell the story in a nutshell – well, a lot of it =
Radio interview with Peter on “Anonymous Radio” December 2012:
https://vid.me/e/9bVD?stats=1&tools=1
2 interviews with Sonia Poulton + the Hofschroers:
+ 3 Feb. 2014: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PER__Kx-EPs
LORD MAGINNIS – PARLIAMENTARY SPEECH RE: THE SHOCKING HOFSCHROER CASES 15/05/2012 WATCH VIDEO: https://vid.me/Ia27
Letter to Cameron, the Serious Fraud Office [see below], + more did nothing
—————————————————————————-
“Peter has already had to spend one Christmas locked away for something he says he didn’t do – and it looks like he’ll spend another Christmas the same as the first – in HMP Hull. Peter, 59, has been held since 4 December 2014, with a supposed “trial” next July 16 at TEESIDE court, and his mother Grandma B, in her eighties, is now far from being well, we are told. Peter is the official carer [alleged] for his mother Barbara, otherwise known as “Grandma B”, but being in prison he can do little about what he alleges is the plundering of both his mothers property and assets, and his own property, The official site with much information is: http://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com “
Lord Maginnis has raised Grandma B’s case in Parliament several times now, openly accusing North Yorkshire Police and York Social Services of colluding to defraud her of her house and of persecuting both her and her loyal son and carer Peter Hofschroer.
LORD MAGINNIS – PARLIAMENTARY SPEECH RE: THE SHOCKING HOFSCHROER CASES 15/05/2012 WATCH VIDEO:
[From the 15/09/15 update [below], re: Lord Maginnis: From the House of Lords session with Lord Maginnis = In 2011 and 2012, Lord Maginnis of Drumglass kindly tabled a series of Questions in Parliament on this case, as the corrupt politicians and officials involved in the Abuse of Grandma B, now into its fifth year, have failed to see that it is stopped. However, the government will not accept responsibility for dealing with official corruption. Lord Maginnis’s question can be seen on video, a few minutes after the beginning, at 14mins 45secs into this video from the House of Lords Main Chamber session: http://www.parliamentlive.tv/main/Player.aspx?meetingId=10756&wfs=true
Among the more revealing questions – to which the government evaded giving any proper answers – were: “The Hofschroer case has been on my desk for several years now. A widow in her 80s was dispossessed of her home in a way that implies collusion between certain family members and the Social Services. A son who has come to the rescue has been harried by the North Yorkshire police (that particularly dubious constabulary merits careful investigation) to the extent that he and his aged mother have been pursued through an Interpol warrant to their “refuge” in Austria. [source: http://www.epolitix.com/latestnews/article-detail/newsarticle/proper-delegation-please-not-abdication/
“One may be advised to speak to the Independent Police Complaints Commission. I have, only to be told that the fairly obvious injustice that concerns me was not within its bailiwick because my complaint overlapped with social services. I belatedly referred the issue to the Justice Department, but it could not intervene. I am referring to a case where a lady in her 80s was cheated out of her home. The Minister knows it well and over the past three years the Home Office has received hundreds-yes, hundreds-of communications through me about the matter. Successive Secretaries of State have been so concerned that none would meet me, despite the fact that Interpol was activated to pursue this elderly lady all the way to her son’s home in Austria. Does anyone in authority care that social services and police in North Yorkshire have conspired in the persecution of Mrs Hofschroer and her son? Are details of dismissals, forced retirements and other shady and costly measures pertaining to North Yorkshire Police available to legislators in Parliament?
UPDATE: Email received 15/09/15:
“HOW SAVILE POLICE FORCE COLLABORATED WITH PSYCHOPATH IN MAJOR CROSS-BORDER FRAUD We have recently been given sight of a thread of emails, dated 22 April 2014, in which Grandma B’s [alleged] abusers, along with a senior CID officer in North Yorks Police [NYP], detail on the progress of the frauds they have committed against Grandma B and her carer – her loyal son Peter Hofschroer. As you may recall, Robert Hofschroer is employed by York Council to run “York + District Deaf Society”. Last December there were calls in the press for an investigation into what had happened to the proceeds of the sale of the Society’s Grade 2 listed premises in York – see “Call for probe into sale of deaf society site” – http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/11641192.Call_for_probe_into_sale_of_deaf_society_site/
We have heard no more about this and the probe requested does not appear to have taken place. This leaves open the question if this sale was another property fraud involving Robert Hofschroer and his associates in NYP and York Social Services [YSS]. They already stand accused in Parliament by Lord Magginis [see video https://vid.me/Ia27 ] of defrauding Grandma B of her house in a joint enterprise – see above Parliamentary link + “Questions in Parliament” here: https://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/2-the-abuse-of-grandma-b/questions-in-parliament/ T
hen we have had confirmation from a suitably qualified observer that Robert does indeed suffer from incurable paranoia and is also so insanely jealous of his younger brother’s achievements that he would be likely to commit criminal offences to harm Peter, and any other people he decides to target. He is also likely to pose a serious threat to the lives of his victims. No wonder he gets on so well with NYP and YSDS, where he has found a number of similarly disturbed accomplices. As we already know, after Robert and his family seized Grandma B’s house and other assets, they placed her in a home, where she is being held against her will, while being subjected to further abuse and neglect. The persecution to which Robert and his associates have subjected Grandma B have left her severely traumatised. Their objective would appear to be to weaken her will to live.
We fear for her life, particularly as she is now being held incommunicado. The emails we have seen are very revealing. NYP CID officer Ian Murray addresses both Robert and Martin in familiar terms, indicating their relationship is more than merely professional. Robert refers to a letter Martin has received from the lawyer representing them in a civil matter in Austria and asks Murray what he suggests they should ask his lawyer. The civil matter referred to here is regarding title to Peter’s house in Austria to which Martin and his sister Diane are alleged to have obtained title by deception. One may wonder what this private, civil matter in Austria has to do with the British police. What interest do they have in this fraud? Martin’s lawyer mentions that the Austrian courts have appointed an attorney to handle Peter’s affairs, as he has been declared as “lacking capacity”. The role of the Austrian authorities in this affair has been documented – see below, footnote 3]: ” 1
0) CRIMES COMMITTED BY THE AUSTRIAN AUTHORITIES” https://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/6-crimes-committed-by-the-austrian-authorities/
We have also had sight of a recent psychiatrist’s report on Peter’s mental health, which states that he is perfectly sane and doesnt lack capacity. So why have the Austrian authorities determined otherwise, so facilitating a major fraud? Robert also mentions that his “case” in Bradford will be “finalised” in August. The case in question here would appear to be that being undertaken by Grandma B to recover title to her house in York and to claim aggravated damages from her abusers – see below, footnote
4]: “YORK SOCIAL WORKER FACING CONTEMPT COMMITTAL” https://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/10-crimes-committed-by-robert-hofschroer/york-social-worker-facing-contempt-committal/
“INJUNCTIONS SERVED” https://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/10-crimes-committed-by-robert-hofschroer/injunctions-served/ Note the date of this thread of emails – 22 April 2014. Just days later on the 6th May 2014 Robert personally directed the raid by German police on Grandma B’s refuge there in which she was kidnapped and brought back to Robert’s house in York, where she was held prisoner until recently. So Robert had a “case” in Bradford he was expecting to be “finalised” in August. Once he had Grandma B under his control he would be in a position to “finalise” the “case” by preventing her from continuing to litigate against him. Clearly the reason given for the German police raid – that Peter had kidnapped his mother – was false. The German police certainly knew this at the time, so why did they facilitate this fraud? see: “GERMAN POLICE KIDNAP GRANDMA B – 2nd UPDATE” https://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/7-crimes-committed-by-the-german-authorities/german-police-kidnap-grandma-b/ and: “WHO PAID FOR THE ABDUCTION OF GRANDMA B?” https://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/york-council-corruption/who-paid-for-the-abduction-of-grandma-b/
So why did Robert need to brief a senior British CID officer on a civil matter in a foreign court? Does anybody need 3 guesses? What is very disturbing about this case is that there is a person known to be dangerously insane who is involved in a series of substantial frauds undertaken against vulnerable people with the support of the authorities in three countries. How can this be possible and what is going on here? Does this have anything to do with Robert’s association with Savile’s friend Jane Kenyon, with the “Scream Killer” and the stories of “al fresco” ritual sexual activities on Yorkshire Moors? see below, footnote 8]: “Robert Hofschröer & the “Scream Killer”- 1st Update” https://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/10-crimes-committed-by-robert-hofschroer/upcoming-story/
A parting thought – NYP state they have spent at least a 6-figure sum on this case in which they have tried to cover up their participation in major frauds undertaken against vulnerable people. This contrasts with their persistant refusal to investigate any complaints made against the Savile – Jaconelli – Corrigan child abuse ring that was active in the force area for decades. NYP will not reveal the names of the senior officer who were members of Savile’s “Friday Morning Club”. A whistleblower gets stitched up, while serious criminals are allowed to walk free. Why is this? “
[15/09/2015 update ends]
—————————————————————————————
—[message ends]
Reply from the Prime Minister’s office, dated 10 September, stating the above details in the letter sent to the P.M. have been passed to the Ministry of Justice. As of 2 October the MoJ still have not written regarding the horrific cases relating to “Grandma B” and Peter Hofschroer:
Likewise the Serious Fraud Office was written to, regarding the alleged theft of both “Grandma B”‘s house, as well as Peter Hofschroer’s house in Austria, but they will not act either, despite these being serious frauds:
More:
Radio interview on “Anonymous Radio” December 2012:
https://vid.me/e/9bVD?stats=1&tools=1
2 interviews with Sonia Poulton + the Hofschroers:
+ 3 Feb. 2014: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PER__Kx-EPs
CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST GRANDMA B
As the deeply disturbing case of Grandma B, as Barbara Hofschroer has come to be known is now in its 8th year we thought it a good idea to remind everybody what this 86-year-old great grandmother has been forced to endure from estranged family members and their associates in North Yorkshire Police [NYP], the City of York Council [CYC] and others. In 2007 Grandma B signed over her house to certain family members in return for the promise of care services, which they did not provide, and with the agreement she would live in it for the remainder of her life. However, these family members unlawfully evicted her in 2010 and have made several attempts to sell her house. Legal opinion here is that they have committed fraud under Sections 2 and 4 of the Fraud Act 2006. Neither NYP nor CYC have upheald the law here and prosecuted Grandma B’s abusers.
Since April 2008, these abusive family members have made incessant attempts to seize her life savings as well, a further criminal act that NYP have refused to investigate. Instead officers of NYP have made several attempts to oloocate her life savings presumably with the intention of handing them over to her abuser for a share of the proceeds. The most recent attempt was in July 2013 when NYP applied to York Crown court in order to facilitate this act of extortion. Grandma B has persistently refused to hand over her money to her abusers. Instead, she gave her younger son Peter powers of attorney to run her financial and property affairs.
Since then her abusers have made over 20 sets of false allegations against Peter culminating in his detention and imprisonment in December 2014 after incriminating material was planted in her house in York as well as in Peter’s house in Austria. On the morning of the 3rd January 2009, a couple of hours after her husband of 60 years had died Grandma B’s abusers barged into her house with a police escort, assaulted her and then hurled abuse at both her and her husbands corpse.
When Peter tried to protect her, the police assaulted him and threatened to arrest him? ? see interviews with Sonia Poulton dated 15 Jan 2014 = https://www.vimeo.com/84524221 and 3 Feb. 2014: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PER__Kx-EPs The IPCC has determined there was nothing wrong with the police action here. Throughout the summer of 2009 the abusive family members stalked Grandma B and her carer. On one occasion, when Peter was out her abusers attempted to break in. Grandma B was so frightened that her carer has never been able to leaave her alone since.
NYP has refused to record and investigate any of these offences. In December 2009, when Grandma B and her carer went to Austria for Christmas, a prearranged plan was implemented. Her abusers noticed she was not at home. York Social Services contacted her day club to establish she was away. Inspector Colin Moreton of North Yorkshire police had his officers make enquiries with neighbours to confirm this. On 22nd february 2010 Grandma Bs aledged abusers forced entry to her house changed the locks and unlawfully evicted her. Neighbours called the police,who stood by and watched while Grandma Bs aledged abusers removed her belongings.
The IPCC has determined there was nothing wrong with the police action here. In november 2010 Grandma B’s alleged abusers then made their first attempt to fraudently sell her house. Just after that the local goverment ombudsman called on NYP and CYC to urgently reopen the safeguarding investigation in to this care as he considered the original investigation to have been irregular as NYP and CYC council withheld all evidence of abuse. Five years have passed after this call. Grandma B has still not been safeguarded. In July 2011 bailiffs acting on behalf of Grandma B regained control of her house.
She made ready for her to return home, but as NYP and CYC confirmed to refuse to safeguard her, she would not. A year later Grandma B’s aledged abusers broke in to her house again changed the locks again and started this second attempt to fradently sell her house. NYP has failed to record and investigate this crime as well. Grandma B’s alleged abusers contrived to force her and her carer to leave their refuge in Austria.
They then went to Germany where the authorities gave them persecuted persons status. Despite that the German police broke in to their refuge on 6 May 2014 and handed her over to the abusers, who brought her back to York,where they are alleged to have continued to abuse her. NYP has refused to record and investigate these crimes. Grandma Bs abusers then had the DWP [Department For Work And Pensions] divert her pension in to a bank account under their control.
They then put her house on the market. NYP have refused to record and investigate these crimes. All Grandma B wants are to spend her remaining days living in her own home in peace and safety in the care of her loyal son Peter. Instead of that,she has been kidnapped, then handed over to her aledged abusers,who are plundering her assets unhindered, while her loyal son is held allegedly in jail unlawfully so he cannot do anything about this. In the past seven years, Grandma B has been the victim of serious criminal offences including fraud, extortion, kidnapping, theft, and harrassment. T
he perportrators of these crimes aledegedly include family members, North Yorkshire police and the City of York council, York social services, goverment officials, judiciary, and politicians. When are these people going to stop abusing Grandma B ? Grandma B recently smuggled a letter [below] past her captors to her loyal son Peter. We have reproduced it here. Sadly, she is too old to write it so she got a visitor to write it for her. The words are clearly hers and the signature genuine.
This letter shows all the accusations against her loyal son Peter are fake. Peter did write back with information on how Grandma B can visit him but she has been prevented from doing so which is emotional abuse. This is how the police and social services treat the elderly. Sonia Poulton describes this behaviour as obscene. For more information on this case Google the abuse of Grandma B or visit: http://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com
LETTER: a copy of a letter from Grandma B to Peter H.
—————————————————————————–
The “Indecent images case” – “York Press” 4 Dec. 2014
above: York Magistrates’ Court •First published 11:04 Thursday 4 December 2014 in News Last updated 11:05 Thursday 4 December 2014 A 58-YEAR-OLD man has appeared before York magistrates facing 18 charges relating to around 7,000 indecent images of children. Peter Hofschroer, formerly of Rosedale Avenue, Acomb, is expected to deny all the allegations he faces. Between them the charges allege he made indecent images of children on different dates over a ten-year period between 1999 and 2009. Magistrates decided the case was too serious for them to deal with and sent him to York Crown Court where he will appear on December 15. Hofschroer, who represented himself, was remanded him in custody. “ source: http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/news/11645266.Indecent_images_case/
Videos of the Arrest of Peter Hofschroer:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KW6Fn_nrIO0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjQamzv1tJQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWspaHSXDOk
UK WAR ON PENSIONERS: ‘The Abuse of Grandma B’
How corrupt Officials are plundering the Assets of the elderly ‘Grandma B’ is now 83 years oldRotten Borough She is wheelchair-bound and very frail. The past four years of her life have been horrendous. She lost her husband of 60 years, but that was the easy part. She has also been the victim of sustained and systematic abuse in which she has been defrauded of her house, subjected to threats and harassment because she will not hand over her life savings to her abusers, then unlawfully evicted from her house and stranded abroad, with her abusers trying, fortunately unsuccessfully, to sell her house fraudulently.
You may well ask who would do such an awful thing to a little, old lady in a wheelchair. Sadly, most abuse takes place within the family and this is very much the case here. The main abusers are Grandma B’s older son, his wife and her two adult grandchildren. Grandma B’s younger son was working abroad when he noticed something was very wrong. He immediately rushed back home, where his worst fears were confirmed.While he was travelling, his 87 year-old father was admitted to hospital with a serious heart complaint caused by neglect. His mother too was seriously ill due to neglect. His older brother and his family lived just around the corner, but had done little to help Grandma B and her very sick husband. A year before this, Grandma B and her husband had signed over their house to the older son and his family on the understanding they would care for them. Their younger son agreed to this, because he was living and working abroad and could not provide the level of care needed. Hardly was the ink on the agreement dry when the older son and his family started running Grandma B and her husband down, hoping they would pass on as soon as possible.
When, in April 2008, the younger son arrived in the parental home, he was horrified by what he saw. He dropped what he was doing, gave up his job and home and became the full-time carer for his parents. His father led a full and happy life in his last months. His mother’s physical health has improved dramatically since the younger son took over her care.As soon as the younger son took over the care of his parents, the older son and his family started a campaign of harassment designed to drive him out of the parental home and to seize control of their finances. Matters reached such a level in September 2008, that the younger son reported the criminal offences to the police and the abuse to social services.What followed from there can only be described as a nightmare.
The police made several attempts to arrest the carer on the basis of false allegations, while social services fabricated allegations against him in an attempt to have his powers of attorney revoked and the care of his parents placed in the hands of their abusers.A few days after the younger son made his complaint, the police arrived at the parental home to investigate a complaint he has “stolen” his parents’ money. They had no evidence to support this allegation made by the abusers, but refused to record a complaint of harassment by the abusers.Social services blocked all attempts at getting the abuse investigated. Grandma B’s social worker made a false allegation of assault against her carer, an unfit, middle-aged man. Social services withdrew this allegation when they were shown evidence that the social worker was a black-belt in martial arts. His claim to have been overpowered and physically ejected from the parental home without injury looked a little ridiculous, to say the least.
##########################################
Peter Hofschroer and Grandma B left the country, as they feared for themselves here, but, after a while…:
8 May 2014 = GERMAN POLICE KIDNAP GRANDMA B* In the early hours of Tuesday 6th May 2014, a dozen or more officers of the German police broke down the doors into Grandma B’s place of refuge. She was in bed, ill, having just come out of hospital. He carer was sitting on the bed when the police officers burst into the room. They struck her carer so hard on the head that he was knocked to the floor. They then jumped on his back, pinned him to the ground and handcuffed him.
Defenceless, they then squirted pepper-spray into his eyes at point-blank range, before carrying him out into the street in his underpants to the outrage of his neighbours. One neighbour attempting to film the incident was attacked by the police. Grandma B’s carer was then thrown into a police van and thence into a police cell, where he remained handcuffed for four hours. The police were fully aware that her carer suffers from chronic rheumatoid arthritis and refused to take off the handcuffs.
One officer dangled the key in front of him and laughed. In the meantime, Grandma B was carried out of her bedroom in her nightdress and taken away. She has not been seen nor heard of since. She is now a “disappeared” person. The German police also stole her passport and holiday money. Concerned neighbours mentioned the presence of two British ladies and some British men they thought might be police. Her carer has written to Joachim Gauck, the President of Germany, as follows and awaits an answer:
——– Original Message ——–
Subject: Barbara Hofschröer, aged 85, victim of abuse and crime
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 21:16:23 +0200
From: Peter Hofschröer
Dear Mr Gauck,
Y ou have spent your life fighting injustice and state-organised crime. I am hoping there is one serious injustice and state-organised crime you can help me fight. Two days ago, my 85 year-old mother Barbara Hofschröer, a British citizen, was kidnapped by the German police. She is now a “disappeared” person and I fear for her life. The same German police officers who forced entry into our flat in Germany, where we took refuge six months ago, attacked me, tortured me for four hours and then released me without charging me with having committed a criminal offence. I was imprisoned without lawful reason. In those four hours, they abducted my wheelchair-bound mother. They are refusing to tell me what they have done with her.
In 1948, my mother met and married my father Paul Hofschröer, a German prisoner of war, who later worked in the German Embassy in London. When they retired in 1986, they moved from London to York, where they bought a house. About the same time, I started working in Germany and later in Austria. When, in 2008, my parents became so feeble, they needed care, I moved into their house in York to look after them. However, they had been targeted by the police and social services, who were determined to defraud them of their assets. When I got in the way, many attempts were made to arrest me. I fought back. Lord Maginnis raised our case in the British Parliament several times, openly accusing the British authorities of corruption.
The government refused to act and my mother and I – by now my father had died as a result of this stress – fled to my house in Austria, where we sought refuge. The British police pursued us through Interpol and the Austrian authorities supported them, forcing us to flee to Germany, where we expected to be given protection and support. Instead of that, yesterday morning ten or more German police officers broke down the door of our flat, attacked me, punched me so hard I fell to the floor, then jumped on me, before handcuffing me. Pepper was sprayed into my eyes at point blank range. I was then tortured for four hours in a police cell, while my mother was kidnapped. Like my mother, I am a registered invalid and am defenceless against such brutality.
Nobody will tell me where my mother is. She is chronically ill and needs medication to keep her alive. She is not getting that medication.” see more: grandmabarbara.wordpress.com. There you will see more about the story and part of the evidence. And this is what Lord Maginnis said in the British Parliament on our case: “The Hofschroer case has been on my desk for several years now. A widow in her 80s was dispossessed of her home in a way that implies collusion between certain family members and the Social Services. A son who has come to the rescue has been harried by the North Yorkshire police (that particularly dubious constabulary merits careful investigation) to the extent that he and his aged mother have been pursued through an Interpol warrant to their “refuge” in Austria.
.
From the main site: https://grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/ The Abuse of Grandma B – How Corrupt Officials are plundering the Assets of the Elderly and https://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/1-new-items/german-police-kidnap-grandma-b/
