Visitors Now: | |
Total Visits: | |
Total Stories: |
By William L. Wilson
It’s time for us to face some cold, hard facts and stop pretending otherwise.
After 9/11/2001, we quickly concluded that we would not tolerate that kind of attack on innocent lives again. We developed the Department of Homeland Security, federalized security screenings at airports, and even launched a war against a terrorist group based in Afghanistan. We can debate whether these actions were effective, but we took them. After Richard “Shoe Bomber” Reid tried to blow up a plane by stuffing explosives in his shoes, we changed how TSA does things at airports. Again, we can debate whether we should have to take our shoes off, but we did something because we weren’t going to tolerate the possible destruction of another airliner.
But when it comes to guns, we as a nation don’t give a damn about mass shootings. In 2012 alone, there have been seven mass shootings (defined as at least four people killed in a public place). Two of them occurred in the same week of this month. Despite the prevalence of mass shootings over the last 20 or 30 years, we don’t change anything.
So let’s at least admit one thing to ourselves as a nation: we value the right to own firearms with very few restrictions so much that we are willing to tolerate mass killings on a regular basis.
To us, the risk of a terrorist flying an airplane into a building or blowing the plane up is more of a concern than:
Some of those incidents haven’t happened yet. Neither has a terrorist blowing up a plane as Richard Reid tried to do. We’ve taken steps to prevent an act like his, but we won’t take steps to prevent the others—even though we know they will happen.
We should not be proud that our national mindset is willing to accept mass shootings.
2012-12-15 18:13:35
Source: http://thethirdapple.wordpress.com/2012/12/15/what-is-acceptable-and-what-is-not/