Evidence for the eta meson of M89 hadron physics
Lubos has had two postings about evidence for bumps at LHC. See the recent post about Moriond meeting and and earlier post about ATLAS gluino workshop.
The post about Moriond meeting mentions a rumor spread by Jester telling about 5 sigma evidence for 750 GeV resonance from ATLAS. ATLAS refuses to comment. Remember that 750 GeV bump would correspond to one of the mesons of M89 hadron physics, whose masses are obtained by scaling those of ordinary hadron physics by factor 512 (see the earlier posting). There are many of them in the range 600-900 GeV with precisely predicted masses and Lubos indeed mentions that this is the region still allowing possibility for stop. I can only regret if the decays of M89 mesons could be resposible for wrong hopes about standard SUSY;-). I can estimate their masses and do some other simple things and even I confess that TGD predicted them but I am not responsible for their existence!;-)
In Moriond meeting the existence of 750 GeV resonance – now christened as Chernette – was questioned. One might expect that it decays also via Zγ channel. It doesn't. Could meson property explain this? Ordinary neutral mesons decay to gamma pairs and these decays are exeptional resulting axial anomaly term (instanton term for electric field coupled to pseudoscalar meson). This should be the case also for their scaled up M89 variants. The decay rate should be exceptionally high since the instanton term is proportional to mass scale squared and decay rate to mass scale to fourth. This could make these decays of Chernette much faster than other decays and at the same time serve as a demonstration that new hadron physics predicted by TGD (not me) is to be blamed for the anomaly.
Lubos mentions also indications for 285 GeV bump decaying to gamma pair. The mass of the eta meson or ordinary hadron physics is .547 GeV and the scaling of eta mass by factor 512 gives 280.5 GeV : the error is less than 2 per cent. I have already earlier demonstrated (see the earlier posting) that the mesons of ordinary hadron physics have bumps at the scaled up masses. After having worked with the idea about two decades, I dare to make bet that M89 is there.
There is evidence also for other pieces of new physics predicted by TGD. First evidence for MG,79 hadron physics which should be also there with mass scale 214 times that of ordinary hadron physics and for the Higgs of the second generation weak bosons at the same mass scale and having mass 4 TeV. There is evidence also for the Z boson of the second generation weak physics inducing the breaking of lepton universality (see this). I know that my colleagues are not so stupid as they pretend to be, and the breakthrough of TGD is unavoidable and doomed to occur within few years.
Source: http://matpitka.blogspot.com/2016/03/evidence-for-eta-meson-of-m-89-hadron.html
