Pure American bunk. A crappy telescope attached to an overactive imagination once convinced a lot of people that there were networks of irrigation canals on Mars. No excuse for this insanity today.
All is see is the moon craters, valleys, and a normal surface for a pock marked natural satellite. No structures, no spaceships, no underground entrances. I could make this look like a soccer ball if I mess with the contrast, hue, saturation and other photo techniques as you have showed here. Some people have their own telescopes that can show video and photos and space junk left on the moon with considerable more clear magnification than this. The reason they don’t show it on the internet and try to convince us it’s structures is because they know it isn’t. This is not the video and photo’s we seek, move along.
I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again: Messing with contrast is a HORRIBLE way to “analyze” a photo. It introduces digital artifacts that weren’t in the original.
Old Warrior
Nothing here, indeed a crap telescope with heat interference, I didn’t see anything resembling a BIG structure or much else of interest either… what a load.. stop smoking the stuff it will make you blind..
Now, what was I supposed to be looking at? Structures or something like that? Can someone tell me where they are or supposed to be. I can see the moon better on a clear night without any telescope.
Debunking the bunk on this story.
MMMMM? Where’s the Proof? I can see the moon better with my telescope… I can even see down inside of craters…. Debunked.
Pure American bunk. A crappy telescope attached to an overactive imagination once convinced a lot of people that there were networks of irrigation canals on Mars. No excuse for this insanity today.
All is see is the moon craters, valleys, and a normal surface for a pock marked natural satellite. No structures, no spaceships, no underground entrances. I could make this look like a soccer ball if I mess with the contrast, hue, saturation and other photo techniques as you have showed here. Some people have their own telescopes that can show video and photos and space junk left on the moon with considerable more clear magnification than this. The reason they don’t show it on the internet and try to convince us it’s structures is because they know it isn’t. This is not the video and photo’s we seek, move along.
I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again: Messing with contrast is a HORRIBLE way to “analyze” a photo. It introduces digital artifacts that weren’t in the original.
Nothing here, indeed a crap telescope with heat interference, I didn’t see anything resembling a BIG structure or much else of interest either… what a load.. stop smoking the stuff it will make you blind..
Now, what was I supposed to be looking at? Structures or something like that? Can someone tell me where they are or supposed to be. I can see the moon better on a clear night without any telescope.
Debunking the bunk on this story.
so full of crap. resolution sucks, besides, there isn’t anything up there. don’t take your science FICTION so seriously, Fool
All i see is blurry stuff